ha ha ha this made me laugh looool 
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Yes, Sue Smith video covered this too.
It's a good while since I was pregnant, but I definitely did not spend all the time with my hand or hands on my bump! When the baby was kicking, I certainly put my hand on it, but not the rest of the time.
i have acknowledged your pain.
I am contrite.
I promise to put it behind a spoiler next time.
If Charles isn't his father then either a, hats off to him for putting up with the miserable complaining git or b, now's the time to hit the ejector seat good and proper then ginge and whinge an do whatever the duck they like. See how long before she divorces him if he turns out to be a commoner.Do you know what, I think he does look like Charles and is getting more like him as he gets olderdon't shoot me
Imagine needing to start a telephone conversation with a grandchild with āCan you assure me this conversation is not being recorded?ā I mean dear lord....Iām not even a royalist but that poor woman
No amount of money, titles, or privilege can protect you from the pain of a family rift.
Last edited:
I have a theory tattlers, on the Piers V MeAgain saga and Iād be interested in your thoughts.
initially Piers wrote raving reviews about Meghan. This piece was written in November 2017, around the time of their engagement announcement. I believe it refers to a meeting in June 2016, which is right before hazbeen and Migraine allegedly started dating.
www.dailymail.co.uk
He talks about how clever, intelligent and stunning she is. Itās rather nauseating, and not really Piersā style. Itās a similar style of fawning that Omid Scobie uses. More to the point, it makes two things clear
Fast forward a year later and itās a totally different story. Itās the same scenario, same drink in a pub, but with a totally different slant. Piersā version of events if you will. I think he wanted to get the ārealā version of events out.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...social-climbing-actress-used-getting-way.html
I think Meghan approached Piers to ask for help with boosting her profile now that she was dating Prince Harry. (Liz cundie wrote a article where Meghan approached her asking to be introduced to a rich British man, so stands to reason she would do something similar with piers and others) She mentioned the single thing because she was worried her cheating on Cory with Harry would come to light.
When she was married she no longer needed his help to boost her profile, so she ditched him.
What I think really gripes piers, and something he doesnāt mention, was just how much heād been used. I think she essentially wrote the first article or at least closely collaborated on it, and he finds it galling that he fell for it and was complicit in her deceit. He thought itād be a mutually beneficial arrangement where heād boost her popularity and sheād give him a foot in the door to buddy up with the palace and Harry. Problem is she never held up her side of the bargain.
I think thatās why he has such a vendetta against her - he has experienced first hand just how calculated and ruthless she is, he knows first hand, but he canāt own up to it without bringing his own rep as a journalist into question.
initially Piers wrote raving reviews about Meghan. This piece was written in November 2017, around the time of their engagement announcement. I believe it refers to a meeting in June 2016, which is right before hazbeen and Migraine allegedly started dating.
PIERS: Congrats, Harry, but your romance ruined my Meghan friendship
His Royal āNaked Billiardsā Highness is at last settling down and getting married. I was delighted when I heard the news, not least because his bride-to-be is a friend. Or was, anyway.
He talks about how clever, intelligent and stunning she is. Itās rather nauseating, and not really Piersā style. Itās a similar style of fawning that Omid Scobie uses. More to the point, it makes two things clear
- It mentions that bloody soap commercial that Meghan LOVES to bring up
- It explicitly states that Meghan was single.
Fast forward a year later and itās a totally different story. Itās the same scenario, same drink in a pub, but with a totally different slant. Piersā version of events if you will. I think he wanted to get the ārealā version of events out.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...social-climbing-actress-used-getting-way.html
I think Meghan approached Piers to ask for help with boosting her profile now that she was dating Prince Harry. (Liz cundie wrote a article where Meghan approached her asking to be introduced to a rich British man, so stands to reason she would do something similar with piers and others) She mentioned the single thing because she was worried her cheating on Cory with Harry would come to light.
When she was married she no longer needed his help to boost her profile, so she ditched him.
What I think really gripes piers, and something he doesnāt mention, was just how much heād been used. I think she essentially wrote the first article or at least closely collaborated on it, and he finds it galling that he fell for it and was complicit in her deceit. He thought itād be a mutually beneficial arrangement where heād boost her popularity and sheād give him a foot in the door to buddy up with the palace and Harry. Problem is she never held up her side of the bargain.
I think thatās why he has such a vendetta against her - he has experienced first hand just how calculated and ruthless she is, he knows first hand, but he canāt own up to it without bringing his own rep as a journalist into question.
I wouldn't be surprised if they have state of the art scrambler phones. Not just to disguise locations but to make sure that calls can't be recorded. If HMTQ didn't have one before she'll definitely have one now.Imagine needing to start a telephone conversation with a grandchild with āCan you assure me this conversation is not being recorded?ā I mean dear lord....Iām not even a royalist but that poor woman
You know how people have 'types'?
Horrible Haz looks exactly like the RF men, but also like James Hewitt and Spencer colouring.
To me that suggests Diana liked a certain type, and any appearance similarities are just coincidence.
Horrible Haz looks exactly like the RF men, but also like James Hewitt and Spencer colouring.
To me that suggests Diana liked a certain type, and any appearance similarities are just coincidence.
