Rather like ‘Whack-a-Mole’, no sooner had two conspiracy theories about Bill Gates’ microchips been knocked on the head (post #273) than up popped two more begging to be given the same treatment. It really is so easy that it would be rude not to.
The first concerns the process being developed by M.I.T of combining a dye with a vaccine which helped spawn the original microchip frenzy. The theory now goes that even if the process doesn’t use actual microchips, the ‘quantum dot’ system is still ominous. Citing an article published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, the online journal Ark Republic explains that quantum dots are “
a form of nanotechnology laden with encoded information like health data. And, get this, the file is a digital mark that is inserted just underneath a person’s skin for the use of tracing”. Of course if you actually
read the IEEE article (linked below) it is perfectly clear that it is nothing of the kind. ‘Quantum dots’ are ‘nano’ (i.e. tiny) particles that absorb and emit light. Their use with vaccines will involve creating a pattern of dots under the skin, invisible to the naked eye, which signify what vaccination was given and when. Their primary use will be in countries where maintaining central records of vaccination is very difficult. They are not
laden with information, not encoded, there is no 'file' and the technology is not 'digital'.
https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-human...g/quantum-dots-encode-vaccine-history-in-skin
The second conspiracy theory concerns a Microsoft patent application titled “
Cryptocurrency system using body activity data”. Here at last is incontrovertible proof of Bill Gates determination on any flimsy pretext to get microchips into people. Just to hammer home the point some CT-ers have excitedly pointed out, the application serial number contains the letters ‘WO’ which clearly stands for ‘World Order’ and, providing you ignore 8 of the 11 digits, the number 666 - the mark of the beast!
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2020060606A1/en
Now I can’t talk about the science involved because I know as much about cryptocurrency as CT-ers do about … well, almost anything really but there is one rather obvious flaw in their argument. Just as the alleged Moderna patent for Covid-19 nine months before it was discovered didn’t actually mention the virus, the Microsoft application for the crypto-mining microchips to be inserted into the human body does not mention the terms ’chip’, ‘microchip’, ‘implant’ or ‘insert’ on one, single occasion.
It took me less than a minute to find an explanation that the patent application is actually for a “
new potential option of bitcoin mining [which] involves tracking body activity via wearable technology, such as smart watches and other gadgets (I hope that makes sense to somebody).
It’s clear to me that CT-ers never actually read the source material that is supposed to support their theories. If they did they surely wouldn’t continue to embarrass themselves by spreading such guff.