Thinking about it, no wonder this so called campsite manager or âwitnessâ is supposedly on their side. Theyâve basically thrown this campsite under the bus for having no signs, because in the words of lazy and creepy, âthere were no signs or anything like thatâ. I mean no safety signs near the Loch surrounding life jackets or water aids, even though there is an article stating that a boy drowned? Surely thatâs a massive breech of health and safety. Youâd think after that incident signs would have been put up everywhere, regardless if itâs common sense.
I wouldnât be surprised if the campsite came under fire from health and safety and so to save their own arse theyâre siding with the Ming hams and placing fault on poor Mr Kayak, deflecting away from the fact they didnt have in place the correct safety signs and treating it like theyâre being harassed when really theyâve been caught out.
According to Sarah, the campsite manager was told by CK that he was with the Park Rangers and needed to speak to the Inghams about water safety complaints (who knows if this is true or not). The issue I have with the site manager is that if this was the case then firstly he should have asked for proof of ID, and secondly he should have called Chris and asked him to go up to reception where they should have had a private meeting about it. I don't agree that he should have let CK onto the campsite because, let's face it, he could have been some deranged individual who seriously wanted to cause some harm.
That aside, I think it's far too convenient that all the attention is now being placed on CK and what he did/didn't do and thereby removing the spotlight from Chris and Sarah's gross negligence. Even as Malcom was "mentally done" with the "constant abuse from trolls" he still had the wherewithal to reel in the views with a "Taking a break from YouTube" vlog title
![Roll eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:]()
Christopher, ffs, not vlogging for a few days is NOT "taking a break from YT", it is simply
hiding in the bushes so that your toddler-fam can wave their spears about, and beat their chests, whilst you wait for the tit storm to settle. You ignored all well-intended warnings from a year ago, regarding life vests for your children, so it would seem that the nicely nicely approach doesn't work with you two... CK's approach may well have inadvertently saved one your children's lives so get out from behind those bloody bushes and start handing the pacifiers out because you should be beyond ashamed of yourself.