The revolve is a gimmick, plain and simple. The show would work fine without it and all that would happen is the first few rows didn't spin super super slowly
I was originally talking about the onstage revolve and it’s use during Bad Cinderella (which seems to be rarely from the video) rather than the stage and seats one. Theatre board is mixed on the main revolves use- some say it’s just a gimmick, others say it really elevates the second half- sounds to me that it’s a gimmick that works. I’ve heard people say that you don’t have to be in the seats that move to get the magical experience. The people sat it the moving seats will have one experience and those that watch the seats move will have another. Tbh, that gimmick actually really makes me want to see it (the tech side of things really fascinated me).
I find that some pieces of theatre are reviewed as if everything is comparable to Shakespeare. Cinderella is not Macbeth. It’s sounds a bit like a cheesey lifetime Christmas movie- you pretty much know where it’s going to go, you’ve got some fun tunes to listen and have a laugh. If people enjoy it, that’s okay and the same for people who don’t like it. For me it’s the way Carrie uses her social media and generally talks down to people now. Having watched a couple of her older videos recently, I’ve realised that personality has always been there. She’s always been condescending it’s just a lot more obvious now.
There are times when I feel sorry for Carrie and kind of feel bad for being on here, talking about her. But then I realise that I could be one of those people who start arguments in her YouTube comments or tagging her in conversations on twitter trying to get a rise out of her. I’m not the kind of person to do that. I went to her thread on GG because I’d just started watching her and Carrie made a video talking about herself reading the site. Curiosity got the best of me, I went down that rabbit hole and I realised that everything that was being talked about was stuff that had niggled at me whilst watching her videos. It was nice to know I wasn’t the only one that was seeing it. I was originally on GG for the Colleen Ballinger thread and everything that happened after the divorce (that’s like diving into a black hole if you are interested in the gossip there).
If anything I find these kind of sites to be a bit of a modern day heat magazine but it’s gossip from the point of view from the people who consume it. I don’t really read magazines anymore- I hated the way magazines ripped celebs apart for the way they looked. I remember one magazine (I think it was Heat) that started a section on the way celebs knees looked and that was the last straw for me. At least over here, the audience and consumers control the narrative that than us being told what to believe. Some threads are nicer than others but overall we can have a discussion and agree to disagree on some things. What do we have in common? We can see through the bullshit! Even on the gender discussion, so many points of view but there is always something that everyone agrees with.
Some people see these sites and think we have no lives. I have a job, hobbies, friends… I’m not on here every single second of everyday. I’m usually on here in the evenings when I’m not quite ready for bed. When most normal people are watching the news, I go to tattle. Some people might think that’s unhealthy, but to me the news is unhealthy to watch everyday- it’s how I ended up having a mental breakdown in quarantine. (I think this has deviated because I’ve been catching up on the Alice Evans and Ioan Gruffudd thread and Alice has had some choice words about tattlers).
Any way, I’m here to judge Carrie for her social media presence and we all have a right to have that conversation.