Harry and Meghan #84 Haz should've listened to Auntie Anne, kept his balls to stay a man.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Hey I have a soft spot for some of those admitted always awful movies. Some of them are hilarious to watch. They always have a tiny European principality with a ridiculous name like Calpurnia, Aplenstein, Senova or I kid you not Belgravia and all speak English with a British accent like it's the Duchy of Grand Fenwick.
I think this is all rooted in one thing; the marriage of actress Grace Kelly to Rainier of Monaco, which is a 'tiny principality' (like, a square mile), filled with duck all but casinos, foreign tax exiles and yachts, and her story is seen as a real life fulfilment of all the Disney versions of Hans Christian Anderson's tales about commoners or hidden royalty marrying princes.

Not to mention there's no such thing as a constitutional monarchy and everyone is an absolute ruler who doesn't know any better but is secretly a sensitive artist or poet.
I'm not sure people who lap this Hallmark tit up even understand the difference between constitutional and absolute monarchies. But this fantasy being fixed on modern European absolute monarchs is weird, because there's not even a single absolute monarchy left in Europe unless you count Vatican City, and you can't marry the Pope. Other than that, there are only a handful left in the entire world, most of them being Muslim states where the King (or Emir, or Sultan) can have multiple wives - Saudi Arabia, Brunei, Oman and I think UAE counts, then there's Swaziland in southern Africa, where the king also has multiple wives, I think at last count 15, and which is basically famous for being poor and being devastated by AIDS. Not sure any of this fits the Hallmark fantasy! I mean, another beautiful US movie star - Rita Hayworth - married an esteemed and filthy rich Muslim son of a spiritual leader and a Prince - the Aga Khan's son Prince Aly Khan - but that one doesn't seem to have captured the imagination the same way. Partly because it was really unhappy and they divorced quickly, but eh.


The plucky American love him but his evil relatives plot to destroy her before she teaches ignorant, snobbish Europeans the joys of democracy, equality, being a career girl and milkshakes and saves the day and becomes a hybrid Princess/Lawyer/Dancer.
Which is again weird because all Europe's remaining monarchies exist in functioning democracies and most of them already marry non-royals these days, and people who have had *gasp* jobs!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 31
Several royal reporters have put out lists showing that it was impossible that she had only left the house twice in four months counting official engagements, known private outings, spa trips, trips to the Cotswolds (SoHo Farmhouse) and foreign holidays/jaunts to see friends. We also know because they told us that Ellen and Portia met them for a few pub lunches in Windsor and to admire Archie. The complains were because she was jaunting off to places half the time.

And that quote right there about a family member coming over and saying "lets lie low because you're everywhere." That proves that someone (possibly Sophie or Eugenie?) tried to come over and offer advice and be friendly and didn't want their meeting on the front pages of the tabloids to give them privacy. Maybe SHE didn't want to be on the front page of the MOS did you think about she felt Meghan? She always manages to turn any seemingly nice gesture or other people's concerns into a personal attack on her.

If her staff wasn't looking after her passport so they could be the ones to arrange the trips (which is part of their JOB) she would probably be complaining that she had to make her own arrangements and felt overwhelmed with it all and no one was showing her how to book in. Just like if she did have to "ask permission" to go out for lunch it was probably so her staff would know where she was or security could note it down and she'd complain that nobody was making sure she was safe.

She has never once admitted any single fault. Only being "naïve and trusting" which is a victim brag if such a thing exists. Couldn't even admit to jumping in too fast or something harmless like that.
At this stage, is it possible to name a single thing in that 'conversation' with Orca that was indisputably true? I'm waiting for a headline like 'All of it was tit, except this one little item.'

'She has never once admitted any single fault. Only being "naïve and trusting" which is a victim brag if such a thing exists. Couldn't even admit to jumping in too fast or something harmless like that.'
Yes! That tendency to self-victimisation and paranoid ideation - so typical. Not to mention creating the drama, deflecting the blame and leeching off the chaos. I remember that the narc in my life could never answer a question like 'Why did you do that?'. He would ignore it or look perplexed, despite huge destructive fall outs happening round his ears. No concept of self reflection. No insight whatsoever. No prospect of change.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 28
I bet they're mad it's leaked that it was Princess Anne. They wanted people to think it was Will or Kate. Their direct competition. Their big threat. It was carefully planned attempt to try and get will and Kate worldwide hated, cause a revolution, make sure they don't get to the throne and instead put the harkles on.
I strongly suspect that a palace * source * gave Lady C the go ahead to state publicly that it was Princess Anne who said it.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Heart
Reactions: 47
😉 This is the part in the movie where the Prince reveals that he's been cursed!

Polish_20210402_170840579.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 40
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 15
I bet they're mad it's leaked that it was Princess Anne. They wanted people to think it was Will or Kate. Their direct competition. Their big threat. It was carefully planned attempt to try and get will and Kate worldwide hated, cause a revolution, make sure they don't get to the throne and instead put the harkles on.
I think you're spot on here.
This is what confuses me. Who's behind this and what good would it do them if we got rid of the monarchy? It can't be M&H - they just wanna cash in on their titles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16
I think this is all rooted in one thing; the marriage of actress Grace Kelly to Rainier of Monaco, which is a 'tiny principality' (like, a square mile), filled with duck all but casinos, foreign tax exiles and yachts, and her story is seen as a real life fulfilment of all the Disney versions of Hans Christian Anderson's tales about commoners or hidden royalty marrying princes.