On the previous thread to this there were many comments about which RF member made the racist comment about H&M's baby. It's unclear whether this comment was made when they got engaged, when she was pregnant with Farchy or indeed if the comment was made at all. Such an insult but Hazzno doesn't have a clue.
What I want to know is that with the evidence that Minge had a moonbump and was never pregnant, why is this racism comment is being given any credence? No wonder Hazzno looked shifty and unsure. It never happened.
Ditto a title for Farchy, lots of comments on the thread about what he would be called.
If there was a surrogate (and I don't believe there was) such child would not be given a title even when Charles becomes king. If Farchy was theirs he would have a title.
Rather than appear to concede that a racist remark was made about a baby, the RF need to deal with this or let the press uncover it. Deal with this issue and the whole lot will unravel.
Not a good idea to say it will be dealt with privately which seems like a cover up, and ditto worse to throw Andrew under the bus just because he's in a mess already,
The video of Farchy walking along the sand was very strange, he looked like a gnome.
Am I missing something here? Can someone please explain?
What I want to know is that with the evidence that Minge had a moonbump and was never pregnant, why is this racism comment is being given any credence? No wonder Hazzno looked shifty and unsure. It never happened.
Ditto a title for Farchy, lots of comments on the thread about what he would be called.
If there was a surrogate (and I don't believe there was) such child would not be given a title even when Charles becomes king. If Farchy was theirs he would have a title.
Rather than appear to concede that a racist remark was made about a baby, the RF need to deal with this or let the press uncover it. Deal with this issue and the whole lot will unravel.
Not a good idea to say it will be dealt with privately which seems like a cover up, and ditto worse to throw Andrew under the bus just because he's in a mess already,
The video of Farchy walking along the sand was very strange, he looked like a gnome.
Am I missing something here? Can someone please explain?
Nice detective work, FarringdonI have a theory tattlers, on the Piers V MeAgain saga and Iād be interested in your thoughts.
initially Piers wrote raving reviews about Meghan. This piece was written in November 2017, around the time of their engagement announcement. I believe it refers to a meeting in June 2016, which is right before hazbeen and Migraine allegedly started dating.
PIERS: Congrats, Harry, but your romance ruined my Meghan friendship
His Royal āNaked Billiardsā Highness is at last settling down and getting married. I was delighted when I heard the news, not least because his bride-to-be is a friend. Or was, anyway.
He talks about how clever, intelligent and stunning she is. Itās rather nauseating, and not really Piersā style. Itās a similar style of fawning that Omid Scobie uses. More to the point, it makes two things clear
My theory is that Meghan was sucking up to piers, maybe offered him exclusives, in exchange for writing a glow-up review of her. I think she wouldāve asked for the above two things to be included in the piece. She isnāt above doing this, as the finding freedom book supposedly written by Scobie, has clearly been heavily influenced by Meghan. So Meghan isnāt above using journalists and broadcasters as her mouthpieces. If anything itās her modus operandi in her attempts to frame a narrative where she is a wonderful goddess amongst mere mortals.
- It mentions that bloody soap commercial that Meghan LOVES to bring up
- It explicitly states that Meghan was single.
Fast forward a year later and itās a totally different story. Itās the same scenario, same drink in a pub, but with a totally different slant. Piersā version of events if you will. I think he wanted to get the ārealā version of events out.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...social-climbing-actress-used-getting-way.html
I think Meghan approached Piers to ask for help with boosting her profile now that she was dating Prince Harry. (Liz cundie wrote a article where Meghan approached her asking to be introduced to a rich British man, so stands to reason she would do something similar with piers and others) She mentioned the single thing because she was worried her cheating on Cory with Harry would come to light.
When she was married she no longer needed his help to boost her profile, so she ditched him.
What I think really gripes piers, and something he doesnāt mention, was just how much heād been used. I think she essentially wrote the first article or at least closely collaborated on it, and he finds it galling that he fell for it and was complicit in her deceit. He thought itād be a mutually beneficial arrangement where heād boost her popularity and sheād give him a foot in the door to buddy up with the palace and Harry. Problem is she never held up her side of the bargain.
I think thatās why he has such a vendetta against her - he has experienced first hand just how calculated and ruthless she is, he knows first hand, but he canāt own up to it without bringing his own rep as a journalist into question.
Looked like a gnome
Have ye seen this
The milage is gonna be huge with this one
The milage is gonna be huge with this one
She's making sure it doesn't slip down round her knees again. It was around the same time, bar a day or two, that picture of her in the red/purple dress & coat appeared where she had 'something' hanging between her legs.
On this pic she has lovely hair! What was she wearing on that interview?!
I just read this - very interesting!! Thank you
Posted by
amethyst_unicorn
in the previous thread.
This BROKE me.
We all know where this is going.
Donāt be too hard on the RF. He is their grandson, son, brother...
And he is broken.
It even broke me!
amethyst_unicorn
in the previous thread.
This BROKE me.
We all know where this is going.
Donāt be too hard on the RF. He is their grandson, son, brother...
And he is broken.
It even broke me!
I agree. If you see photos of Prince Philip as a very young man he and Harry are very alike.
- Status