I know this will have been discussed previously but although I have skimmed older threads i cant find it, I have googled but have I got this right. When les died he left everything including the house to trace, his 3 children got £500k between them, trace wouldn't pay for funeral, it ended up in court to decide who was responsible, somehow I can't understand how or why but the court decided his kids should pay even though she got all of the money so they did & buried him with their mother, which is why trace & Charlotte had that statue made and go there, never to his actual grave, is that right? Also how was she doing benefit fraud by claiming widows benefit when she was/is a widow?