Per Clara, MW was given pocket money to leave because
No no, the liability lies in FRK constantly posting pictures that messed up SJ's timeline. And her unprofessional approach, despite SJ's attempts to coach her, was tearing into the tit show's public conception (SJ's words).
Marie's other money-making YouTube channel, Success Stories is so pathetic. Will she just be interviewing everyone in SJ's network?! Should we expect that one of these days, she'll be interviewing Dan and Analise's sons and Anna and Philip's girls! Can't she find anyone to interview who is...
tattle.life
Also, per Clara, Dan's vlog is beginning to annoy SJ, perhaps for the opposite reason -- it's too professional.
"....she is really annoyed with him shooting vlog material during working hours."
Is BJJ and his immune compromised friend cooking and eating for themselves in the gite? I don't get travelling cross countries during a pandemic to then stay in a cold chateau with questionable cleanliness with peacock and chicken poo all outside. Weird. BJJ could have taken her somewhere else...
tattle.life
And views all material shot at the chateau as belonging to herself.
Is BJJ and his immune compromised friend cooking and eating for themselves in the gite? I don't get travelling cross countries during a pandemic to then stay in a cold chateau with questionable cleanliness with peacock and chicken poo all outside. Weird. BJJ could have taken her somewhere else...
tattle.life
Unless she's got signed legal releases from everybody she films there, she hasn't got a legal leg to stand on with reference to their images.
I'd be interested to know what legal right Dan has to film himself at work under his NDA. I have to believe you own the rights to film your own life.
In any case, her asking aggressively for his drone shots is a warning to Dan, I'd say. And I wouldn't fork them over without payment, even token compensation, to establish the point he has the right to video his own life and she does NOT own all his videos. I think that's the idea she's angling for here. But Dan's creative input arguably makes the images his, according to one aspect of French copyright law.
Recent postings surrounding the "Red Bus" decision ( http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWPCC/2012/1.html ) have inspired me to make some brief ...
the1709blog.blogspot.com
Says here Dan owns the copyright of his photographs:
Aside from the 2018 spring-summer Fashion Week taking place these days in Paris, the #NoFreePhotos movement was born from a group of street style photographers in order to report the unconsented use of their photographs by brands, influencers, bloggers, who largely release those, in particular...
chloe-fernstrom.fr
Whether or not Lalande or Stephanie have personality rights under French and EU law is something I'd talk to a lawyer about.
I'd also talk to a lawyer about the personality rights of everyone Jarvis films in her vlogs. They have them and should exercise them, from Marie Poupin to the chapel restorer, to MW, the Ians, Kirsty, Antoine, and the ever more powerful Dan.
As to rights of images of the chateau itself, I would suspect she needs a copyright on that. Do her Lalande incorporation documents establish that, that she owns all images of Lalande?
Clara has also noted the long term absence of SJ's two co-owners this summer. Is it that there are no more decadent parties with all their lowlife friends? Or that entertaining the decidedly unhip Patreons is now the priority at Lalande and no one louche is invited? Lest they be witnesses of SJ doing the crotch flash tango with Selmar?