That is what makes me balk at giving her sympathy over things. She revels in it and it feels manipulative.I’ve never known someone who enjoys being the victim as much as she does.
You definitely win the Internet today!!Gabriella Lindley #19: juniper moon, business tycoon, make sure you don’t follow her account too soon!!
It makes you wonder how many people actually interact with her on her brand deals.It’s deceptive as fuck, for some reason this winds me up more than anything else. I mean, she must get brand deals based on number of followers. It’s really immoral and not cool at all.
Not sure if anyone can this answer this but I've always been interested to know - when brands ask influencers to do an ad for them, are they paid simply for doing the ad itself or would they get commission from people who buy stuff on the back of their ad? So when Gabby does weird ads for stuff she's never used and will obviously never use again, does that have any financial backlash for her? Will she just be paid regardless but could've potentially earnt more had she had better engagement?It makes you wonder how many people actually interact with her on her brand deals.
For example; Lucy's Readily one was really well done. Her audience is perfect for it and I straight away signed up knowing we're staycationing soon, the whole family can use the account, and all our favourite usual purchased magazines are there. I doubt many of Grubby's minion's are falling over themselves to buy unknown skincare products that she clearly never uses. Bots certainly aren't either.
At this point it really looks like she takes whatever ad she can get.
Not sure if anyone can this answer this but I've always been interested to know - when brands ask influencers to do an ad for them, are they paid simply for doing the ad itself or would they get commission from people who buy stuff on the back of their ad? So when Gabby does weird ads for stuff she's never used and will obviously never use again, does that have any financial backlash for her? Will she just be paid regardless but could've potentially earnt more had she had better engagement?
It doesn't really matter, I've just always wondered what the incentive is for influencers doing loads of ads for stuff they obviously wouldn't actually use. I know they get paid for the ad and the instagram post or whatever but is that where their obligation ends or is there the potential to make more money from it and Gabby just gets her hands on whatever ad money she can even if she knows the brand won't get any sales from her audience?
Thank you! Yeah I was just wondering really if she does these one off ads fully knowing they're not going to work with her again because nobody is going to buy some of this weird stuff, she doesn't seem to do any longer term brand collaborations anymoreI know a smaller influencer with 26k followers whose engagement is really good, like 40%, so with that she's able to get herself more money on contracts because it's almost guaranteed a sizable amount of followers will go on to buy based on her recommendations.
A lot of times brands will be so pleased with her campaign they'll pay more money for another campaign or she'll use the engagement figures to bag herself another job with another brand.
I'm sure Gabby has the following to get through the door and talking to these brands for a decent contract but whether that translates into follow on deals is another story.
And those who do use her repeatedly, I'm sure her following count is enough for them to throw money her way because it just means visibility to them.
ETA quoted you without really answering. It's a "money grab" for anyone tbh. Obviously some are more honest and use brands they or their followers will appreciate. And because they're honest, like I said, they can use the success of the ad to get themselves more higher and better paid campaigns. So it does work in their favour that way.
I think Gabby just sees it as an easy £15k or whatever she might charge. If a brand never uses her again, she's probably not too bothered and will just try bag another.
On the hinch thread it has been said that if say there is an ebay link and you swipe up it remembers it for a certain time period (like 30 days) and even if you go through ebay via a different route then everything you buy on eBay within that time since swiping up is recorded and they get commission on it. It was mentioned a few times but I don't know for sure if it is trueNot sure if anyone can this answer this but I've always been interested to know - when brands ask influencers to do an ad for them, are they paid simply for doing the ad itself or would they get commission from people who buy stuff on the back of their ad? So when Gabby does weird ads for stuff she's never used and will obviously never use again, does that have any financial backlash for her? Will she just be paid regardless but could've potentially earnt more had she had better engagement?
It doesn't really matter, I've just always wondered what the incentive is for influencers doing loads of ads for stuff they obviously wouldn't actually use. I know they get paid for the ad and the instagram post or whatever but is that where their obligation ends or is there the potential to make more money from it and Gabby just gets her hands on whatever ad money she can even if she knows the brand won't get any sales from her audience?
Looks like Gabby might've done the same though - didn't we see what looked like a 'come as you are' print?I know this is off topic but Lucy could be treading in murky water if she has seriously just whacked Beatles lyrics (from Here Comes The Sun) on a mug
For once I bet Gabby is actually laughing.
I seriously hope Lucy has sought advice before making this item
View attachment 243250
I think Lucy's hoping just to make it her own style and hope nobody notices. If they do, claim "but i'm from Liverpool!"Looks like Gabby might've done the same though - didn't we see what looked like a 'come as you are' print?
What is it with both of these two just copying other people's stuff? Music, Lucy with the Harry Potter stuff - can they really not come up with anything by themselves?
I'm not buying anything from her, I think she's a hypocrite as I think I've said previously at length. No wonder she didn't say much about Gabby copying her when all she seems to do is copy other people's work and sell it on!I think Lucy's hoping just to make it her own style and hope nobody notices. If they do, claim "but i'm from Liverpool!"
It's just easy cash from loyal followers, sadly. I was excited by the prospect of other items as I had already purchased the grocery bag from Lucy. I'm a massive fan of The Beatles but will not be purchasing that.
I don't get why people expand to x amount of items when it's clear they should stop at far less. Better to make 5 outstanding items than 25 sub-par unoriginal ones + 2 really good ones.
I like Lucy, but that is twice now shes ripped off others in a short amount if time. That is a blatant use of lyrics, its not even hidden.I have no idea how the law on this works, so someone please pipe up if you do
I know this is off topic but Lucy could be treading in murky water if she has seriously just whacked Beatles lyrics (from Here Comes The Sun) on a mug
For once I bet Gabby is actually laughing.
I seriously hope Lucy has sought advice before making this item
View attachment 243250
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?