Id have asked them if they thought it was appropriate to wear a picture of a child they'd never met.....but i am rudeI seen someone wearing the t shirt with J on today whilst shopping.I didn’t know where to look. I just find it all so distasteful, shocking and sad. I really feel for his dads side having to put up with this.
I really hope she takes down the products with his photo..I think she might be putting items on that don’t involve photos of jaxon after the argument this weekend . Legally she does not have his fathers permission and jaxon was his son too . But knowing kaytee she thinks she is untouchable so more than likely has done T-shirt’s with different photos of him on !!!!
Hardly surprising with Kathleen is it. Is she still selling the T-shirt’s with Js face and Amgel wings on? I can’t imagine how distressing this all must be for the dad and family if this isn’t what they wantJust so you all know . Not only is this women going behind jaxons fathers wishes and carrying on making money from his death she is also ripping people off . NIKE ADIDAS UNDER ARMOUR are all big brands that have been around for many years and good quality clothing and they are not even charging that much for a pair of shorts . The T-shirt’s with the numbers 398 you can have personalised T-shirt’s printed for as little as 2.99 she is charging £25 again she is using cheap material plus postage !! She’s a fraud and a absolute disgrace to carry this on !!!
Well yeah, because she’s using a white label on demand printing service, which is basically the most expensive way you can possibly produce anything (the fewer you print / make, the greater the per unit cost). She’s having to sell at ridiculous prices because each unit costs a ridiculous price to produce - but it’s also the absolute laziest path of least resistance imaginable, which is why she’s picked it.I’m really annoyed if I’m honest tonight more because she is carrying this shit show on when it’s in bad taste and not what people wants!!! She’s charging £54 for a men’s short set plain black just with the numbers 398 . BOOHOO man is a popular website they are charging just £17 some are cheaper for a men’s shorts set . KAYTEE IS CHARGING £22 for a plain vest with 398 on it plus postage bringing it to £26 for a bloody vest !! BOOHOO MAN charge just 3.50 for their brand logo vests plus free delivery sometimes . I mean she’s robbing people blind not only is it based on a child who is no longer here and against family’s wishes she’s fina profiting from it all whilst ripping people off !!! These big brands make Millions and don’t charge the price she is
I don’t think they can. I remember reading about a case of a celeb (I think maybe Rihanna but this could be wrong) and a paparazzi took a photo that ended up on some widely selling shirt somewhere and she didn’t get a single penny and couldn’t do anything about it, because she didn’t own the copyright of the photo even though it was her faceI seriously wonder if you could make a legal case out of it.
Ah I remember… that’s true… slightly different when the photo in question is that of a minor though I wonder if that changes thingsI don’t think they can. I remember reading about a case of a celeb (I think maybe Rihanna but this could be wrong) and a paparazzi took a photo that ended up on some widely selling shirt somewhere and she didn’t get a single penny and couldn’t do anything about it, because she didn’t own the copyright of the photo even though it was her face
I remember this, I think it was Topshop!I don’t think they can. I remember reading about a case of a celeb (I think maybe Rihanna but this could be wrong) and a paparazzi took a photo that ended up on some widely selling shirt somewhere and she didn’t get a single penny and couldn’t do anything about it, because she didn’t own the copyright of the photo even though it was her face
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?