I don't mean this in a way to chastise people who are genuinely exploring their gender and sexuality, but it really feels like it has become trendy for influencers and public figures to come out as "queer" but continue to exclusively be in heterosexual relationships or even hint to their fanbase that they're exploring their gender identity and that exploration turns out to be a AFAB person wearing cargo pants and tshirt. I also think that someone's gender and sexuality journey isn't something that neccesarily needs to be shared publically online. There's nothing wrong with it, but it opens up a conversation that influencers tend to get defensive about. For example, Harry Styles hinting at his queerness and openly fueling speculation about his gender and sexuality by publically speaking about exploring his gender and sexuality, and then getting upset when people point out that he's a cishet man deliberately profiting off of making his audience think that he may be queer. Someone's gender and sexuality is their personal business that they can choose not to share, but publically opening up that conversation is making it public business. The way he dresses for performances isn't what makes people speculate about his gender and sexuality. It's the fact that he makes it a point to tell interviewers unprompted that just because he presents as a cishet man doesn't mean that he is cishet. Coming out as ambiguous in regards to gender and sexuality unprompted serves no purpose unless you are hoping to gain something from your audience.
Personally, given the history of queer repression, I don't think queerbaiting when it comes from people like Harry Styles or Jade is a bad thing.
Like, who they actually
duck and how they actually think about their gender (which is really the piece of missing information up for debate in queerbating conversations) is basically, pretty much, irrelevant. The fact is that they can openly question and explore and say "actually I'm not sure I am normative". That's something we should celebrate, given men like Alan Turing and Oscar Wilde were treated as criminals for homosexuality, and women like Janis Ian were blacklisted in industries (
duck Bill Cosby) for the merest hint of lesbianism (she didn't even know she was gay at the time).
It's not new. It's not new at all. David Bowie was very open about his bisexuality, as was Freddie Mercury. Harry Styles isn't a trailblazer for what he's doing, not like Boy George or Elton John, but then I'm not sure that people are really pretending he is.
I often fear conversations about queerbaiting veer into biphobia, just for comments like:
It really feels like it has become trendy for influencers and public figures to come out as "queer" but continue to exclusively be in heterosexual relationships or even hint to their fanbase that they're exploring their gender identity and that exploration turns out to be a AFAB person wearing cargo pants and tshirt.
Bisexuals end up dating more people of the opposite gender than they do the same gender because less people are homosexual than are afflicted by heterosexuality. Sure, we can have a conversation about how people who haven't been in homosexual relationships have not got certain experiences that those who have do, but to question identity beyond that is rude.
I suppose you can make a point of it being a way to deepen parasocial relationships with audiences: a (today) low stakes way to offer information about ones private life, but then should we not celebrate that it is now low stakes? Treat it with a "ok cool" and move on? It's no different, really, than Taylor Swift talking about her cats.
So no. There is no problem with Jade talking about being queer. If she says she's a queer girly, for all intents and purposes she's a queer girly. She has far worse things about her to criticise.