Harry and Meghan #287 Meet the Haznos. Papa Haznobrains, Mama Haznoclass, Bro Haznomates and Sis Haznolegs

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Wild teenage parties and weed won't shift his Memoir, so boring and normal these days. He could drag up Rose Hanbury but that's risky. Jealous ginger turd could never snag someone like her anyway.
How vile if he's going to deliver broadsides at Catherine. It's like attacking a puppy.

If anything, it is going to make William seem relatable. Just like the yelling at his dumb sibling did.


This tweet is on that thread, can you imagine the looks on their faces when they realise Aunty Ann has dropped by? I’d love it to be true.

Who is Aunty Ann? Princess Anne? If so, why do they think she went to Cali.

Sorry, I'm still groggy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 23
That's the understatement of the year and we're only 7hrs in. :LOL: Harry is thick as tit, mean, spoilt, entitled. Unattractive in every single sense of the word. I bet without maids and housekeepers their house would be a bleeping pile of tit, both of them seem anal-expulsive and lazy to me. Hazno is a clueless spiteful prick with a chip and she's a divisive psychotic cow. I hate them and I hope they both whither on the vine ... in her case, Sunset and Vine turning-tricks in the backseat of a Honda.
But what do you really think??
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 29
This is a great poem about the reeks,very dark,very Game of Thrones...https://youtu.be/ufaNGQfHMAM


Link may not work,it's called the liars by Joseph Charles Mackenzie on youtube
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 20
I agree, especially if they remain in the LOS. Malignant Narcs - which at least she definitely is and he is a facilitator - are sadists and seek the demise of their targets. My Narc Ex - diagnosed by not one but 2 clinical psychologists as a malignant narc very high on the malignant narc spectrum, bordereing on serial killer - spent our marriage using me as his foil to establish dominance and his absolute superiority. Until I finally threw him out and filed for divorce, at which point absolute revenge was his raison d'etre. for 15 years nonstop. He wanted me dead. He wanted me to off myself and went at it nonstop through reputational assaults, harassment, threats (daily), repeatedly taking me to court for whatever reason was good that months (averaging 3times a year for most of those 15 years). Fabricating claims to social workers, stalking.... Last I saw him was in the ER as my eldest had been injured playing rugby. as I walked down the hallway to where my child was, my nex was walking behind me making Joker laughing sounds. the doctors in the ER noticed his bizarre behaviour and finally asked him to leave. He threw a fit and was escorted out and I was asked if I was safe to go home or needed a police escoort. Smegs is that level of crazee. I have always feared for the safety of the Cambridges and their kids.
How did you finally get him to stop harassing you?
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 19
Interesting…

Who knew the specifics of a Coronation?
Looks like Hazza will have to think this one though.
No laughing at the back there, Missus, he’s doing his best.


This article and the options it presents are a bit lovely. The only thing I finding concerning is if he renounces his duke title he is still a prince by birth, which gives them the right to use that title I believe?
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 16
Not sure whether we saw this at the beginning of November?

Screenshot 2023-01-01 at 15.55.54.png
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Heart
Reactions: 32
How did you finally get him to stop harassing you?
a couple things 1) the last court case was soo egregious and he was litigant in Person to save costs, that the judge listened to nex claims and demands and judge made it clear that he didn't believe his claims and would hold him to a veeeery high standard of evidence etc. He then announced that he would deputize himself (which he did right then and there, in the court room) to the High Court because he himself wanted to see it play out and make the judgment. The asshole visibly panicked and then the judge added that if nex did not meet the judge's standard of proof etc, he would rule against the nex and make him pay not just all my legal expense but even consider damages, as he was one case away from being deemed "vexatious litigant". NEx pooped himself and wiithdrew the application. 2) I was the greyest of greyrocks. I had cut off all means of contact and communication so he took me to court to force me to communicate with him (yeah). I had an IDVA (Independent Domestic Abuse Advocate) read the emails as they would cause me major panic attacks. the IDVA and I would agree if a response was necessary and what iit should be but she kept an eye on if it was swaying into abuse or threat territory and would add that to the very long report that the police had on him. It was interesting as he was a suspect in a viiolent assault that took place in our part of London on a lady who looked like me. They never managed to prove it (or catch the perp) but he was prime suspect not just because of the physical similarites but the behaviour specialists thought the record they had on him suggested psychopathy. He still doesn't know about his record as it is protected under Domestic Abuse protocol. 3) I lost my job and so he knew he coould no longer try to come after me for maintenance/other money and 4) our child that was sadly the plaform for his years of attacks turned 18 and that was it. No more grounds for anything. He timed out. It was insidious and tbh the legal system is wildly abused like this very very often. It is an actual tactic that Father4Justice train their members on. I've seen it. It is awful.

