Dan Wootten has tweeted on his twitter. He reported about the bullying first.
They were told to take that six week break in Canada, I'm convinced. Then they jumped before they were pushed. But they were after a fully-funded Commonwealth Court in Canada and a luxury property in Los Angeles with all their Royal status and perks intact.I’m starting to think that they didn’t choose to leave the Royal Family but were told to leave. That’s why they ensured they announced it first. If they chose to leave then why are they so bitter? They got what they wanted.
No, I really believe they were told to go.
Oh and for Meghantoinette and her fans, here’s food for thought...
View attachment 466357
No.....I dont think they are expected to wear them at all ...they are expected to send them back unworn!Just finished reading the Rebecca English piece in the DM
I have a question about the other story in the news today about M kicking off because she wasn’t allowed to keep the designer freebies she was sent. I had no idea that wasn’t allowed and always assumed they kept whatever they were sent and subsequently wore. So are they expected to wear it, give the brand their exposure and then send the garments back?
I love how all this is getting raked up again. Remember the one where she accused the Queen's chef of using egg in a vegan dish?Dan Wootten has tweeted on his twitter. He reported about the bullying first.
I have heard first hand of him being horrible to staff at Babbington HouseIt's also worth noting that their first interview since leaving, James Corden (sorry Oprah), was with someone with an appealing reputation for how he treats people.
I agree - they were told to go and 'take a good long hard look at themselves'.They were told to take that six week break in Canada, I'm convinced. Then they jumped before they were pushed. But they were after a fully-funded Commonwealth Court in Canada and a luxury property in Los Angeles with all their Royal status and perks intact.
Oh I seeeeeNo.....I dont think they are expected to wear them at all ...they are expected to send them back unworn!
Surely, Its to avoid all allegations of bribery... of being seen to favour one company rather than another.
If you think of a well known brand vs a less well known start up company, how is it fair to favour the rich and established company just because one company has the money to pay for freebies and the other start up company doesnt.
And there are also probably issues with quantity...the royal family doesnt want a room full of primark freebies that have been sent, along with the Christian Dior or Stella McCartney ..freebies...
And political favouritism...... Would it be a good idea to wear shoes as designed for Imelda Marcos
And issues around sustainable fabrics and furs.......etc.......
So its much better to not get involved at all!!
Are you sure about this?What Kate apparently does for example is she will have a 95% reduction on things she wants as this gets around the problem of being gifted by designers
Our smart tv does not have RTE , how I love that tvTwo hours of the Moaning Martyr of Montecito has been picked up by RTE for Ireland - but just on RTE2.
ETA Thank you @Bubblesdahling and @NutMegandCinnamong for the shiny new thread![]()
The Times bullying story was in the works for several weeks. Megz team were aware of it and looks like they used the Oprah interview to suggest BP are lying about them.I'm not sure if this has been discussed as yet, but Muggsy says in the clip - 'I don't know how they could expect that after all of this time we would still just be silent if there is an active role that The Firm is playing in perpetuating falsehoods about us'.
What exactly could she be referring to?? - something specific?? Or is it just her trying to dramatise how long she's been a victim?