Isa_Drennan
VIP Member
Did I mistakenly set my alarm for 1950 when I went to bed last night?I think my avatar picture is, hats off to her, Britain's most successful whore
Did I mistakenly set my alarm for 1950 when I went to bed last night?I think my avatar picture is, hats off to her, Britain's most successful whore
She's not a stay at home mum though! We are paying for her to work and what both William and Kate do is minimal, and interspersed with a lot of holidays. They both use the ' stay at home parent' excuse for this, but they have two school aged children, a nanny and numerous other staff. What's the nanny doing if she's a stay at home mum? The most annoying thing is that she is put up as the perfect woman ( particularly this week) when she has married someone, had some kids and wears clothes. I doubt she does that many unrecorded visits. The Cambridges work numbers are so low, you can bet they would record everything they do!Yes it is an anachronism and hopefully will be disbanded in due course.
But with regard to Catherine every woman (or man) can choose to be a stay at home mum/dad and shouldn't be criticised for that. She does a lot of visits which aren't recorded.
I completely agree with every word of this.Harry and Meghan deserve some of the flak they (even a LOT of it!).
However, Harry has DEFINITELY been thrown under the bus. This has always happened to the spare but this is far nastier. Things were OK when Harry knew his place as joker brother but we’re always going to turn sour when he brought a wife onto the scene. Kate had some negative press but the Meghan stuff (whatever we think of her) is really quite disturbing.
Harry is spoilt and didn’t handle it well but it must have been devastating to see stories constantly leaked about the woman he loves.
It’s all SO dysfunctional.
Harry can’t be compared with Princess Anne - she is Princess Royale, would have been offered more protection and is a different character anyway. Agree she could have mentored but they don’t seem to be that type of family.
The puff pieces on William approaching his 40th areEven the disastrous Caribbean tour not his fault in any way. He is a saint and Harry the weak devil! Even footage of William actually interacting with one of his children other than George trotted out! It’s all this constant PR spin that makes me sick of them.
As for the whole Early Years thing….
The media hates Meghan so they build Kate up. Before Meghan came along, they were far more critical of Kate, they called her 'Waity Katy' and 'the Duchess of Doolittle'.That's daft hyperbole. Has no-one got used to the media yet??? She's a woman in the public eye who appears to be kind and family orientated. No-one is perfect.
Same with Meghan but she seems to create a lot of discord because she's quite dishonest. Hopefully her and H will settle down a bit more, I don't think they're sure of their direction as yet.
Oh I think homeboy Tindall cares a LOT about his image and keeping in with the right royals. Harry is spoilt and misguided but he shows amazing empathy and charm at times. Tindall is just a rich boy putting on act. Don’t get the love for him!
This seems pretty funny if true, Harry seems the kinda guy who would be raging reading this and Mike’s the type to not care
I know it became a Megxit thing to say, but Harry really does look bloody miserable in those photos
So, basically they have no ideaLilibet's first birthday probably had something to do with it being a nominated family day, and the fact that they don't seem to be very welcome in the family from everything that has been shown
I saw some tabloid speculating that they may have had Lilibet's christening in private yesterday also
That photo is so for the camera.Meghan looks totally besotted in that photo!
Another poster on here says she volunteers at a shelter and William often volunteers there too and there is zero publicity. She said the supervisor treats him no differently to the other volunteers and he has to muck in cleaning up the mess just as the others do. There is no preferential treatment.It’s ridiculous that people can’t see the irony in a Prince pretending to be down with ‘ordinary’ people by selling the Big Issue then buggering off home to a bloody palace, whilst waffling about how much he cares about homelessness.![]()
I’m pretty sure that particular ship has already sailed. (Allegedly)Yes quite. Mike Tindall is really bigging up his part as 'The People's Prince' isn't he? If he's not cashing in on his Royal connections, then I don't know who is! He'd better not do the dirty on Zara ( or hope Zara doesn't bin him)or he'll be out in the cold with the rest of them.
I know someone who is a genuine red head who calls those with dyed red hair ‘Fred’s’ (fake reds)Makes me laugh about red heads as I am one also my sons ...women well the majority do..dye their hair red if you look around...plus it's the only colour to have good pigmentation that we don't go grey quick....
Genuinely, sometimes wonder if some folk have too much spare time on their hands.
Someone was asking who a man in uniform was and provided a picture on here but I can't find you. This tells you who he is and what his "role" was regarding M and H. It also mentions Peter Phillips giving M the Royal Cut which seems to have been missed by everyone. It says the Queen is a good chess player
p.s. comments section is interesting...
It's a bit of a nasty ' joke'. As if he's mocking people who genuinely can't afford lunches for their kids. I don't know his background but you don't need to be poor to know that there are people who will not find it funny that the husband of the Queens granddaughter is moaning about the cost of living! I don't know what it is with the younger Royals. They seem to lack the empathy of The Queen, Charles Camilla and Anne. They seem to want to pretend to be ' just like you' when everyone knows they are not. It's condescending.Perhaps Mike Tindall was making a joke about not being able to afford his children's lunches as an analogy about price increases.
But that does rile the general public, it's not funny to quite a few.
That's hardly the revelation of the century! Charles and Camilla, William and Kate are hardly exciting! The most exciting thing about the Royals is when they have some kind of scandal.Was Omid Scobie always a royal commentator who has his input only come about from his interest in Meghan? I see he’s called the future of the royal family dull after the Queen passes now the Sussexes won’t be involved
Promoting and highlighting the work of actual experts is fine. Pretending that you are an expert when you are not, or getting PR people to tell other people how hard youve been 'working' is just silly.It was the British people who elected this Conservative Government, in part to sort out the deficit Labour left in 2010, not the royals. The royals can't vote. However nothing wrong with them promoting specific issues or meeting government Ministers as long as they avoid getting too party political
Didn't do Justin Trudeau too much harm, he was re elected after his blackface photos were published. Lots of people have youthful experiences that weren't perfect