The Royal Family #46

[Pinkpenguinx]

And Dobby.

Then when W&C got home, Master gave Dobby a baseball cap.

Dobby is freeeeee

 

[LittleBirdie]

Ahhhh, that would be the facelift.....

And she’s walking differently because of the BBL

 

[InTheDollsHouse]

Dobby is freeeeee

Off to sell his story to The Sun

 

[soupmodel]

And Dobby.

Then when W&C got home, Master gave Dobby a baseball cap.

Me misreading this as the WC

 

[corron]

I stood beside Princess Kate at shop and saw her laughing with staff at meat counter, says dad who filmed royals | The Sun

Man who filmed her

 

[MemoryLane]

If they’re saying some one accessed Kate’s medical information, Isn’t that logged? I’m not a nurse and I don’t work for the NHS but I thought it left a trail? As in, if you looked at some ones info, the system would show you’d looked it up. Or is it different in private hospitals?

 

[Sideboard Bob]

We’re going to look back at the whole mania of ”where’s Kate” and think “wtf was all that about”.

I’ve not seen anything such a random and unexpected response to something since the panic-buying of toilet roll at the start of Covid.

 

[soupmodel]

We’re going to look back at the whole mania of ”where’s Kate” and think “wtf was all that about”.

I’ve not seen anything such a random and unexpected response to something since the panic-buying of toilet roll at the start of Covid.

I'm honestly just here for the memes

 

[Sideboard Bob]

I'm honestly just here for the memes

Omg yeah, I do love the memesl it’s been up there with the Willy Wonka Experience!

 

[soupmodel]

Omg yeah, I do love the memesl it’s been up there with the Willy Wonka Experience!

Guuurl, look:

 

[Don'tlookEthel]

Again I think the wrong language is being used here. They didn't just take a photo and edit it. All available evidence suggests it is a combination of more than one photo and/or was not taken in 2024. Issuing false images to media agencies is a big deal. Especially given the issues about fake news, AI generated content etc. It's silly IMO to insert the stuff about Andrew etc in response to my comment. I am replying to posts about it being an edited social media post like many others. But it is not like a celebrity having vanity edits made to an original image.

While it may have generated some sympathy for her, it also brought various rumours about the couple into the mainstream. That is absolutely an example of why I think this has backfired. Doing absolutely nothing and having a PR friendly interview about whatever part of her illness she wishes o discuss would have garnered more sympathy. Creating a global series of rumours about whether she is even alive and having US talk shows querying if the Marquess of UpTheBumley will be replacing her is less positive.

Really excellent points, and made me realise a few things (hearts and minds) and I love marquess of upthebumley

 

[Yano]

Her legs are so skinny cos they take the fat for the bbl hope that helps xx

 

[mrsX]

If they’re saying some one accessed Kate’s medical information, Isn’t that logged? I’m not a nurse and I don’t work for the NHS but I thought it left a trail? As in, if you looked at some ones info, the system would show you’d looked it up. Or is it different in private hospitals?

I'm in nz. I used to work in hr in Healthcare.
So diff systems. But I imagine the same.

But yes everything would be logged.
They can track every file you've looked into.
Every keystroke if they need too.

They'd know who and when someone accessed her file.

I imagine they would be asked to justify why they accessed her file.

It's not ok. Everyone deserves privacy while getting medical care.

 

[Flibbertigibbet]

We’re going to look back at the whole mania of ”where’s Kate” and think “wtf was all that about”.

I’ve not seen anything such a random and unexpected response to something since the panic-buying of toilet roll at the start of Covid.

The nearest thing to it I can think of was in 1985 in Ireland, when we were still in a long and dismal recession and that Summer the weather was really really bad, not just rain but floods and the hay was ruined, and someone said they saw a statue move. It was a statue of the Virgin Mary in a grotto in the arse end of nowhere in Co. Cork. Well didn't the whole country go mad altogether and head down to Ballinspittle to see it, and the next thing you know there were moving Virgin Mary statues up and down the country, and people were going on about optical illusions and the power of suggestion, but they were still getting mad into it. Then it all died down and we forgot about it.

 

[H.R. Pufnstuf]

Neither me, nor my husband wear a wedding ring at home. Occasionally when we go out, one of us might forget to put it on
There are also fairy lights above our fireplace, but it’s definitely March. I kept them because it’s been a long winter and they look pretty.

