She's a princess by marriage. She would be Princess Henry and not Princess Meghan.
She's a princess by marriage. She would be Princess Henry and not Princess Meghan.Also not up on it, but I don’t think Meghan is a princess? I thought that Kate only became one when William became Prince of Wales because she was then married to the heir to the thrown? Definitely could be wrong.
But she’s not known as that, which is why I thought she wasn’t a princess in any definition tbh. It’s an easy marketing win for them for her to also be a Princess.But if not every British person knows this, then you can guarantee not many in the US will, so Meghan would be Princess Meghan over there in a heartbeat.
Anyone more well-versed in royalty than I am know why Camilla got the Queen title while Philip was stuck with Prince all his life? Both were married to a monarch.The late Queen never said she was to be called Queen Consort Camilla, she said that Camilla would be Queen Consort rather than Princess Consort.
Charles hasn't changed anything hence me pulling it up when you said he had.
People that get obsessed over the consort part, usually don't understand what consort means and think it's a way of showing someone is a lesser version of Queen when that's not the case at all.
Because a King outranks a Queen, so he couldn't hold that title as he wasn't a reigning monarch.Anyone more well-versed in royalty than I am know why Camilla got the Queen title while Philip was stuck with Prince all his life? Both were married to a monarch.
Of course, but I mean Diana was never Princess Diana but rather Diana, Princess of Wales and we all call her Princess Di. Common usage may not line up with what is correct.But if not every British person knows this, then you can guarantee not many in the US will, so Meghan would be Princess Meghan over there in a heartbeat.
No, my point was linked to them removing the titles. I think MM wouldn't mind if they did because though she would then be Princess Henry, everyone would call her Princess Meghan.But she’s not known as that, which is why I thought she wasn’t a princess in any definition tbh. It’s an easy marketing win for them for her to also be a Princess.
Thought exactly the same but then I saw elsewhere that they are rarely photographed and clearly allowed the close enough pics, perhaps in exchange for sitting on something, who knows. But agree it can't be critical or urgent.Just to change the subject slightly - for all those making up conspiracy theories about what is actually wrong with Catherine - her sister is currently in St. Barts with her family on holiday. I feel like if my sister was in mortal danger I wouldn't be swimming in the sea in St. Barts? In other words Catherine is fine, she's just recovering at home.
Princess Di never actually was Princess Di and we all know how that went.But if not every British person knows this, then you can guarantee not many in the US will, so Meghan would be Princess Meghan over there in a heartbeat.
I’m always seeing pictures of her showcasing her toned midriff and enjoying beach days. The annual trip to Dt Bart’s is a pap holiday. She ain’t exactly camera shy.Thought exactly the same but then I saw elsewhere that they are rarely photographed and clearly allowed the close enough pics, perhaps in exchange for sitting on something, who knows. But agree it can't be critical or urgent.
Because there is no such title as King Consort as a King always outranks Queen. it ticked Albert and Victoria off no end. Philip was Prince Consort, the same as Albert.Anyone more well-versed in royalty than I am know why Camilla got the Queen title while Philip was stuck with Prince all his life? Both were married to a monarch.
They’ve been photographed loads of times on their holidays.Thought exactly the same but then I saw elsewhere that they are rarely photographed and clearly allowed the close enough pics, perhaps in exchange for sitting on something, who knows. But agree it can't be critical or urgent.
Not too sure about that, there is precedent with Princess Michael of Kent, I have never seen her referred to as Princess Marie-Christine.But if not every British person knows this, then you can guarantee not many in the US will, so Meghan would be Princess Meghan over there in a heartbeat.
I was always very confused by that as a kid. Why was a woman called Michael? Just assumed it was one of those weird things that super-posh people did.Not too sure about that, there is precedent with Princess Michael of Kent, I have never seen her referred to as Princess Marie-Christine.
I doubt Princess Michael is well known in the US.Not too sure about that, there is precedent with Princess Michael of Kent, I have never seen her referred to as Princess Marie-Christine.
That could happen, yes, so it's just as well she has the duchess handle for them to useI doubt Princess Michael is well known in the US.
The poster was referring to the US. In the UK she’d never be called Princess Meghan but in the US it is likely she would as I doubt they’d call her Princess Henry.
I’ve heard US media refer to Kate/Catherine as Princess Kate/Catherine which is also incorrect so they’d do the same with Meghan.
I think with Diana she was called Princess Diana (albeit incorrectly) because prior to marriage she was Lady Diana so people assumed upon marriage she’d be “upgraded” to Princess Diana.Only a royal born can be called Princess First Name, so yes Princess Diana was the incorrect title, just as Princess Kate and Meghan are too (although Diana and Kate were/are the Princess of wales through marriage).
However both Kate and Meghan are listed as being 'Princess of the United Kingdom' on the children's birth certificates.
I agree but I guess with Marie-Christine, nobody had even heard of her until she married Prince Michael, so she just became Princess Michael. Unlike Meghan who is already called Princess Meghan by the Sussex Squad on X..Not too sure about that, there is precedent with Princess Michael of Kent, I have never seen her referred to as Princess Marie-Christine.
It’s because Princess is actually her occupation, not her title as bonkers as it sounds.I think with Diana she was called Princess Diana (albeit incorrectly) because prior to marriage she was Lady Diana so people assumed upon marriage she’d be “upgraded” to Princess Diana.
Neither Kate or Meghan had titles prior to marriage so they were never called Princess afterwards. It is odd they are named as princesses on the birth certificates but I suppose they’ve nothing else to put in the occupation box!
I do find it strange when the media still refer to them by their maiden names though.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?