ETA - in April 2021, I believe, a law regarding this sort of abuse was passed to help stop women (who are 90% of the time the targets/victims). It is deemed Post-separation Abuse and was added to the Domestic Abuse Act, I think (am not a lawyer) but iit is still early days and judges are not trauma informed and not yet properly trained regarding this new law. Although Charlotte Proudman is a loud defeneder of Smegs and believes the Sugar Campaign that poor Smegs is a victim, Proudman was also instrumental in the drafting and passing of this law.

There are dedicated support groups for victims of this kind of abuse.

As in this case the targets are his father AND his brother, there is no real expiration point. Slag and her handbag could very well do this for decades. I firmly believe that her main gripe is that she wasn't allowed to barge to the front of the queue and grab the top table and be appointed Queen, like she did and does with restaurants. I firmly believe the "one plane crash away from the throne" story and because TQ didn't abdicate and usher her ahead of Chuck and Wills to become Queen (as absurd as that it is to even imagine - but she is absurd), she is seeking her revenge and the demise of the monarchy. She wanted them to modernise the monarchy to change the rules so that she wouldn't have to bow to literally anyone and that the new rules would put her on the throne and have everyone bowing to her.
 
Last edited:
  • Heart
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 50
This tweet is on that thread, can you imagine the looks on their faces when they realise Aunty Ann has dropped by? I’d love it to be true.
Found the link:

 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: 27
Well, only just over a week to go and we'll see what sort of backbone KC3 actually has.

If it's true that the Waleses (particularly William) are the target, and he and Camilla emerge fairly unscathed in comparison, what will he do? Breathe a sigh of relief, give titles to the Flatpacks, give the Harkles a relatively prominent role in the Coronation, and to hell with how hurt William and Catherine are?

Or will he publicly defend his heirs, William and George, from an increasingly bitter, resentful Sparry?

And if he doesn't do the latter, then why on earth should William pledge allegiance at the Coronation to someone who won't stick up for him?

I know this may sound harsh, but if it's true that KC3 has ongoing concerns about Hazza's mental health situation, that should be a private, family matter.

It should not mean that Hazza is free to take potshots at the RF, the media and the country in general, and attempt to disrupt the CW, with no pushback other than vague platitudes and the distraction of some amusing seating arrangements. All because KC3 may be reluctant to deal with it head-on. The UK cannot and should not be held to ransom like that. Where will it end? You can't carry on kicking the can down the road, in the vain hope you'll be left alone while everyone else goes under the bus. That's not the mark of a leader. It's cowardice.

If KC3 wants to make Hazza's wellbeing his main priority, then I hope he understands that it's not also the country's/Government's priority. If he can't separate the two, then he should do the decent thing, step down, and let William take over.

I hope KC3 steps up and makes the right choice, but I shan't be holding my breath.

JMO
Well said. This is what Harry Markle Wordpress posted recently. KC is putting his "concerns" about the Stoat being tipped over the edge because of his MH issues. Putting these concerns ahead of the Commonwealth, the RF members and public opinion. The narrative of a loving father who wants his son home despite everything, repeated at intervals in the press.

I don't believe this to be true, and think it's an excuse for inaction. Hence the carrot-dangling about the fake childrens' titles, allowing other RF members and their children to be trashed, rolling over submissively and effectively admitting that the RF is racist to bullies like Ngozi. Allowing Boozy and Aphid to prosper..... But leave Cam alone, please.

