9, in the last few minuteswhich podcast episode as this
9, in the last few minuteswhich podcast episode as this
See this annoys me bc she claims she’s so happy being single??? And how she doesn’t want a boyfriedn bc she doesn’t have the time??In Anas new tiktok she says “sorry but tinder isn’t cutting it anymore, TikTok help me find a boyfriend” Is she that desperate? also i love how some guy commented saying “Go to an orthodontist first and then you might find one”
I agree to a point but how was a load of five pound clothes essential to her? She isnt short of clothes. The things you ordered, clearly are essential. But I just domt see how a case can be made for that.Completely agree. Who decides what is and isnt essential? Last week off amazon I ordered a kindle, some black pens and white revision card. Not essential to you, but essential to me, working from home (NHS) and also my own sanity and mental health (the kindle). The last thing we all need is judging what is and isnt essential to someone
Its like shes trying to have two different personalities on different social medias, Youtube is all innocent and safe for the children and then TikTok is see through shirts, sexual jokes, her new tinder and questionable dances...See this annoys me bc she claims she’s so happy being single??? And how she doesn’t want a boyfriedn bc she doesn’t have the time??
Because no one needs to make a case for what they choose to order or not. As I said the business is still allowed to run so people can still buy from it?I agree to a
I agree to a point but how was a load of five pound clothes essential to her? She isnt short of clothes. The things you ordered, clearly are essential. But I just domt see how a case can be made for that.
I don't think anyone is saying that she broke the law, just that it's common sense that delivery drivers are struggling to cope at the moment. Ordering clothes that she's never going to wear and will probably send back could mean that vulnerable people get their essential items that they've ordered later than they'd hoped for.Because no one needs to make a case for what they choose to order or not. As I said the business is still allowed to run so people can still buy from it?
she’s not gone round a clothes shop, she’s ordered online. Not a fan of ana but if it was essentials only the government would have told these clothes stores to shut.
it’s the people going to parks, seasides, parties meeting friends for ‘exercise’ etc that should be getting back lash.
Exactly. Nail on the head. Shes not breaking any rules but we can all be helping support postal services and delivery drivers by only ordering essentials. She has a responsibility to set an example for her young fans because that's the position shes put herself in.I don't think anyone is saying that she broke the law, just that it's common sense that delivery drivers are struggling to cope at the moment. Ordering clothes that she's never going to wear and will probably send back could mean that vulnerable people get their essential items that they've ordered later than they'd hoped for.
The very least people should be doing is following the social distancing rules laid out by the government. But there's more that we can be doing to help people too and not ordering things we don't need is one of them. Same with not going for drives in case we crash and need medical help that should be focused on others at this time.
I agree. Shes following the rules (now) which is great but she could do more. She could do more with literally no effort at all. Just because other people are doing worse doesnt mean we cannot point out ana doing something she shouldn't. This isnt emily or syd's threads which is why theyve not been mentioned.She is allowed to order clothes. (But I don’t think cheap rubbish she’s not going to wear classifies as essential...) Yes she definitely shouldn’t be showing us that she is still ordering stuff as it sets a poor example for her young viewers and puts a further strain on the postal system. However I think those who are still meeting people unnecessarily should be the people facing backlash.
i.e. Emily Canham who travelled to Cornwall mid-lockdown. Syd from syd and ell who is preaching about staying at home yet she stayed in a hotel with her boyfriend only a week ago and is still visiting her boyfriend and his family *who she does NOT live with*!!! At least ana is following the basic lockdown rules!
At least she donated the revenue from Saturday, a surprising amount didn't! And I could be doing more, you could be doing more, we all could, but where do you draw the line?I agree. Shes following the rules (now) which is great but she could do more. She could do more with literally no effort at all. Just because other people are doing worse doesnt mean we cannot point out ana doing something she shouldn't. This isnt emily or syd's threads which is why theyve not been mentioned.
Theres a rave section you might enjoy that more. I'm done with this now. Her buying 5 pound fast fashion she wont wear past the next couple of weeks to prove a point is not a good use of the postal service during a pandemic, I wont be convinced otherwise, this is boring.At least she donated the revenue from Saturday, a surprising amount didn't! And I could be doing more, you could be doing more, we all could, but where do you draw the line?
Yes!! And the people in the factories/packers aren’t essential/key workers but they’re being forced to work while people are still ordering unnecessary clothingI don't think anyone is saying that she broke the law, just that it's common sense that delivery drivers are struggling to cope at the moment. Ordering clothes that she's never going to wear and will probably send back could mean that vulnerable people get their essential items that they've ordered later than they'd hoped for.
The very least people should be doing is following the social distancing rules laid out by the government. But there's more that we can be doing to help people too and not ordering things we don't need is one of them. Same with not going for drives in case we crash and need medical help that should be focused on others at this time.
No one is trying to convince you. We are airing our views as are you.Theres a rave section you might enjoy that more. I'm done with this now. Her buying 5 pound fast fashion she wont wear past the next couple of weeks to prove a point is not a good use of the postal service during a pandemic, I wont be convinced otherwise, this is boring.
I mean she really had no choice about donating the revenue, it was Saffron's idea and she's her 'best friend', she would have been absolutely slated if she didn't take part and she knows that.At least she donated the revenue from Saturday, a surprising amount didn't! And I could be doing more, you could be doing more, we all could, but where do you draw the line?
100% agree.I don't think anyone is saying that she broke the law, just that it's common sense that delivery drivers are struggling to cope at the moment. Ordering clothes that she's never going to wear and will probably send back could mean that vulnerable people get their essential items that they've ordered later than they'd hoped for.
The very least people should be doing is following the social distancing rules laid out by the government. But there's more that we can be doing to help people too and not ordering things we don't need is one of them. Same with not going for drives in case we crash and need medical help that should be focused on others at this time.
She really did Saff dirty there
What was said as it’s not there anymore?She really did Saff dirty there