Omg I can’t believe I just read that. I presume these people with 16 kids have really good jobs and lots of money ? Not!!Half them groups think sues is god, there’s a few who are popping out kids every year, some are openly saying they want to beat the family to be uks biggest. It’s so fucking sad , one mum had her 16th refused to bf because that can delay periods , and as soon as shed stopped bleeding she was using opk tests.
Omg I can’t believe I just read that. I presume these people with 16 kids have really good jobs and lots of money ? Not!!
We must be talking about the wrong groups, I know a few have popped up in the last few years and they are radford worshippers, some even vlog.Half them groups think sues is god, there’s a few who are popping out kids every year, some are openly saying they want to beat the family to be uks biggest. It’s so fucking sad , one mum had her 16th refused to bf because that can delay periods , and as soon as shed stopped bleeding she was using opk tests.
Yep these are pretty recent groupsWe must be talking about the wrong groups, I know a few have popped up in the last few years and they are radford worshippers, some even vlog.
But the OG groups going back 8 years, most have seen the real Sue because of the things she has done over the years.
And it dont surprise me, there are some desperate wannabees who think that the Radfords are goals. Its absolutly not.
That actually rings a bellYep these are pretty recent groups
I’m still on some , as sometime su just need to laugh, this was a post last week . Really serious too
Are there any ways to make some extra money without going to work?
I bet all us with a few kids are on some of the same groups, we must be.That actually rings a bell
I would also like to know this. The voiceover said it like it was well known.In this video they say 23 children? is 22 not counting alfie? or is she pregnant again?
In the past they have always included alfie.In this video they say 23 children? is 22 not counting alfie? or is she pregnant again?
If they didn’t include him they wouldn’t be the biggests, theres 6 others with21 . So legally they only have 21 registered children. so any of these other family’s could come forward and they would be one of the biggest not the biggestIn the past they have always included alfie.
But even with Alfie thats still 22
So there are 7 families total in the uk who have 21 childrenIf they didn’t include him they wouldn’t be the biggests, theres 6 others with21 . So legally they only have 21 registered children. so any of these other family’s could come forward and they would be one of the biggest not the biggest
I think they are blended families.So there are 7 families total in the uk who have 21 childrenI'm curious as to who these others are and how they compare to the Radfords. Does anyone know of any of them? If any of them are still actively having babies they could overtake the Radfords, Sue would be livid! I wonder how a giant family actually survives without a magic pie shop, sorry i mean a hefty cheque from channel 5, youtube monetisation and a houseful of gifted items, plus live-in unpaid babysitters
Maybe when they said 23 they were including Samsonthat or they thought there were 22 living children plus little Alfie making 23
HahaI bet all us with a few kids are on some of the same groups, we must be.
I just scrolled a certain group for the first time in ages and thought WTF is wrong with these people, some are deffo Radford lovers. Pretty sure some have lynched me with Jealousy, Magic pie shop, they are lovely bollox.Haha
I’m saying nothing
This is what I don’t get. We know the Radfords managed before they were famous by topping up the pie shop earnings with tax credits, which probably gave them more than what they actually earned. They also bought their first home in the 90s when property prices were low (anyone around in that time probably remembers the housing crash/negative equate and the over supply of houses to buy).Omg I can’t believe I just read that. I presume these people with 16 kids have really good jobs and lots of money ? Not!!
Not as big as the Radfords but we live on one very good wage and no help, we have had help in the past but we bettered our circumstances without exploiting the kids. I wont say what the wage is but we pay the higher tax bracket and although we still claim child benefit it gets paid back at the end of the year in tax.This is what I don’t get. We know the Radfords managed before they were famous by topping up the pie shop earnings with tax credits, which probably gave them more than what they actually earned. They also bought their first home in the 90s when property prices were low (anyone around in that time probably remembers the housing crash/negative equate and the over supply of houses to buy).
Now they sell out their lives and get sponsored for everything so they don’t need to claim. But all these other families who are having to take huge mortgages (or high rents) before they’ve even factored in the basics of feeding and clothing these mega families. How do they manage? I genuinely would love to know how you stretch one salary/income to cover everything.
I had my children young too first at 19 the last at 30(no 4).I'm 36 now and have considered have another(as i have one girl and three boys).When I discussed it with my other children my eldest(17) and youngest(6) said the don't want anymore sibling.Which has made me think don't bother if the others don't want it.Also my husband said when we're in our 40s we will be able to travel more.My point is you should take in consideration of other children of the family as it will affect them too.Sad really I’d hate the life she has .
she’s the same age as my mum and my mums currently taking time of work and travelling with my father enjoying her late 40s after working since 16 paying her mortgage off and raising me and my siblings. My mum had me young but has always worked and always made time for all four of us. I feel sue has no time for each child and it’s just the oldest looking after the youngest it’s sad for them children they have no life . Sue has no life either her and Noel at that age should be enjoying time together like my parents do yet they still have very young babies . What a sad life that must be. Nothing against those having children in 40s but sue has how many children by time they all leave home she will be how old and not lived her life . Nobody will babysit all those children why her and Noel take a weeks holiday
sad really I’d hate that life
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?