Same here. I loved her art and it has, from the beginning, centred around a very specific colour palette and anyone who knows anything about art, can set apart the two books very, very quickly. I bought FG's book PURELY for the art (I've never read it because I am n my 40s and most of it is irrelevant so I am saving it for when my daughter is a bit older). I had heard of CE from her hairy fanny documentary but I had never followed her to begin with so knew nothing about her books prior to this "war".
When it first kicked off, I though maybe the content of FGs book was almost identical to CEs but there seems to be a lot of emphasis on the look of the book and I cannot see any similarities at all between the two. Some have commented on the size of the pages which is fucking laughable.
There also seems to be a lot of anger about CEs likeness being one of FGs illustrations, but it's obvious from the start that FG was in awe of CE, she is mentioned on the very first page and therefore I saw the illustration as a tribute to her rather than trying to rip her off.
Is this seriously what she writes about? How about earn your own riches and date whoever you like? Where is the happiness in being with someone who PAYS for your time? Is this not the same as being given "house-keeping" from the 1950s? I am really hoping I have misinterpreted this because if this is her radical and groundbreaking message then she's an absolute joke.