Except from what we've been told, the most recent scans and biopsies indicate that she apparently HAS had a significant delayed response.Tiffany had virtually no response to NCRT,
I agree, the "how" this has happened now all of a sudden has never been explained.
I'm confused by that too. Perhaps whatever information Tiffany provides today can fill in some of the missing gaps how she now fits the "WW" criteria. None of the research I read speaks of ANY surgical removal of any remaining mass following a WW program. I don't understand how surgery is suddenly no longer necessary. I also don't know how other information she's relayed (scar tissue, mucin, etc.) factor into the analysis.If the tumour isn't being removed as part of treatment, that would change her staging to IV
So much of "success" now unfortunately is measured by social media following. I am still getting used to the idea that people are earning an extremely good living with a YT channel alone!As somebody who has jadedly worked in publishing for a long time, I can tell you that the sort of 'book' she is writing is probably exactly the sort of book that a publisher would get excited about as nowadays they tend to sign people on the size of their social media following above all else.
Yes, but according to the research I just shared, watch and wait and surgical routes both have comparable outcomes.It's weird though according to stats there is a good five year survival rate for stage 3, which is localized advanced colorectal cancer. I would think surgery should be encouraged by the doctor not a wait and watch
Last edited: