exactly this. the only time Sue would consider donating any of their excessive stash of toys to charity or donate to a food bank or even give a moment of thought to the families less fortunate than her, like those in similar situations to that alternative ad she shared which supposedly "hit her hard" is if she can sue it for content. if - and it's a big
if - she shares a story of herself dropping off a box at a food back or films a vlog collecting up a few of the kids' unused toys to donate to families less fortunate who are struggling to afford presents for their kids - or it is included in footage filmed by channel 5
- guaranteed that will be the only time it ever happens. she may consider donating to charity, if she can use it to create content, knowing it will work to her benefit and newspapers will leap on her "kindness" and "generous" and write stories which make her out to be a half-decent human being - but we all know she would only be doing it as a one of, because it works to her advantage, and selfish Sue only thinks about herself.
she would simply use it as a photo op, posing as she threw a few cans of beans into the food donation box at her local supermarket, to give the impression that donating to charity and using her wealth to help others is something she does on a regular basis, when in actuality, she doesn't give anyone - other than herself - a second thought. but while she's out shopping for new rugs and showing off even more presents for the kids, the minions be defending her from criticism by reminding everyone that even though "they don't claim benefits", they even use their own hard-earned money to help the needy, despite having 22 kids of their own.