Beginning to wonder if I really exist or if I’m generated by AI

If you are AI then you’re my clone. I could have written this post!
---

The nearest thing to it I can think of was in 1985 in Ireland, when we were still in a long and dismal recession and that Summer the weather was really really bad, not just rain but floods and the hay was ruined, and someone said they saw a statue move. It was a statue of the Virgin Mary in a grotto in the arse end of nowhere in Co. Cork. Well didn't the whole country go mad altogether and head down to Ballinspittle to see it, and the next thing you know there were moving Virgin Mary statues up and down the country, and people were going on about optical illusions and the power of suggestion, but they were still getting mad into it. Then it all died down and we forgot about it.

OMG, yes! Both I and Mr Puf’n’Stuf’ were taken as kids to Ballinspittle by our respective families back in the day. My aunt’s husband claimed he saw it move. I was 12 at the time and thought he was nuts. I’ve passed that grotto a few times since, all quiet now but mad to think of the mania at the time.

 

[Grifty Mc]

Presumably now that we all know and "accept" that photos can be photoshopped and played around with, it sets the groundwork for Andrew to suggest his most infamous photo to date was the product of Photoshop too???

I remember someone claiming online somewhere that it was a photoshop a couple of years ago. If he hadn’t done that stupid sweaty betty interview it could have just gone away. But then he broke the golden rule- never complain, never explain.
I’m half expecting the queen to come back from the dead at this stage at Easter to sort out this mess ffs!
---

We’re going to look back at the whole mania of ”where’s Kate” and think “wtf was all that about”.

I’ve not seen anything such a random and unexpected response to something since the panic-buying of toilet roll at the start of Covid.

The loo roll was a mental thing as when we were stuck in our houses we could have just had a quick shower. I was panic buying wine as they threatened to close the off licences here lol

 

[stanleycupgal]

The palace created the storm around Kate. We can't pretend that the posts about Kate from the palace since the Mother's Day post have been anything other than incredibly poor.

People were hardly "crazy" for spotting an obviously edited and dubious image. Had they posted almost anything else with a caption saying Kate was contunuing to recover, there would not have been the gossip we have seen over the last week. It's reasonable to ask "but why did they clearly photoshop in Kate's head from another picture"?

Before Mother's Day it was a niche subsection of social media talking about her wellbeing. Their post led to people retrospectively analysing the clearly odd behaviour from the palace. This aggressive form of calling people crazy for any sort of suggestion that things have been a little odd is very OTT. Particularly given it's a site built on gossip.

Gossip, not barking mad conspiracy theories!

 

[Yel]

I'm in nz. I used to work in hr in Healthcare.
So diff systems. But I imagine the same.

But yes everything would be logged.
They can track every file you've looked into.
Every keystroke if they need too.

They'd know who and when someone accessed her file.

I imagine they would be asked to justify why they accessed her file.

It's not ok. Everyone deserves privacy while getting medical care.

I don't know about England healthcare stuff, but here everyone has their own card and id imagine it's all locked down in private hospital so that users have to be given permission for each patient to access their data.

Although with people leaving their cards about and easy to look over someone's shoulder for a password there's no guarantee that the login used to access was by that person.

It sounds more like someone tried to access her file, got a denied message, it was logged and an alarm triggered. If they actually got data I think they'd of sold it to tmz for enough to buy a house and it would have been out there quicker than the story of this "hack".

 

[Grifty Mc]

I don't know about England healthcare stuff, but here everyone has their own card and id imagine it's all locked down in private hospital so that users have to be given permission for each patient to access their data.

Although with people leaving their cards about and easy to look over someone's shoulder for a password there's no guarantee that the login used to access was by that person.

It sounds more like someone tried to access her file, got a denied message, it was logged and an alarm triggered. If they actually got data I think they'd of sold it to tmz for enough to buy a house and it would have been out there quicker than the story of this "hack".

View attachment 2825790

I think the Mail are deliberately using a photo where she looks a bit ‘older’ there.

 

[Libbylulu]

A lot of that is rumour spread after she died. Coincidentally at a time when Charles and Camilla were looking for approval to marry.

Julia Carling was a presenter on The Big Breakfast and she made no secret of her hatred of Diana during the papers review. I remember it well. This was before Diana died