Armpit hair looks gross and needs to be shaved of immediately and if you dye it or anything like that then u r just strange
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Men and women? The thought of it all sweaty is a bit grim
Both and I agree so unhygienicMen and women? The thought of it all sweaty is a bit grim
I just spat out my tea laughing! Also I am very behind the times because I didn’t realise she is 19 nowI feel the same over her. She looks like an angry chimpanzee that's about to go lulu and start chucking people out of windows, etc
and all my talk of her parents needing to send her to school. Jesus. She is a total and utter dose though.Leggings are not trousers, in the last couple of years I’ve seen it creep into British fashion bloggers and influencers content, leggings, trainers and short top. stoppit, it looks awful regardless of how slim and toned the wearer might be.
Cheap fillers and those scary lash extensions scream I got them done down the local beauty salon next to the nail place where they take cash only.
Cheap fillers and those scary lash extensions scream I got them done down the local beauty salon next to the nail place where they take cash only.
Men can't win this one.Men and women? The thought of it all sweaty is a bit grim
Hairy? Still wiry hair in pits.
Removed? No shouldn't be smooth and hair free on a bloke
That's from a psychology point of view
I could show you true life cases that tell a different story ,there's no label or justification for these sick fucks they are what they are ,in most cases it's not even the child that attracts them it's the idea of innocence and manipulation that the word child signifies ,a power trip for them ...( not getting at your post btw just my own thoughts on it )BTW don't you just love how Tattle rolls this discussion was borne from David Bowies teeth
Last edited:
17? Two 16 year olds being intimate, is that wrong? You can be legally married. What does the age difference need to be before it is wrong 16/18, 16/20, 16/45? As someone else has said, it’s an arbitrary figure. I’m sure there have been studies to show what age we are mature enough to consent rather than be coerced, but there are so many variables beyond age by why is that the measure?
The main woman involved with Andrew’s case was 17 so would be of legal age in the UK but not in the US - how does that work out?
Pdos aside, I believe there’s another additional group of men pursuing 15 & 16 year olds not because they are sexually attracted to them specifically but because they can be vulnerable, easy targets.
I know older women who can be coerced
and younger girls who are far more savvy, both have been through puberty. When does it become ‘old enough to know better’ victim blaming & for which there’s no law, rather than ‘sexual predator taking advantage’? It feels to me that there should be additional protection from predators not just an age.
I don’t think Adele would be as successful if Amy Winehouse was alive.
I didn't like Amy Winehouse. She sang like a duck quacking.
I liked Valerie, which was a cover version. I didn't like any of her others.
Indian woman here. I love love love when people from other ethnicity wear Indian clothes and bindis, I mean they look stunningly beautiful. I mean look at Gwen Stefani! There is no wrong in wearing jewellery or saree or bindi.. But I am all against gods and goddesses used as Halloween costumes (Heidi Klum did you hear me)
Last edited:
Oh my! I didn’t realise it was used in that context! I thought it was an alternative to p e d o! My apologises.
Thank you yes perfectly put. . lines are being blurred. They are trying to normalise P e d o and make it acceptable https://www.thecollegefix.com/cambridge-conference-pedophilia-is-natural-and-normal/
Minor-attracted persons is part of the plan in rebranding
just google Minor-attracted persons and see how the branding is being accepted
This is all part of a deeper agenda and if you want to go down that particular rabbit hole look into "Transgenda agenda"
Jeez, it’s disgusting that they wish to rebrand it!
A lot of the transgender movement is aimed at children. At that age children aren’t even straight, let alone trans and have no sexual appetite at all! Why do people take their kids to those pride events so they can witness half naked leather bound men, leather bound dog people on leads, human horses with tail butt plugs in and other such bizarre fetishes? As I’ve stressed before the pride events seem to have been hijacked by weird fetish and trans rather than your average gays/lesbians anyway and the movement is on its way into incorporating pedophilia as a sexual orientation… that’s what the + subliminally stands for. People who take their children to such events really need looking at tbh. It’s abuse.
To say things were different then does sound like a cop out but they were to a certain extent.
People left school at 14 or 15 and could go straight into a job. An awful lot of people married by 18-20 and had kids a lot younger. People grew up an awful lot quicker then. The mindset was very different which is probably why it wasn't frowned upon like it is now. Even getting married at 25 now seems young to a lot of people.
Even though 16 is lawful in the UK, it seems incredibly young.
The only ones that would normalise it are those that do it .I couldn't see many people being accepting of it although there are cultures where child brides are the norm
17 yr olds can legally do a lot of things from driving to marriage but I know plenty that haven't the sense they were born with
Last edited:
I have to say the whole MAP thing makes me very uncomfortable for obvious reasons, but also because it feels like it's trying to be tacked onto LGB people.
We've already seen an increase in homophobic hate crime and that's only likely to carry on. It's depressing.
We've already seen an increase in homophobic hate crime and that's only likely to carry on. It's depressing.
- Status