The MinghamsSo police are investigating Ingham or the man?
The MinghamsSo police are investigating Ingham or the man?
Good on the manager for beating him to it! His threatening comment certainly backfired on him. He's not too bright it seems lol.Chris on one video says " if i take this to social media, you will regret it" now to me that sounds very much like a threat - what exactly did Chris mean by this comment? does he mean he will shame him online or does he mean he will send in his cult to do the work for him, obviously its the latter as the coward wont do anything for himself - I really don't think they are going to spend thousands of pounds on legal teams, think they are blowing hot air myself using the lets scare tactics - Mr kayak doesnt have anything really to answer too :/ the only one that could have a problem is the manager who took him to the caravan is how I see it
So she lied once againResponse from the "Rangers" Sarah spoke to.
This is absolutely huge. Finally. Well done Scotland (again)Section 12 seems to be to do with not protecting a child under 16 in a way which cause injury or death(I have no legal knowledge, it was a quick google).
Iām off out now (ironically my kids are going to a water safety lesson!). Look forward to catching up this evening!
Iām not sure if anyone has contacted them but that is the point isnāt it. We have no idea what they really said or did but The Inghams are selling to their followers their narrative that makes the campsite look terrible. I really think water safety is the most important thing when youāre thinking about booking anything to do with water and a company that thinks that they were ok and also had no idea about the requirements would make me question all of their safety standards. The Inghams are so self absorbed that they have no idea what damage they are doing to this companyās reputation.Have the campsite said anything about what happened or do we just have lazys word for what they said? Has anyone contacted them or had a reply? Ether way they are looking bad they ether promote unsafe water sports or they are allowing lazy to lie to fit her narrative
I canāt imagine that the Camp manager didnāt know who CK was. He runs kayaking trips on the Loch, Iām betting thereās even a leaflet in the reception area included in their what to do on the Loch. The Inghams are quite toxic and have an adverse affect on everything they touch!According to Sarah, the campsite manager was told by CK that he was with the Park Rangers and needed to speak to the Inghams about water safety complaints (who knows if this is true or not). The issue I have with the site manager is that if this was the case then firstly he should have asked for proof of ID, and secondly he should have called Chris and asked him to go up to reception where they should have had a private meeting about it. I don't agree that he should have let CK onto the campsite because, let's face it, he could have been some deranged individual who seriously wanted to cause some harm.
That aside, I think it's far too convenient that all the attention is now being placed on CK and what he did/didn't do and thereby removing the spotlight from Chris and Sarah's gross negligence. Even as Malcom was "mentally done" with the "constant abuse from trolls" he still had the wherewithal to reel in the views with a "Taking a break from YouTube" vlog title Christopher, ffs, not vlogging for a few days is NOT "taking a break from YT", it is simply hiding in the bushes so that your toddler-fam can wave their spears about, and beat their chests, whilst you wait for the tit storm to settle. You ignored all well-intended warnings from a year ago, regarding life vests for your children, so it would seem that the nicely nicely approach doesn't work with you two... CK's approach may well have inadvertently saved one your children's lives so get out from behind those bloody bushes and start handing the pacifiers out because you should be beyond ashamed of yourself.