And at the CoA is it correct that it wont be Warby overseeing it?
And at the CoA is it correct that it wont be Warby overseeing it?He’s refused leave to appeal so is proceeding as if the issue had never been mentioned. That’a normal.
When they file with the CoA, ANL will apply for a stay on all orders...and will probably get them. If the CoA refuses to hear the appeal then the stays will be lifted.
That is what i thought! I do think it is him though, even if it isn't they wont comment on it as it makes for a good distraction... Sugars are lapping it up its making me feel sick (King Archie etc), some are even more Vile bringing the 'Ugly Cambridge Kids' in to their vile comments (i have reported several accounts)If that is Archie, he looks big for 22 months? He's the size of my almost 3 year old!
Sure they want us to think its him... would she not to ask for Meg's permission (or instruction) , else surely invading her privacy!
What a lovely memory to have of the Queen. When I think of both of my own grandmothers I wouldn’t dare treat either of them in the way H has treated his in the past few years. Does he not understand she will not be around forever & that if he really wanted out & had respect all of this could have waited just a few more years. The Queen has herself gone thru so much during her life & always done so with grace. Why must the last few years of her life be possibly some of the most treacherous for the monarchy all brought on by 2 spoilt entitled brats?I am the same as you - saw the cracks early on because I read the background stuff on her. My hubs now totally agrees. I have never been interested in the monarchy in any particular way - I'd watch the weddings maybe. But this has brought out a whole other side of me and I am very angry for the Queen. I saw her when I was a child and she drove through Epsom on her way to the racecourse. She was wearing that Barbie pink muppet outfit. I am now so angry on her behalf and her immediate family that I would happily smother Smeghan so she could never tell another untruth.
Didnt he say in their engagement interview that he tried to explain royal life and procedures and protocols? She obviously wasnt listeningIt seems that Harry obviously didn’t make it clear what Meg should expect from life as a royal if she thought she’d just be able to give interview after interview to raise her profile.
This is what she's said instead "Meghan ....claims the palace is using Prince Philip's health as an 'excuse to keep her muzzled' I am too angry to breathe right now.I can’t believe she and Harry haven’t even issued a public statement to say they hope Prince Philip has a speedy recovery and that he is in their thoughts. How is this not even being mentioned? It really is all about ‘me, me, me’
the comments on that postHer “friend” silvertreedirector just posted a photo of Archie on her Instagram
Is that Smeggy in that picture. She has massive hands like a mole! To go with her big troll feetHer “friend” silvertreedirector just posted a photo of Archie on her Instagram
Looking at those pictures, Ms SilverTreeDirector is a friend of Lindsey Jane Roth so there's a connection, and her 'spontaneous post of support to our dear leader Megz' is straight out of North Korea. Ms Silver seems to have two children, seen on the sofa with Megz.Well that's interesting! Suddenly we are allowed to see Archie! How odd. Did Smeggy agree for that to be released or will she be sueing them ?
My daughter was like that, at age two she was three-feet tall. A couple of people had said me if you double their height at age two you'll have the height they'll be when they finish growing. She eventually leveled out at 5-8.If that is Archie, he looks big for 22 months? He's the size of my almost 3 year old!
Sure they want us to think its him... would she not to ask for Meg's permission (or instruction) , else surely invading her privacy!
Deliciousfrom twitter
There is no such thing as a spontaneous, accidental Instagram post of the unicorn child Archie. So this is just part of the PR build up to the Sunday show.I think if it is Archie then the press will be all over it. They may have to verify it but I think we will know soon enough.
In true Narc fashion, she is in fact telling us what she would do if in the same position.Ew. She's actually disgusting. Saying that the RF are USING Philips ill health as a reason for her not to talk.
Meghan Markle would 'never' postpone the tell-all Oprah interview
A Hollywood insider with ties to the Sussexes tells DailyMail.com, 'Even if Meghan had the choice to postpone the Oprah special she said she wouldn't'.www.dailymail.co.uk
I’m a lawyer (not in privacy/human rights) but I still can’t understand how the judge came to the decision to award Smeggy summary judgment based on the particular facts of that case. How could he definitively decide about MM’s legitimate expectation of privacy without (a) hearing evidence from the Palace staff about the degree of input into the letter (b) hearing evidence from the 5 ‘People friends’ about what Smeggy told them about the letter (c) hearing evidence from Thomas Markle about his legitimate reasons for disclosing the letter to the press and, most importantly (d) hearing cross-examination of MM about why she shared the letter with staff and her friends, why she wrote it in calligraphy (because she knew it would get published), why it is written to emphasise how amazing she is (because she knew it would get published) and why she thought her father would keep it private when the whole point of the letter was about how her father couldn’t keep away from the press.She’s got her way, full front page spread in daily mail I cannot believe it
Mail on Sunday sorry
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?