Indeed. Harry says Meghan was going through a lot with her dad at that stage as well which is why the messages back to Kate were a bit abrupt so if she did cry maybe it was the straw that broke the camel’s back, in isolation Kate didn’t make her cry, it was the stress of everything.I'm so tired of the who really cried drama? Even if we saw CCTV footage of one of them bawling their eyes out it wouldn't tell us anything about the argument. Just because you're crying doesn't mean you're the one in the right.
I think he keeps flogging the bridesmaid dress dead horse because he can’t understand how everyone isn’t saying ‘oh poor Meghan’ rather than the ‘is that it … sounds about par for the wedding stress course’He and the publishing house probably made sure not to quote too much directly and keep it to relevant parts that are discussed. That’s what went wrong with the letter and is the biggest reason they won the lawsuit.
But who is he to say Kate didn’t cry? Charlotte cried. And I can absolutely see a women being 4 weeks postpartum crying as well simply because of the stress and frustration of the situation. Same for M. She had a lot of stress and pressure. At least one has the realisation it was an unnecessary argument. My guess, she expected not just a don’t worry about it but also an I am sorry too. By the way, are you ok? How are you holding up after baby? Is everything going smoothly?
I also don’t get his story about W&K and M. They religiously watched Suits and he humble bragged they might want an autograph of M. But they also didn’t like her because of Hollywood? What is it? That’s the couple that has been more than once criticised for loving to rub shoulders with Hollywood. I won’t forget how smug he mentioned that he thinks no one would have thought him capable of bagging someone like her. Those two feed of each other in very unhealthy ways sometimes. Not saying their love isn’t genuine. But there are always more underlying things at work in choosing a partner. He obviously wanted someone similar to his mother or at least on the same humanitarian path. How is that any different (read better) than W wanting someone to fit into his predetermined life? Both couples clearly love each other in their own ways. But it seems the Stallion is incapable of rationality when it regards himself.
Spot on! I have a narcissist in-law.He says the press are bad to the females in the royal family yet he is happy to throw Kate under the bus constantly, the mother of his 3 young nephews and niece.
if he truly felt that the press is so dangerous and saw what megan went through, he would never want to put someone else through it.
If we go through something truly traumatic we would never wish that on our own worse enemy let alone familh, yet he is more than happy to disregard kate and camilla’s feeling here because he is angry at his brother and daddy and knows thats the best way to get to them.
Pathetic man child.
Oh but that's way too reasonable!Indeed. Harry says Meghan was going through a lot with her dad at that stage as well which is why the messages back to Kate were a bit abrupt so if she did cry maybe it was the straw that broke the camel’s back, in isolation Kate didn’t make her cry, it was the stress of everything.
Much like if Kate cried it was because she had just given birth, her daughter cried and it was all a bit stressful as opposed to Meghan
I think the Clarkson article was probably after printing had happened so I think he was sadly just using her as an example of what could happen to Meghan at the hands of the pressThe reference to Caroline Flack is possibly because her mom rang LBC and discussed the comments Clarkson made about Meghan. Harry was not using her. Her own mother made it very clear she was not impressed with the treatment the media were once again dishing out to yet another woman!
To quote another famous ginge, "money's too tight to mention?"The back-peddling on the racism stuff is very strange. They must have an agenda
I assume that‘s directed at me as I mentioned Harry using Caroline Flack’s name to profit from. Harry’s book was written well before the vile comments from Clarkson, where Harry mentions Caroline. And as for Caroline‘s mother mentioning her daughter, that’s her right as her mother, it doesn’t make it ok for Harry to do. You might be okay if someone spoke about your deceased child in that way I certainly wouldn’t and I’m not sure many parents would be okay with that. You state Harry didn’t use Caroline, are you saying he got her mother‘s permission then? Or are you just assuming it’s okay because it’s okay with you, because that isn’t what those are saying who were very close to Caroline.The reference to Caroline Flack is possibly because her mom rang LBC and discussed the comments Clarkson made about Meghan. Harry was not using her. Her own mother made it very clear she was not impressed with the treatment the media were once again dishing out to yet another woman!
I don’t know. As like everyone else on this thread it’s assumptions we make. The account that made the Insta post having a go could have remained quiet, also. They soon jumped in with a public comment. Why? Because it brings them a bit of clout to!Harry’s book was written well before the Clarkson episode where Harry mentions Caroline. And as for Caroline‘s mother mentioning her daughter, that’s her right as her mother, it doesn’t make it ok for Harry to do. You might be okay if someone spoke about your deceased child in that way I certainly wouldn’t and I’m not sure many parents would be okay with that. You state Harry didn’t use Caroline, are you saying he got her mother‘s permission then? Or are you just assuming it’s okay because it’s okay with you, because that isn’t what those are saying who were very close to Caroline.
Why shouldn’t her former manager speak out if that’s who you are talking about? How about Harry being respectful and not dragging the deceased into his book, when does he take accountability?I don’t know. As like everyone else on this thread it’s assumptions we make. The account that made the Insta post having a go could have remained quiet, also. They soon jumped in with a public comment. Why? Because it brings them a bit of clout to!
That agent's quotes were a bit weird imo. Saying how Harry is using her name for book sales and how it's gross for him to reveal private details about Caroline.I don’t know. As like everyone else on this thread it’s assumptions we make. The account that made the Insta post having a go could have remained quiet, also. They soon jumped in with a public comment. Why? Because it brings them a bit of clout to!
You reckon caroline asked harry if it was ok to mention him in her book?Why shouldn’t her former manager speak out if that’s who you are talking about? How about Harry being respectful and not dragging the deceased into his book, when does he take accountability?
You‘re the one stating Harry didn’t use Caroline Flack, how is that not using someone, mentioning them in your book (you’ve sold to the highest bidder) when you clearly don’t have their permission as they’re deceased.
So that makes it okay? The difference is if it bothered Harry he could have said something, that’s something the deceased cannot do and raking up the past about a loved one who has died can be incredibly traumatic for their loved ones, or don’t their feelings matter either?That agent's quotes were a bit weird imo. Saying how Harry is using her name for book sales and how it's gross for him to reveal private details about Caroline.
Harry's not revealed anything that Caroline hadn't already said in her own biography!! Pretty sure using her name won't make a difference to sales either.
You reckon caroline asked harry if it was ok to mention him in her book?
Her ex manager doesn’t need to speak for her either. Didn’t they all drop her when the DV allegations came out? Pretty sure they did. If her Mom wants to ring LBC again and criticise Harry I’d say ok, she’s more than entitled! The fact she rang LBC up in the first place, to say how appalled she was at the way Clarkson spoke about Meghan, I can’t see her ringing them up again to rage at them! She raked up the bad feeling over Caroline’s death in her own words to James O’Brien!
Yes I remember her speaking quite a few times about Harry. She also spoke of the abuse she received when dating Harry Styles too!
To be fair, Caroline wrote about Harry in her book.I assume that‘s directed at me as I mentioned Harry using Caroline Flack’s name to profit from. Harry’s book was written well before the vile comments from Clarkson, where Harry mentions Caroline. And as for Caroline‘s mother mentioning her daughter, that’s her right as her mother, it doesn’t make it ok for Harry to do. You might be okay if someone spoke about your deceased child in that way I certainly wouldn’t and I’m not sure many parents would be okay with that. You state Harry didn’t use Caroline, are you saying he got her mother‘s permission then? Or are you just assuming it’s okay because it’s okay with you, because that isn’t what those are saying who were very close to Caroline.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?