I hope coming soon means sooner because I can’t see the point if they delay it even furtherLooks like the release got delayed
Tom Hiddleston's 'Loki' TV Show Has Been Ditched In 2023
What is going on with Disney+?insidethemagic.net
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
For what I understood it was due to the new CEO and the newest strategy....we'll have to wait and see I guess
Ah ok. That makes sense, I just hope they don’t delay too long…the hype will die down soon.
I don't think it will. Thd hype has been on since S1. But I think if anything, it will still be in summer. I read theories that it may be *before* Secret Invasion to follow Ant-Man. But I guess we will see. I wish we had ať least the trailer.
He looks so good! More new pictures on Torilla
Apparently Loki and Secret Invasion will STILL be released this year though it doesn't seem that's going to be June /July as we initially were told.
---
The general consensus on all the articles I've read seem to point to later this year.
With the CEO of Walt Disney coming back and the feedback gotten about lousy CGI and VFX workers being overworked (I mean Black Panther might have been a beast to post-prod) I can understand the delay.
What concerns me, yet is not so far fetched, is the fact that super hero movies seem to be dying down after nearly 2 decades of being one of the most grossing subgenres out there.
People might want to see something different from major studios and, even if that's a bummer for us, they are still companies that need to make a profit... it's all on the numbers, ultimately
I don't think the hype is dying down I think it's the delays fans are fed up. Ok CGI heavy will take an age to post-prod but the gaps are huge and most often not well communicated. The most obvious one was Black Panther 2 and they did communicate that very well and everyone understood (I think they did a fantastic job of it) but some of the others have been bounced around so many times I've lost count or it's become like playground whispers across different social media platforms to piece it all together. You also have a problem when stars can't or won't do lots of small interviews to help the hype. I think that's why other Disney series (Mandalorian and BOBF) have become so popular because their stars have spoken to the fancasts and vloggers etc so you have to wonder if Disney knows that works why do they not do it for Marvel?
I think Covid aside if they'd stuck to their original timeline there wouldn't be this problem now or if they'd decided that someone wasn't right for a part (and later panned for it, I can think of a few examples in both Marvel film and series) they should have had the guts to change the actor or change the script (yes I mean Love and Thunder not even Christian Bale could save that one).
As for Tom I've said this before and I'll say it again he'd be better letting his PR run his social media at least then there would be a presence.
Changing the subject slightly did anyone read about Sebastian Stan wanting to jump to a different sci fi series?
Tom and Zawe and little Hiddles and her parents taking a nice family walk in Paris.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Tom Hiddleston and Zawe Ashton look every inch the doting parents
The actor, 42, and the Fresh Meat star, 38, quietly welcomed their first child together in October after confirming their engagement earlier in the year.
I mean, it is lovely to see Tom and the babiy obviously adopts Tom´s style of dressing 
But I am not a fan of this privacy invasion and I cannot get over the fact that while I actually work for a living, some wannabe journalist gets paid for putting together an article with "He wears/she wears/they live in Atlanta/he dated Taylor Swift.
And then you go to comments where they say she is fat (because she just gave birth you a**holes) and that he can do better (because he obviously needs an advice from an immature fangirl at his age of 42....)
Duh, but, yes, nice family pictures but it is a bit too much, I think. At least they had the decency not to show the baby (but I am sure if it was not given by law, they would show the baby´s face immedaitely)
But I am not a fan of this privacy invasion and I cannot get over the fact that while I actually work for a living, some wannabe journalist gets paid for putting together an article with "He wears/she wears/they live in Atlanta/he dated Taylor Swift.And then you go to comments where they say she is fat (because she just gave birth you a**holes) and that he can do better (because he obviously needs an advice from an immature fangirl at his age of 42....)
Duh, but, yes, nice family pictures but it is a bit too much, I think. At least they had the decency not to show the baby (but I am sure if it was not given by law, they would show the baby´s face immedaitely)
I can't believe they'd put shoes likes that on such a young baby, it wrecks their feet! Age does not guarantee wisdom
Commenting on someone's weight is unacceptable, no matter if they just given birth or not. Trolls on the internet feel almighty because the shield themselves behind a screen name.I mean, it is lovely to see Tom and the babiy obviously adopts Tom´s style of dressing
And then you go to comments where they say she is fat (because she just gave birth you a**holes) and that he can do better (because he obviously needs an advice from an immature fangirl at his age of 42....)
Duh, but, yes, nice family pictures but it is a bit too much, I think. At least they had the decency not to show the baby (but I am sure if it was not given by law, they would show the baby´s face immedaitely)
I think not showing the baby's face is the least that they could've done. I love the photos, don't get me wrong, but I do believe it should've be the parent's decision whether they want to showcase, so publicly, their toddler to the world not someone that needs to make a buck. That line among tabloids is always trespassed and it's not ok for me.
Granted we all wanted to see them together but this photo op was not what I had in mind for the 'reveal' as, unless this was agreed upon (which doesn't seem like it) this shouldn't have happened and someone at the DM's press room should've vetoed unless consent was granted.
That being said, it's nice to see this side of Hiddles.
Chill out, they’re just soft little boots with canvas soles, not scaled down adult ones!
There will always just be people on the internet who are straight up assholes, and it comes out a lot when they’re feeling insecure about something, or feel like something they’re entitled to has been taken away. Tom doesn’t belong to them, his child is even more proof of his life that they aren’t apart of. How to handle that? Insult the woman, insult him- his looks, his career. I can’t imagine it actually feels that good though, it just makes them feel like they have control or power in the situation.
I do believe European laws say they have to blur children’s faces in the media. I wish US had the same laws.
I think French tabloid is sadly very intrusive. I suppose DM have contacts there. Thanksfully hide the face of the child is given by law here in Europe.
But yes, it is nice to see Hiddles dad
Zawe looks beautiful 
I hate they’ve had these splashed over the paper but what a beautiful family
I hate they’ve had these splashed over the paper but what a beautiful familyIt should be a universal law!!! It is a mandatory thing where I'm from too.
My Sis specialises in podiatry and orthotics, until a baby can walk they shouldn't have 'pram' shoes like these. They can restrict movement and growth.
I’m sure the baby doesn’t wear them all day. He’s outside on a chilly day and they want his feet to be warm. The kid will be fine.
Going back to my tin-hatter theory, I wonder if there's any correlation to this:
Disney to fire 4,000 workers in April: report
Disney is planning to shed some $5.5 billion in costs as part of Bob Iger’s turnaround effort.
www.google.com