what happened to the investigation into Boris that was supposed to take place?Bearing in mind the ( unbelievable ) number of women the revolting specimen manages to juggle, keeping his options open seems par for the course.
I can’t believe he’s run out of thick Americans willing to pay to listen to his nonsense and I’m even more surprised he’s even considering standing at the next election - unless the Tories are going to parachute him into an unloseable seat, if such a thing will exist by then.
He can still do that whilst being a backbench MP though I suppose. I doubt he's ever been about serving his constants and holding surgeries. This way he gets to keep a foot in the door so he must think he stands a chance of getting the top job back again.Thing is, he could probably make more money writing shit books about Churchill and appearing on TV than he'd make as PM, so it's obviously not 100% about that.
The report was due on 26/11 but is delayed: https://committees.parliament.uk/work/6812/boris-johnson-matter-referred-on-21-april-2022/what happened to the investigation into Boris that was supposed to take place?
Right. We can't underestimate the hunger for power.Thing is, he could probably make more money writing shit books about Churchill and appearing on TV than he'd make as PM, so it's obviously not 100% about that.
He'll probably go for Nadine's seat when she goes to the Lords.Are any of those leaving in safe seats? Surely Boris will move to one of those rather than try his luck in Uxbridge which is looking precarious.
I am in favour of the principle of an appointed second chamber. There are\have been a number of experts who would not wish to be involved in party politics that became peers such as Brian Rix, Leonard Cheshire, Ron Deering, David Ramsbotham, etc. who have given their knowledge to other peers in debates to bring genuine and better changes to legislation. Unfortunately, all PMs have given peerages to party hacks, party donors, their mates, etc. which has made it totally unrepresentative.Am I alone in not being fully convinced we should get rid of the house of lords? I'm open to some reform - maybe it shouldn't be lifelong, maybe there should be limits to how many peerages each PM/political party can give, and maybe it should be offered to more people who do community based work.
I dunno, I've just seen HoL amend some laws for the better. Despite most of them seeming to be out of touch with the average person on appearances, the lack of political affiliation or motivation sometimes helps.
The thought of going for Nadine's 'seat' has put me right off my cornflakes.He'll probably go for Nadine's seat when she goes to the Lords.
Nadine would love it if he did in that sense, she's obviously very horny for him.The thought of going for Nadine's 'seat' has put me right off my cornflakes.
Stepping away, she is never there lolView attachment 1786276
Taking time out to clear her name
She lobbied on behalf of her husband’s newly set up company - WRONG
Won a huge contract - WRONG
Eventually 29 million found its way to her bank account via her husbands - WRONG
let’s sit back and watch her clear her name
Judging by some of the reports I’ve seen she’s “liquidating her assets” and preparing to get the hell out of here.View attachment 1786276
Taking time out to clear her name
She lobbied on behalf of her husband’s newly set up company - WRONG
Won a huge contract - WRONG
Eventually 29 million found its way to her bank account via her husbands - WRONG
let’s sit back and watch her clear her name
Wonder how much of the 170m found its way into Goves bank account?That sleazy little shit Gove is in this up to his eyeballs.
Gove is such a little weasel.Wonder how much of the 170m found its way into Goves bank account?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?