I'm trying to give the benefit of the doubt here, maybe it's Chris helping? Or her dad?
Shitty of her if it's TB but I'm hoping we're jumping to conclusions...
Given TB was tagged in the bookshelf and drinks photo (completely unnecessarily other than to tell us he was there and had a drink too
) prior to the bath boast, it's a fair assumption to make that he's the one "helping with" (completing) bedtime with those two poor kids.
Re
@sallybreadsticks safeguarding issue point - I wouldn't say I was disputing it being an issue previously, though maybe you put me in that bracket
I doubted it met thresholds which is a different thing. It probably still doesn't, rightly or wrongly - it's left to a parents' discretion who they trust with their children because SS cannot supervise and vet every private decision parents make.
It could be reported to SS but unless TB has convictions or is on the SO register, was drunk or under the influence of drugs, or indeed did something abusive towards the children while unsupervised it would be closed almost immediately.
I agreed it was stupid and I wouldn't do the things she's doing with my own kid in a million years.
This is Hannah's responsibility.
By allowing TB unsupervised and very intimate time with those two children Hannah is taking massive safeguarding
risks and putting a lot of unearned trust into a man she's been dating for twenty minutes and has no previous experience/knowledge of. And she is emotionally neglecting those boys by insisting they go along with her magical new single life at the pace she dictates, regardless of their own feelings about moving out of the family home, being co parented, illness and mobility problems, having random people care giving while Mum prioritises other things.
She needs to get a grip on herself.
