Gobi? Sahara? Atacama?
Gobi? Sahara? Atacama?
Well one thing we do know for sure is that she'll get the right hump when she sees that picture!!!Gobi? Sahara? Atacama?
And still can’t bloody spell correctly! ??
Thank you. Credit where it's due then...just a shame that any creative talents aren't put to better use, morally speaking.Footage on vlogs some of it is actually very well done.
Certainly is here tooWell if that happens we can be on it and show footage of his skate videos. That’s fraud well it is here in America. It’s illegal.
Because she's lazy, she doesn't even go to therapy with Izzy!Why even mention his back? She certainly didn’t want to. And why not go with him?
Would Chris be the one doing the kidnapping or the one giving the kidnapper sexual favours????Has anyone seen that horrifying documentary 'Abducted in plain sight' on Netflix? I reckon Creepy and Lazy are the types that could feature in a similar documentary in the future, since they are complicit in exposing their own and other peoples kids to perverts.
Could convincingly be either!Would Chris be the one doing the kidnapping or the one giving the kidnapper sexual favours????
Creepy was definitely there although in that photo he looks like that Slender Man character (as if he's not already scary enough!)This is clearly Creepy going down the slide with all 3 girls.View attachment 6548
Exactly. I read somewhere though that the reason for disabling comments on vlogs involving children is because paedophiles are leaving time stamps in the comments for other paedophiles to see. ??What is the point of YouTube disabling comments if these can be turned back on.
It really defeats the object then ?
I was thinking that in tonight’s thumbnail Isla’s hair looks really tight and pulled back. It made her forehead look huge!Even dull vlogs still raise questions...
When styling the girls' hair, why do they pull it sooooo tight? Not wishing to knock the girls at all, I'm just thinking how much that must really hurt.
Why put more thought into planning how to manage your pic'n'mix sweets and cinema drinks than choosing an age appropriate film to watch?
Why must Sarah always point out that Esme is different to Isla & Isabelle? Of course 'different' can be a great thing but Sarah seems to give it a negative vibe rather than embracing her uniqueness.....like not letting Esme just wear what she wanted ("non-girly" stuff) and making a point of her different spending habits - potential inferiority complex territory, that.
And finally, why so so many "right now"s, right now? Sigh.
Someone has to make a tv series of this - it would be tv goldExactly! Like a caricature. Reminds me a bit of the Bros documentary on TV at Christmas which was (apparently) not meant to be funny but was absolutely hilarious in parts.
I can totally picture him as a Little Britain character but even if you stayed completely true to Chris's real life personality traits and behaviours etc people would find it all way too far-fetched and made up!
God forbid if he did have a genuine back problem and Sarah actually had to become a full time parent.Why even mention his back? She certainly didn’t want to. And why not go with him?
There are other youtubers (under 20 y/o) whose comment sections have also been disabled and their reasoning is for abuse.. so whether it’s a mixture of abusive remarks & inappropriate comments/content?? But yeah they’ve been disabled for a reason so I don’t understandExactly. I read somewhere though that the reason for disabling comments on vlogs involving children is because paedophiles are leaving time stamps in the comments for other paedophiles to see. ??
Any family vloggers who enable the comments section are absolutely vile.
Can they not spell dessert?
And of course, Isabelle's mouth is open.I was thinking that in tonight’s thumbnail Isla’s hair looks really tight and pulled back. It made her forehead look huge!