I watched her videos (she did 2 parts), they were very good
I watched her videos (she did 2 parts), they were very goodI read through some comments on that “Dark side of family vlogging from Tiffanyferg on YT and there was some really good ones. I didn’t read all of the comments so not it sure if there was any about the Inghams.
I especially like the ones that talk about the children never seem to have a choice about if they want to vlog or not. The camera is literally shoved in their faces. How can young children give consent about what is shared online.
Also getting pregnant for views ( yes Sarah this includes you)
Someone also mentioned about the excessive amount of holiday, shopping, gifts, sponsors etc etc
Also how some vloggers CLICKBAIT family emergencies/ tragedy.
Then there was the mention of privacy and security issues.
Also that your entire life is online for anyone to access. Yes if adults choose to vlog then so be it, but their children’s lives should never be that accessible.
I did read a few comments about the SacconeJolys and something very disturbing.
Not sure how long ago this was but Someone messaged the dad Jonathan informing him of there being pictures of his daughter Emilia on inappropriate websites. Apparently he completely dismissed them.
Also about Anna’s excessive amount of breastfeeding which they though was weird
(I have only ever watched them once and never again)
Not sure of all the details but it reminds me a lot of how Sarah and Chris would react.
I mean they are well know for sweeping things under the rug and pretending “certain things”
Never happened.
Things need to change when it comes to family vlogging. Many of them are living a lie and exploiting their kids everyday without knowing the long term effects
I think I only watched one part but it made for interesting viewingI watched her videos (she did 2 parts), they were very good
This is what’s worrying me...she’s getting so bad/annoying that HE seems like the good guy! That shows you how awful she is!Catching up on the last couple of Blogs and actually nearly switched off. That Santa Claus would have been unplugged within 5 minutes if that was my kitchen. I've seen the lad baby comments above and agree, except Sarah thinks she's ladbaby, pulling the 'pranks' on Chris. I don't know how but she actually somehow makes Chris seem likeable (and I can't stand him)
Apparently Chris has another love child.... Only what I read on here, I've no proofwhy is it Jane's second grandson, Gave doesnt have any children?
I see Chris has shared a photo now too, less edited... back fat and all! (Which is how it should be by the way, we’re none of us perfect!) but her eyes look like they’ve had a dodgey edit!
That's so weird, why would you put the unedited version on your profile. I don't think she looks that bad for a heavily pregnant lady so no need to edit them anyway. Still cannot stand her for the record.I see Chris has shared a photo now too, less edited... back fat and all! (Which is how it should be by the way, we’re none of us perfect!) but her eyes look like they’ve had a dodgey edit!
It's still badly edited! Those legs have had some width badly rubbed out. I honestly don't see the point in editing that much if you're so bad at it. The irony is they heavily edit and hide their own bodies on camera, but think nothing of showing the girls, even though Isabelle seems to cover herself a lot. They're just big a-holes!That's so weird, why would you put the unedited version on your profile. I don't think she looks that bad for a heavily pregnant lady so no need to edit them anyway. Still cannot stand her for the record.
Arrghhhh so annoyed! I see they were in mothercare again, this time at Leeds and it’s been brought to my attention that our management at the top are chuffed to bits to be featured in their vlog!! So frustrating!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?