Ok I'm seeing far to many things about the Emirate of Dubai looking at buying united. The price tag looks to be over 3billion.
Last edited:
it said wives and girlfriends so don’t see why he would invite his cousin?surprised Sasha isnt in a pic, under pic in the comments ' Where is Walkers Tr ans girlfriend? Everyone knows the England footballer involved in that story was him.'
it said wives and girlfriends so don’t see why he would invite his cousin?
We already know the answer to that. No matter the heinous activities other club owners engage in, people will only bleat and cry about City’s “oIL mOnEyYyYyyyy.”
so im wondering if those people who in the media or online who condem citys owners will be condeming the potential dubai takeover of united or this which is a liverpool sponsor or the fact that liverpool owner john henry was friends with jeffery epstien or that axa another liverpool sponser axa is commiting genocide or is it just newcastle and citys owners that get hammered?
Most Utd fans want Sir Jim to buy the club & arnt happy with the latest storiesAs a neutral, I don’t like City’s owners or Newcastles…or PSGs won’t like the Man United ones either. I’ve expressed my thoughts on all this when the Newcastle takeover was happening so I won’t go into too much as I can’t be arsed. Would I want them to own Wolves? duck no.
I’ll just say it’s nothing do to with the clubs, the human rights violations are grim…all billionaires are corrupt to some extent but they’re next level…
I can admit City play excellent football (and I think a lot of their success comes from Pep… would they have got him without the investment, probably not…but he’ll be a big draw for a lot of players which helps…).
I know Newcastle and Man United hate their owners/prev owners so I can kind of understand the fans wanting it. Even if I wouldn’t want them within ten miles of Molineux lmao.
I didn’t know about Liverpool’s owner and Episten but given Abramovich being pally with Putin I’m not surprised… These scumbags seem to group together.
The only way you’d stop it would be the 50+1 rule and it’s too far gone at this point.
(I’m not about to cry about oil money not giving other teams a chance… Man United and Man City and the rest of the Sky Six are competing for different things to my club. Take Liverpool for example, although not “oil money” If they finished the season with just an FA Cup they’d be sad. I’d be on the Wembley pitch stealing a corner flag)
Ohh fairs, I don’t know much about him but he’s probably more ideal than the dodgy human rights consortiumMost Utd fans want Sir Jim to buy the club & arnt happy with the latest stories
yeah if thats our only option i'm #glazersinOhh fairs, I don’t know much about him but he’s probably more ideal than the dodgy human rights consortium
Well that's true, but lots of gay men don't give a Flying Wallenda about football so friendships, relationships or hookups can stay within friendship groups. Most gay men aren't interested in outing other gay men and never have been. I think in part it's a legacy left by the men who came before us when you could get sent to prison just for being you.You do see one or two stories about. There are often rumours in local gay communities, because gay men are not known for being discreet within the community itself (I suspect, but don't know, that the logic is that its not outing someone if you're only telling other gay people, or something to that effect). I'm not acquainted enough with any local gay communities to really find out though
"Chesterfield have said they are aware of an allegation relating to one of their players, who has not been named"This is absolutely shocking.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/62796999
I wouldn't really like to speculate, but I suspect we will found out in the truth in the next couple of weeks."Chesterfield have said they are aware of an allegation relating to one of their players, who has not been named"
Does this mean there was another player involved?!?
Most new owners are awful. I dislike Radrizzani immensely but when people ask me if I’d like a takeover at Leeds right now, I usually straight up say no. Radz is a moron and he’s got no money, but his human rights record isn’t too chequered at the moment (failed Myanmar tour notwithstanding)As a neutral, I don’t like City’s owners or Newcastles…or PSGs won’t like the Man United ones either. I’ve expressed my thoughts on all this when the Newcastle takeover was happening so I won’t go into too much as I can’t be arsed. Would I want them to own Wolves? duck no.
I’ll just say it’s nothing do to with the clubs, the human rights violations are grim…all billionaires are corrupt to some extent but they’re next level…
No, they just pay people to keep quiet.TBH I'm a bit of a lurker I don't contribute much I just love reading the comments!
But in the earlier threads there was loads of tea but this season there's not been much, do we assume the players are hiring better PR or at least the clubs are taking over players PR and keeping stuff out of the media? I can't believe all these players are suddenly behaving themselves!
a bit late to this chat but my friend did go to a Tottenham Christmas party years ago, she’s beautiful and has loads of followers and had to sign an NDA and phone cameras were all covered. Not because the girls are escorts just so no one sees players black out drunk stumbling about etcI think it works like - say if a group of escorts are hired to erm, entertain, let’s say the Tottenham team at a pre-season party, they would have to sign to say they won’t speak to the press or post anything on socials or disclose what happened to people not present.
I just want plenty of close ups of McTominay