Well he was there the morning after the break in fitting cctv (conveniently this was also a #ad for his old company) so they were together then
I’m going to lay my ‘break in’ suspicions in one place because I feel like I’m going mad while others are talking about it like it was actually a break in
- Gemma never went anywhere long distance unless it was with Sophie (who was nearby as she checked on the cat) or her mum (she always posted pics of where they went or said where she was going with her mum in advance and there was none that day). A long distance trip is a rare occurrence.
- Nobody else got broken into which suggests her house was targeted for being a you tuber. She barely leaves the house and certainly not at a scheduled time like those of us who work so how would the thieves know a good time to break in. She also didn’t ever go far suggesting she could be back any minute.
- We had already seen evidence of a man living there. Jamie had been liking her pics prior. Jamie just happened to turn up the next day to fix the damage which was simultaneously an #ad (as I mentioned above) for his company
- The cat was left in an upstairs bedroom. Without food and it’s litter tray and she was a ‘long distance’ away. A cat she’s never mentioned damages her house so why keep it shut away other than not to escape
- She didn’t go all private like I would certainly do in her shoes after a break in and continued to showcase the contents of her home (Mac books, expensive products etc) and even continued posting other ads the next day
- And my personal take is that with Sophie being in the police. She may have confided in her BFF about the lie and Sophie would have to distance herself from a fake crime and would hate Jamie for being involved in the whole thing.
Am I going mad here or is this really not a break in.. I think I watch too many crime documentaries