The problem is 300 people posted on their vlog and were either ignored and deleted so a leaflet would have been straight in the bin. The only way to get through to them is the way the man did. They wouldn’t have even mentioned it had he not filmed it.At risk of being called a fan here (if you look at my other comments you’ll see I’m not) ….. I actually don’t agree with how this man has gone about this. If you approach someone, in their personal space and start telling them they’re putting their children at risk, you’re going to get their backs up and it will only end one way, regardless of what sort of person they are.
Had this man posted an information leaflet through their door on the dangers of lochs and requirements for life vests etc or given it to the site manager to do so, this could have played out entirely differently. I’m not saying the inghams are in the right, but I also don’t think this man is either. He seemed quite antagonistic to me.
*ducks and hides*
Boy have I some catching up to do! I’m just back from London & East Coast of England. Proper visiting London not their BS.If you listen closely Creepy lies and says that they are 15, 13 and 12.
Mr Kayak is saying they are under 18 so they are kids!! Bet he didn’t like that!! See that creepy a man says under 18s are kids, but you think that a 16 year old girls is fair game for skinny dipping!!
Well that’s certainly what happened with the “non situation”. I believe in the now famous (and that’s the only thing famous about the Inghams) HELL NO video that is exactly what Chris used as his defence for saying nothing was that it was in the hands of his “legal team” and they advised him not to confirm or denyWould a lawyer not ask them to not address the situation publicly until they have looked into it? I smell!!
He hardly came at them!! He knocked on the door and with their ring doorbell they would have seen him before they opened itView attachment 627762won’t someone think of the children
I thought exactly the same!they seemed to be more concerned that he thought they weren’t famous rather than the safety of their kids
Fair enough, I haven’t watched the vlog so didn’t know it had already been mentioned to them several times in the comments. I still don’t necessarily agree with how the man handled it but I’ll agree to disagree on that front.The problem is 300 people posted on their vlog and were either ignored and deleted so a leaflet would have been straight in the bin. The only way to get through to them is the way the man did. They wouldn’t have even mentioned it had he not filmed it.
It’s the fact he’s filmed it that’s annoyed them as shows Chris true colours, lying about kids ages, swearing, following the man, throwing his social media followers around as a threat
if you listen to the beginning of the last clip as well Chris is heard shouting “I swear to god”Who does Chris think he is when he said 'If I take this to social media?' ...
What... like the young girls that took your skinny dipping creeping texts to social media, creepy?
Is kayaking footage still uploaded somewhere? I think we should try to share far and wide so people really see their true colours, especially when creepy is threatening the guy with the social media and how 'famous he is'.
Hopefully they lose followers when people see their true colours and self inflated opinions of themselves
Narcissistic pervert.
Well yeah he went into their “personal space” because that’s where they’re living right now. If you see parents letting their kids run into main roads to play you’re going to knock on their doors aren’t you? Because that’s where they live and that’s where you need to go to speak to them?At risk of being called a fan here (if you look at my other comments you’ll see I’m not) ….. I actually don’t agree with how this man has gone about this. If you approach someone, in their personal space and start telling them they’re putting their children at risk, you’re going to get their backs up and it will only end one way, regardless of what sort of person they are.
Had this man posted an information leaflet through their door on the dangers of lochs and requirements for life vests etc or given it to the site manager to do so, this could have played out entirely differently. I’m not saying the inghams are in the right, but I also don’t think this man is either. He seemed quite antagonistic to me.
*ducks and hides*
They are kinda famous but for all the wrong reasons …I thought exactly the same!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?