Ooh, she's doing 'essays' now. Entitled moaning incoming. She says the heads of clothing company are fatphobic, biased against 'fat people' and people taking ozempic and having weight loss surgery are somehow reducing the range of plus size clothing available.
What she fails to realise is that she isn't just plus size, she's on the extreme end of plus size. It is simply fact to say that she, at a size 28/30, represents a tiny fraction of what is the actual plus size market. The average woman wears a size 16. She's completely ignoring that compared to 10 years ago, when almost every brand would stop at a size 16, almost all brands at least go up to a 20 - and most supermarkets go up to a 24.
She keeps going on about 'unpleasant truths' but here it is - anyone, of any size, who is in the extreme minority is not going to be catered to in the same way as the average size. If you wear a size 2 shoe, or a size 0 dress, you are going to find your options just as limited. It isn't fat phobic, it's business. Catering for sizes on the extreme fringes is unprofitable. It costs money to produce every size, and profits are how companies choose what to invest in. If those sizes do not sell, they do not make profit. That's life. And you are only making it worse by returning haul after haul, reducing those profits even more.
Now let's go back to the elephant in the room (not you, Becky) - try some ethical, UK-based plus size clothing brands. Ones that can't afford to send you free items but embody these values you claim to have. Or is it only bad when companies put profits first, and fine when you do it?
she just constantly blows smoke up her wide load. It's not healthy how involved she is
