Are pimples on penises now considered off limits??![Censored :censored: :censored:]()
Well for me personally, yes they'd be off limits!Are pimples on penises now considered off limits??![]()
No he didn't, he's always been full of absolute titI used to like him. Most of the time he made clear arguments and questioned what was going on with the establishment and Harry and Meghan.
In my previous life, I seem to recall being aware of him at Leicester Sq in the pre Global radio days. Think he had a gig on Capital Gold at the time. This is before BBC LRVery strange cove. On the one hand he's a Colin Hunt-style old showbiz nerd, happy to do fawning chats with minor celebs from the Seventies to puff up their next panto. On the other hand, he tries to be another male Katie Hopkins.
As far as I know, he didn't go much beyond being a tea boy at BBC local radio, but the BBC-hating tabloids, in their desperation to drag the Corporation into every bad news story possible, invariably describe him as an 'ex-BBC DJ'. I'm surprised they didn't fill their papers in the 1940s with stories about 'BBC World Service listener invades Poland'.
No he didn't, he's always been full of absolute tit![]()
Heard he was a warm up before the show but wasn’t good that’s what I heard but don’t know if that’s trueHe worked on Loose Women in some capacity as well. Doing what I don’t know. He made it sound like he was the audience warm up man, but I find that hard to believe given he’s about as funny as an enema.
He only ever did a few cover shifts for when the guy before the current permanent one was off sick, which was been well over five years ago now (probably more like 8-10). It was Greg Scott back then, who Alex has been fighting with on Twitter for years now. His grudges always seem to involve people he's worked with in some capacity.Heard he was a warm up before the show but wasn’t good that’s what I heard but don’t know if that’s true
I don't understand why anyone would want to pay to hear his opinions.I like how these court cases often reveal the truth behind the lies... before he was in court he was claiming that he had upwards of 20,000 people paying £4 a month to get access to the private videos on his website. It turns out that was obviously complete bollocks.
How comes he gets found guilty of stalking the four men but not the four women? Seems a bit 'off'.
If you’ve seen the audience at any of his shows you’ll see he certainly appeals to a certain ‘demographic’. Mostly late middle aged, bald, overweight white men. The kind of people you’d see at a Roy Chubby Brown or Jim Davidson gig.I think he tempts the hard of thinking to sign up by hinting at being able to say exactly what he wants and not having to comply with YouTube's policies, so I assume it's more extreme racism and homophobia than he usually spouts.
He comes across as a failed entertainer. In my opinion, he probably wanted to be in music or more successful in radio, but he wasn't, so he's bitter towards those that have succeeded and become a face in the entertainment industry.Must be something more going on with the guy because your average youtube alt-whatever grifter generally know where to call the line between stoking tension for views and actually doing crimes.
Clearly some sort of narcissistic personality thing happening but like turned up to 11.
Hopefully the guy calms down a bit after serving his punishments.