Neither BookWorm nor Harry Markle address the question Why? They stop there, though Tom Bower was braver and said Blackmail. Everybody avoids it maybe for fear of the can of worms, as the can of worms would be far far worse for the RF than the Stoats.
Hence the press injunction (which is slowly unravelling.)

They also have the racism weapon.

I believe the Stoats now want it to unravel, so they posted the rash of ludicrous so-false photos of children, the so-false moonbump, nothing adding up. Designed to arouse suspicion. The RF will have viewed with alarm all these dodgy photos after recent Flatpack absence. Where does this leave them, who christened one of them? The Stoats set it up from the start to ultimately unravel.

If the Stoats had wanted to keep their fake children secret, they could easily have done so. Gone and lived quietly in the US as they tricked the RF into believing they did. Now they're ready and they want money, and I've always said it comes back to the children.

Childless, they are nothing. With 2 fakes claimed as Royal by the RF, seen by The Queen and current King, and in the LoS without being checked out - bingo.

Expose the moonbump and the Stoats will come back with an RF racist genetic bullying story. The RF are deeply compromised and don't know how to extricate themselves. Medical health confidentiality won't work as the Stoats were working Royals and the RF broke the rules. Broke the rules and added layer upon layer of concealment to hide the scam, and now the layers are coming off because the Stoats want them to come off.
Look at the South Africa trip.

The Stoats won't care. They have nothing to lose and a back-up answer for every one of their lies. The RF have everything to lose, and bearing in mind that this has been going on since 2019, it doesn't look as though the MiG have any solutions.
Convoluted thinking but it's what I've always believed, and as time goes on nothing has changed my mind. The opposite in fact.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Sick
Reactions: 27
Interesting…

Who knew the specifics of a Coronation?
Looks like Hazza will have to think this one though.
No laughing at the back there, Missus, he’s doing his best.

ooooooo this is delish. I mean absolutely succulent (makes HAnnibal Lecture Fava Beans and Chianti sucking sounds)
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 22
I can't imagine what they can say about P and PoW or KC and Camilla, really if its defamatory it won't get past the lawyers and there will be blow back. I'm sure Hazenoballs has said the RF won't sue or go to court, but will the lawyers for Penguin risk this? I don't think so.
Also, we've heard that no paper is going to serialise the book, which could mean all the papers are not prepared to print some of its claptrap. Some mags might highlight extracts, maybe pro Harkle publications.

I think it will boring! all about how naughty he was as a child/teenager/young man. and how much he loved is mum and how awful it was to walk behind her coffin, how awful the men in grey were to him, how the military was marvellous and his "luv " story with Markle. Will it tell us something we don't already know, I'm not convinced it will .

I think all the bad vibes and negative comments in then book by H on the RF is all hype. only a handful of days left before all is revealed. I'm not buying it even if its in the bargain basket already at Tescos ;)
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 34
Only if it can be proven she did it with malice and aforethought.
Per the US Supreme Court, the standard for public figures to recover for defamation is “actual malice.” That standard refers to the defendant’s knowledge of the truth or falsity of the statement. I think it could be fairly easy to prove she had knowledge of the falsity of any statements that she just made up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 23
Found the link:

Apparently as she walked across the tarmac to the plane (carrying her own luggage) all the ground staff, cabin crew and pilot got down on their knees with their foreheads touching the ground and chanted “Thank you Ma’am for all you do”
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 45
Another great trick narcs like Rachel are able to play is to make YOU look like the narc. I started to question my own behaviour at one point with a 'situation' with someone. Geezus.
absolutely. He outright claimed that I had been diagnosed as a narc. He repeatedly claimed this to social workers and in each and every court application. When asked to prove it, he claimed that the psychologist who diagnosed me wouldn't share the diagnosis due to patient doctor privilege so the claim stuck and my lawyers cost too much money to have them focus on those fabrications. Gaslighting 101 / projecting.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Sad
Reactions: 36
Happy new year all. Hungover and minorly injured - must have been a good night! Can't wait to see how 2023 goes for the Markles....
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 22
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.