I'm not sure people who lap this Hallmark tit up even understand the difference between constitutional and absolute monarchies. But this fantasy being fixed on modern European absolute monarchs is weird, because there's not even a single absolute monarchy left in Europe unless you count Vatican City, and you can't marry the Pope. Other than that, there are only a handful left in the entire world, most of them being Muslim states where the King (or Emir, or Sultan) can have multiple wives - Saudi Arabia, Brunei, Oman and I think UAE counts, then there's Swaziland in southern Africa, where the king also has multiple wives, I think at last count 15, and which is basically famous for being poor and being devastated by AIDS. Not sure any of this fits the Hallmark fantasy! I mean, another beautiful US movie star - Rita Hayworth - married an esteemed and filthy rich Muslim son of a spiritual leader and a Prince - the Aga Khan's son Prince Aly Khan - but that one doesn't seem to have captured the imagination the same way. Partly because it was really unhappy and they divorced quickly, but eh.




Which is again weird because all Europe's remaining monarchies exist in functioning democracies and most of them already marry non-royals these days, and people who have had *gasp* jobs!
What a great post - thank you - extremely clear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 12
The AoC confirmed that "A couple already lawfully married cannot choose to re-marry each other unless there is some doubt as to the validity of the earlier marriage".
This is bugging me as I can see no reason why these liars and blackmailers should have had a number of pastoral and private meetings with the AoC in a "pastoral and private setting" as he says. I bet something was being hidden or changed, possibly illegal, that HMTQ didn't know about until later. Welby would have been bound by confidentiality not to tell her.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Heart
Reactions: 22
The AoC confirmed that "A couple already lawfully married cannot choose to re-marry each other unless there is some doubt as to the validity of the earlier marriage".
This is bugging me as I can see no reason why these liars and blackmailers should have had a number of pastoral and private meetings with the AoC in a "pastoral and private setting" as he says. I bet something was being hidden or changed, possibly illegal, that HMTQ didn't know about until later. Welby would have been bound by confidentiality not to tell her.
I'm not sure if Welby would be forbidden to tell HMQ as she's the head of the church. I can't see him risking it.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21
The AoC confirmed that "A couple already lawfully married cannot choose to re-marry each other unless there is some doubt as to the validity of the earlier marriage".
This is bugging me as I can see no reason why these liars and blackmailers should have had a number of pastoral and private meetings with the AoC in a "pastoral and private setting" as he says. I bet something was being hidden or changed, possibly illegal, that HMTQ didn't know about until later. Welby would have been bound by confidentiality not to tell her.
No - Welby is answerable to the Queen I am sure. Don't forget Smegma has operated under various different religions and maybe she hadn't fully converted to Christianity?
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21
The AoC confirmed that "A couple already lawfully married cannot choose to re-marry each other unless there is some doubt as to the validity of the earlier marriage".
This is bugging me as I can see no reason why these liars and blackmailers should have had a number of pastoral and private meetings with the AoC in a "pastoral and private setting" as he says. I bet something was being hidden or changed, possibly illegal, that HMTQ didn't know about until later. Welby would have been bound by confidentiality not to tell her.
In fairness, that is actually pretty standard with all CofE priests. There is virtually always an expectation that the couple will attend 6 or so marriage classes or meetings prior to the wedding to prove they’re serious about marriage. The only couple I know who had a Catholic wedding had to do the same thing. There’s plenty of tea in the whole wedding story but that one element isn’t suss, I don’t think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19
There's some fascinating posts on this thread about Agape which Orca and Dorito are part of:

It's well worth a read. Oprah has promoted 'the secret' a belief that you can manifest whatever you want.

'On one of the Secret shows, Oprah gave an example of the scientific power of the concept. She said that once, while she was hosting an episode about a man who could blow really big soap bubbles, she was thinking to herself, "Gee, that looks fun. I would like to blow some bubbles." When she returned to her office after the show, there, on her desk, was a silver Tiffany bubble blower. "So I call my assistant," Oprah told the audience. "I say, 'Did you just run out and get me some bubbles? 'Cause I got bubbles by my desk.' And she says, 'No, the bubbles were always there. I bought you bubbles for your birthday and you didn't notice them until today'."

There are many lessons that might be drawn from this anecdote. One is that if you give Oprah a thoughtful gift, she may not bother to notice it or thank you for it. This is not the lesson Oprah took away from her story. Because the way she sees it, her assistant hadn't really given her the gift at all. She gave it to herself. Using the power of The Secret, she said, "I had called in some bubbles."
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Wow
Reactions: 31
The AoC confirmed that "A couple already lawfully married cannot choose to re-marry each other unless there is some doubt as to the validity of the earlier marriage".
This is bugging me as I can see no reason why these liars and blackmailers should have had a number of pastoral and private meetings with the AoC in a "pastoral and private setting" as he says. I bet something was being hidden or changed, possibly illegal, that HMTQ didn't know about until later. Welby would have been bound by confidentiality not to tell her.
To be fair he was marrying them and they had marriage prep with him. He also baptised her and confirmed her - and event Prince Charles was said to be at supporting her BTW so she would have had classes of some sort with him then as well. It's not surprising that they were in close contact with him. And having the AoC on call is a perk of the BRF in general I think.

I don't know if he knows or did anything that he shouldn't have done but he keeps repeating that he knows he would be in trouble if he had married them twice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
This website is excellent! It has loads of pictures and gifs I've never seen before. Like this 😳
Once you've seen how fake that pregnancy was you just can't unsee it!
I'm amazed that anyone still believes that she gave birth to Archiedoll.
She's faking again this time. It's obvious in the chicken coop sequence as well with the high bump but she manages to crouch down in the coop.
Oprah probably wouldn't suspect as she doesn't have any children.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Haha
Reactions: 29
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.