She will definitely get an au pair and frame it that she wants to give the kids an opportunity to learn about other languages!I hope she pays them competitively and is fully supportive of any flexible working request that they put in to care for their own children
---
Or do you think sheâll go cheap, live in au pair ?
Ashley James #43 Loathsome and offensive on a daily basis
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Ashley James Threads Wiki
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
She definitely wouldnât exploit a young foreign girl and pay them ÂŁ100 a week. Wonder how sheâd feel about them wandering around with their boobs popping out. Fine Iâm sure, as thereâs nothing sexual about that
Wondering how theyâll have the space for a live in nanny/au pair, if their current house (allegedly) isnât big enough for the four of them. They canât possibly be upsizing.
Do we think sheâs trying to get a Disney mention in there because of Gus Gus? She just has the wrong filmHad time to stop and take a photo of it though
Snow White with a single ladybird
View attachment 2816465
I mean she could easily make it as a wicked step mother one day when Tommy bins her offDo we think sheâs trying to get a Disney mention in there because of Gus Gus? She just has the wrong film
As a nanny I canât WAIT to see how that goes.
NO ONE TOLD HER you are responsible as an employer for paying holidays and NI
NO ONE TOLD HER you are responsible as an employer for paying holidays and NI
I donât they would be able to afford a daily Nanny in London. And I donât think it would suit her lifestyle to have a live in nanny or au pair. She wants those kids out of the house so she can âworkâ. I think it will be a nursery or childminder again.
Sheâll be in London where the street are paved with gold, or at least free child activities. Either sheâll be out of the house doing all the work she thinks sheâll have or sheâll pack the kids off to various museums and exhibitions⊠then wonder why Alf is really over stimulated and confused by the new house, new childcare and constant stream of activities. Ada the old soul will be used to it, having done it all before, and any undesirable behaviour will be a result of her teething or just showing her dominance as as strong woman.
Theyâll be like ships in the night and sheâll complain about the juggle of it all and how Dadâs donât have to worry about it.
Theyâll be like ships in the night and sheâll complain about the juggle of it all and how Dadâs donât have to worry about it.
Please apply just to meet her. Please.As a nanny I canât WAIT to see how that goes.
NO ONE TOLD HER you are responsible as an employer for paying holidays and NI
And maternity pay above the statutory which surely any mum supporting mum would do?! Sheâll be voting Tory in no time once she has to put her hand in her pocketâŠAs a nanny I canât WAIT to see how that goes.
NO ONE TOLD HER you are responsible as an employer for paying holidays and NI
They're both definitely the type to have an aupair, pay them rock bottom and expect 7-7 hours. (I was one many moons ago, and the parents even went on holiday for a week and left me with the kids. For no extra pay).
The others are Ashley James.
Thinking of all of Ashleyâs âJewish friendsâ with her latest reel đ« đ« đ«
Last edited:
researchI think itâs from âpregnant then screwedâ most recent research but she really ought to be saying thatâs where it from didnât she x
Pregnant then screwed quote the report but itâs actually from The Equalities and Human Rights Commission investigation into pregnancy discrimination in 2015. âTheir final report found that 54,000 women a year are forced out of their job because of pregnancy discriminationâ. â11% said they had been dismissed, made compulsorily redundant, or treated so poorly that they felt they had to leave their jobs.â
However the report was âA survey of more than 3,200 women ⊠Scaled up to the general population this could mean as many as 54,000 mothers lose their jobs every year.â
It resurfaced in 2022 and is misreported as being from then because it was widely referenced with the creation of the âProtection from Redundancy (Pregnancy and Family Leave) Act 2023â.
Iâm not suggesting itâs not valid at all, but she uses the same stat to say people are forced out due to childcare which isnât what itâs about.
This link gives some of the negative and positive findings of the report https://wenwales.org.uk/ehrc-study-...en-still-experience-maternity-discrimination/
The office of National statistics produced a report from the 2021 census on the labour market for families which delves into the impact of childcare that she could easily access and would support many of her views so itâs just laziness to keep rolling out the same stat that is outdated, a low sample size and not about childcare.
Families and the labour market, UK - Office for National Statistics
The employment rates and employment practices of men and women with dependent children in the UK, based on data from the Labour Force Survey, Annual Population Survey and Time Use Survey.
www.ons.gov.uk
The latest story⊠is that the best pic she could get of Alf?! âI just wanna hang out with them all the time?â - so do then!
Last edited:
This is exactly it! More articulate than I could have put it!!
Sure she said about him starting pre school because we were talking about a nanny x
- Status