Do you not think it’s maybe just entirely AI generated? It’s so easy to do now and they’re so lifelike. Kate might have done this herself if she doesn’t feel like being photographed.I think they can't send over the originals because they probably also changed a face or something and admitting to that would make it even worse. Of course that stuff is all perfectly normal to do, but you wouldn't want the original and edited to be compared.
I genuinely can’t see any additional fingers here! His index finger is bent in half and his middle and ring fingers are crossed. Thumb and pinkie where you’d expect them to be
Yes he looks awful and that was a month ago.it looks like a reflection of light on the folds in his collar but that doesn’t make sense since we can see on his shoulder that the light is coming from the right.
He does not look well at all, even after any potential editing.
With respect, that's not what the world's four biggest and most respected global news agencies are saying. A kill notice is a big deal in journalism.We have definitely jumped the shark with this one. What a load of fuss over nothing. Who doesn't edit their photos these days? So the execution of it wasn't perfect - so what? The tin foil hattery os reaching Covid levels. The poor woman has had major surgery and has already said she wouldn't be back until Easter. I'm sure all of their official photos are retouched. This one just doesn't pass quality control. There is really nothing more to see here.
You are spot on! I’m sticking by what I’ve been told. There is no way K would not have at least her wedding ring on for sure.At this point I'm honestly starting to give some credence to the divorce rumours. I think they've split due to that Rosie Cholmoneley-dingdong-whateverhernameis and Kate just isn't cooperating with playing happy families in public. The Palace tried to manipulate an old photo to bring certain details, like teeth or hair or whatever, up to date, and didn't do it well enough. Oooh dear.
This is exactly what I think. I doubt she’d even had surgery to be honest. I know I’ll get shot down for it again, but the whole situation has been iffy since day one. I don’t necessarily think it’s about Rose, marriage is hard work. Especially when you have 3 young kids and the whole world watching you. She’s done her job in providing a heir, a spare and given them no scandal. I like Kate, I don’t like William. His whole demeanour is false to me. Typical arrogant toff. He’s the future KOE, I think it’s probably the personality type of everyone who grows up in his position.At this point I'm honestly starting to give some credence to the divorce rumours. I think they've split due to that Rosie Cholmoneley-dingdong-whateverhernameis and Kate just isn't cooperating with playing happy families in public. The Palace tried to manipulate an old photo to bring certain details, like teeth or hair or whatever, up to date, and didn't do it well enough. Oooh dear.
I don’t think that’s what they’re saying. AP is quoted in the guardian as follows:With respect, that's not what the world's four biggest and most respected global news agencies are saying. A kill notice is a big deal in journalism.
Reuters, AP and AfP aren't killing the story because the photoshop execution 'wasn't perfect'. If they routinely did that, then no photo of any celeb ever since about 1980 would be distributed by the news agencies!
They're killing it because they doubt the veracity of the story of the photo - ie that it shows an image of Kate and the children taken by William earlier this week.
And yes that is a big deal.
It would have been safer having Kate pose holding the day’s Daily Mail with the date visible than this palaver.The issue here is this photo is effectively supposed to be proof that Kate is ok.
It's not easy to do that. You can't just mix and match images. You have to get the light to match exactly, otherwise it's really obvious.I think its quite obvious what has happened....Kate isn't ready to be photographed (rightly so after an op) so they've taken an old pic of her and edited the kids in and made out (or was it the press) it was a recent pic, THAT was the first mistake IMO.
He lost his power when he lost his hair.Yes, in all fairness William isn’t liked anywhere near as much as he thought he’d be.
You know I saw this meme online about how every time a man cheats, god removes some of his hair! And looking at every bald man I know in my life, they have all cheated!He lost his power when he lost his hair.
Right, so in that case the photo they were supplied does not "maintain the authentic nature of the photograph" and/or "substantially alter the original scene".I don’t think that’s what they’re saying. AP is quoted in the guardian as follows:
Associated Press said that according to its “news values and principles”, minor edits to photos including cropping, toning and colour adjustment are “acceptable when necessary for clear and accurate reproduction and should maintain the authentic nature of the photograph”
It added that “changes in density, contrast, color and saturation levels that substantially alter the original scene are not acceptable. Backgrounds should not be digitally blurred or eliminated by burning down or by aggressive toning. The removal of ‘red eye’ from photographs is not permissible.”
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?