I think this could happen, maybe for 1 season
Attachments
-
67.1 KB
I read a rumour last week that he has already resigned, they’re just waiting for it to be launched officially. Apart from Sainz red bull don’t have many options other then Checco, in terms of someone who will happily play second driver and cope with that pressure, they won’t promote from RB eitherCheco thinks he’ll know about his RB contract for 2024 in the the next month so if he re-signs I’m not sure Daniel will make it to the summer break. It’s the reverse of last year when Daniel was applying all the pressure, now it’s Checo with all the cards. Horner said it’s his seat to lose so as long as he has equal weekends to this one coming up they surely will re-sign him?
Who would want to happily play 2nd fiddle to Max? It's like turn each week and know defeat stares at you. Maybe some would just for the money and seat.I read a rumour last week that he has already resigned, they’re just waiting for it to be launched officially. Apart from Sainz red bull don’t have many options other then Checco, in terms of someone who will happily play second driver and cope with that pressure, they won’t promote from RB either
I think most available cockpits aren't really that attractive. Either its the politics (RedBull) or the cars are shite. Lewis secured himself the only promising cockpit early, I'd say. At the same time there are a few drivers hogging spots that could go to interesting new faces or give fast drivers in lower tier teams a chance to level up.I read a rumour last week that he has already resigned, they’re just waiting for it to be launched officially. Apart from Sainz red bull don’t have many options other then Checco, in terms of someone who will happily play second driver and cope with that pressure, they won’t promote from RB either
Given that red bull were also speaking to him, I’d say he might have entertained it but I bet they were bottom of the pile or he didn’t even bother with it!So Fernando has resigned with AN. I wonder if he spoke seriously with Toto at all
That's the thing. I can see why they'd delete it logically, but the rulebook is clear that it should be deleted and plenty of other drivers have suffered on the receiving end of it.I mean, it's the right decision as Norris being in the gravel wasn't going to give him an advantage over the next lap, but it's wrong to not be consistent on this.
The rule book was applied correctly, in the event notes for this race weekend it clearly states:That's the thing. I can see why they'd delete it logically, but the rulebook is clear that it should be deleted and plenty of other drivers have suffered on the receiving end of it.
But suddenly when it's a Lewis sprint pole, it's no longer what's in the rulebook that matters
Wonder why it changes race after race then. FIA needs to sort it out because people are rightly looking critically at this.The rule book was applied correctly, in the event notes for this race weekend it clearly states:
View attachment 2884774
Norris crossed the line on the lap previous to his pole lap and triggered the sensors, on his pole lap he didn’t exceed track limits and the time was rightfully reinstated.
I also thought the next lap gets deleted as well.The rule book was applied correctly, in the event notes for this race weekend it clearly states:
View attachment 2884774
Norris crossed the line on the lap previous to his pole lap and triggered the sensors, on his pole lap he didn’t exceed track limits and the time was rightfully reinstated.
Nature of the track layout, like tracks with tarmac exits on the final corner, the drivers can carry more speed to start their next lap to cheat so both get invalidated.Wonder why it changes race after race then. FIA needs to sort it out because people are rightly looking critically at this.
They definitely don't allow common sense usually. Brazil 21 had it specifically stated in the decision doc that Lewis' out rear wing didn't confer any advantage, but he was still put to the back of the grid.If it was tarmac on the last corner then Lando would have floored it and gained an advantage starting his pole lap. As it was gravel it slowed him down so starting his pole lap he was slower than if he had been on the track as he lost momentum.
It’s track/conditions specific, not Lewis specific.
I’m not sure if the rules allow for that level of common sense, normally they don’t, it’s just black and white applied.