Is the situation as it stands :They just want to keep shit stirring... because it makes them money.
It definitely seems strange that out of all the flights that were departing from Heathrow around that time the Los Angeles flight was the only one that was delayed.That's some delay. I wonder what caused it?
Maybe an unruly passenger who was drunk / stoned upon boarding, and / or who made a scene because he wasn't happy with the seat he'd been allocated. And when the cabin crew - trying to keep the peace - asked another passenger who was already seated to swop, and they declined and stated loudly that they "wouldn't give that drug-addled leach the steam off his piss", caused the first passenger to slur loudly "Do you know who I am?", and then the seated passenger said "Yes, you treacherous cunt. So sit where you're put or I'll chin you." And then it all kicked off, and took hours to sort out.
Bet I'm not far wrong.
The one good thing about these vomitatious articles is the hope that the Dastardly Duo read them avidly and then carry on to read the comments.Headlines are driving me mad, but the comments give me hope that most people can see through this
This is why William is hiring a CEO and the media hates it because that would mean a different approach. Especially when it comes to leaks and communications.There needs to be a thorough, realistic, dynamic appraisal and assessment of RF role, functions, staffing needs, resourcing, contingency planning - all the things that would be looked at and updated periodically in any public service. (I'm not sure their courtiers etc have the necessary knowledge/experience - many of them come from the military, which isn't a public service, and haven't run businesses or major public services. This appraisal should be informed by opinions from the public, public services and bodies, charities etc etc.
There should never be any such thing as 'spares' which is a truly terrible designation for any human being. It's been horribly demonstrated (Andy and Haz) that things can go terribly wrong when younger/junior members are demoralised, minimised and left to their own devices.
Each family member should have a designated role and training from birth with an option to become a private citizen when they finish their education.
That would be the optimists spin.I think we can all agree that Prince William has shown that he will do what he wants to do.
If he wants to call out his godmother for inappropriate behaviour, he will do it. If he tells the Queen he won't attend something (Garter day, I think?) if Andrew does, he means it. If he wants to modernise communications, he will. If he wants to have a CEO instead of the usual men in grey, he will. If he doesn't want to be the Head of the Commonwealth, my guess is, he won't be.
The media has been trying to get him and Kate to do 500 engagements a year since they got married. They don't. The media goads him to react to Harry. He remains silent. They wanted him to sue after Scobie, but he remained silent. They wanted him to respond to Scobie, he didn't.
That doesn't mean he is completely stubborn though, sometimes he listens. For example, taking Andrew to church. But even the Queen sometimes relented.
The media is losing this fight and they know it. This is why they are begging for Harry to return. A reconciliation. But if the media is pushing it, my guess is, it won't happen. Ever.
Excellent point. Harold was exposed to a plethora of germs. The last wanted is for KC to catch somethingfrom a medical point of view would Dr's not advice against him being there while the King is receiving his treatment, whose to say Hapless was kept at more than arms length, face masked etc especially when he has been travelling on a plane, so easy to pick up bugs on a plane and spread them on
especially when Beatrice was seen at Clarence House earlier in the day!Totally, this has business transaction written all over it.
That’s why they didn’t offer the guest room at Clarence House to him. They knew he would take the towels.Has anyone checked the valuables at Clarence House? I wouldn’t put it past that fucker to steal something.
That would be the optimists spin.
Which may occasionally work.
When consequences don't happen .
After consequences happen however, it was just a temporary ''good will'' action from the media that gives a ''ego kibble'' of a good article .
The secret is ''hidden in a box.'' IIRC Harry mentioned this somewhere without explanation .(which is good)
Lady Susan (example)... will bite him in the ass at least another 4-5 times during his reign.
Same as everything else.
The complexity of this isn't visible in the ''now'' the current information is played around the instant validation for the targeted audience. The audience changes.
William however (as the actual human behind this, screw the King part, the privileeedge part, the power part) has to deal with this on psychological levels , as a person, husband , father.
Also his motives and a different perspective :
Yeah, ''modernising communication '' with Harry breathing in his neck, and potentially Parliament .
Snubbing Andrew , yeah a bit of image polish, did you miss the Bliar incident ?
Lady Susan called out on ''inappropriate behavior '' then looking like tantrum Willy after Harry's reaction , and their reconciliation .
They are still ''workshy Willy and do not Kate.''
If one of their children ever in any form gets photographed (like Louis) once older in any way other then perfect, the media will have fun, lots of fun.
It's the box. Always .
But…if money was involved there is no guarantee that he won’t reneg. He is a liar and untrustworthy and he might hedge his bet that they won’t go after him legally because it would cause The King embarrassment I hope it was nothing financial in return for shutting up.Totally, this has business transaction written all over it.
Here's a funny one for you:Is the situation as it stands :
William wants nothing to do with his Stoat brother, doesn't give a toss what the press thinks, is fiercely protective of his family, and puts the Monarchy first.
The Stoat says he'd like to meet William, is dangerous and treacherous, and if he and his slapper could get rid of those in his way, he would. Puts himself first.
Chuck keeps his options open, keeps the balls in the air. By refusing to condemn the Sussexes wrongdoing he supports them and undermines the Wales family to protect himself. Uses the shield of loving father. Now ill, but he was doing this before he was ill. Puts himself first.
The public recognised long ago the danger the Sussexes pose to our Monarchy, and askd year in year out for them to be stripped of their power. The Monarch ignores the public.
The "obstacle" is William, who puts the Monarchy first.
If Chuck continues to call the shots, we could limp on for a long time with this toxic farce. For the sake of the Monarchy he should get a grip and stop flirting like a geriatric courtesan with both sides... beloved heir... beloved DIL... darling boy. Pick a lane Chuck and get in it before even more damage is done. Put the Monarchy first.
On every occasion Chuck has ducked the Stoat issue, helicoptered out, run away, "busy".
It's divide and rule, good cop bad cop, and very obviously No Family Unity. Not good.
The Stoat's alleged 45 minute meeting with his father wasn't funny at all, more smoke and mirrors.
It's not the press directing these reconciliation articles, it's the Palace imo.
Or, he has told Harry and said that if it gets to the press I shall hold you responsible and there will be consequences.
Giving him a deservedAre the 1,496 people tracking that flight all tattlers? lol
TBH I feel the same about HRH. Regardless of my support of the monarchy “highness” always annoys meJust the term 'VIP' tells you how proposterous these rich ego-maniacs are. People aren't 'more important' based on how much money they have in their bank account. I know it's only a small thing, but things like that wind me up. And no, I'm not a raving communist.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?