If the terrible editing and piss poor quality of the Channel4 production is any indication, they don't appear to be very selective in their content. So they probs wouldn't give a flying f**k about her morals. IMHO
If the terrible editing and piss poor quality of the Channel4 production is any indication, they don't appear to be very selective in their content. So they probs wouldn't give a flying f**k about her morals. IMHOI have been thinking and happy to be shut down. Fanny gets a great deal of needed oxygen for her grift from channel 4. I truly believe stage one should be contacting the CEO of channel 4 en masse stating in times of financial hardship for most people it seems morally reprehensible that Channel 4 is promoting a woman who is taking patron money to fund her lifestyle when clearly she is already a woman of means-i.e listing her properties and revenue stream and also highlighting the fact little of Fanny's grifted 000000"s have been spent on what she promised. It is therefore unwise for Channel4 a reputable channel to be promoting someone whose accounts and transactions are somewhat shady. This would make them take note I am certain of it. They don't want their image tarnished by some bit playing being a con.
I have worked in media for years and trust me they would, it would get looked into and maybe lead to her being droppedthey don't like scandal or a sense of something that might blow up in their faces that is why the Pethercks were dropped. It is only an afternoon slot reality show which is why it is low budget. What would you do to stop the grift?If the terrible editing and piss poor quality of the Channel4 production is any indication, they don't appear to be very selective in their content. So they probs wouldn't give a flying f**k about her morals. IMHO
I would imagine that sovereign notes etc have already been prepped for this inevitability. A gradual and comfortable transition will prevail. Patreon Days is the only SlapDash, Spank Me In the Pudenda, Blindsided by Fate Event that can’t be excused.Reread what I said maybe misunderstood as not clear enought, yes Charles should be King but delay the cost of upgrading everything associated with it, banknotes, passport changes bring it in more gradually. Thats the cost I am talking about. Locally we adopted the alternative spelling of our town (more in line with Te Reo) the cost to a chartible organisationof 127 members was 4k, in website updates, incorporated society Stationary etc etc. How much is it going to cost a country and the Commonwealth of which I belong has many Countries.
I was wondering if it was Magret de Canard , if so a bit risky as a quite often people can be funny about eating duck.I like prosciutto, but not like they served it. It’s is very hard, very salty, you need melon or something like that to cut it. I usually use it as a rolled meat for charcuterie, but with cheeses, fruits, breads. It looked like some kind of sad main course. They could have done something much more palatable.
It sort of seems everyone has done a bit of everything. Reported her to the tax authorities. Reported her to the Marie. Reported her for B&B violations. Reported her to Channel 4. Reported her to Patreon. Left true negative reviews on trip advisor. Reported her to Christie’s. Reported her to YouTube. Called charities to see if she really donated, she hadn’t. Called on the chapel restorer. Called the water police - stopped her pond swimming pool. I’m not sure what it’s going take at this point. I’m still hopeful about Isabelle’s group. If they went, then they are probably regrouping and traveling right now. But I sure hope she will pop in and give us some deets. We might have been had, but even so, just the threat of it on here spurred Fanny into motion. She created a few new lies about the chapel and at least didn’t let anyone go in there. The tax officials may still be investigating, because I’m pretty sure she’s violating the rules of the non-profit. CoVid and flirting will only get her so far on that one. We could coordinate an en masse negative comment wave to one of her videos with salient points and no insults, but half of us are probably blocked or would end up that way. It needs to be a news story.I have worked in media for years and trust me they would, it would get looked into and maybe lead to her being droppedthey don't like scandal or a sense of something that might blow up in their faces that is why the Pethercks were dropped. It is only an afternoon slot reality show which is why it is low budget. What would you do to stop the grift?
Slaves are more entrancingI still can't understand why on earth they didn't use a catering company. They would have done everything, giving her had the rest of the cast more free time to spend with those who fund her lifestyle. That offering was an absolute insult to all of those who attended.
It seems like all the royals pages have been updated.OMG old Meghan Markle has had her Wikipedia page updated already to: Daughter in law of King Charles the 3.
These narcs are something else aren't they.
Beware, when I was still young and naive and I started discussions like this I got blocked by tattle. You don't want to come back as winterbaby, right?I was defo not attacking/disagreeing with anybody. Just seeking clarification on what that particular poster originally stated as being facts, as far as they were concerned. There is obviously a difference!
And, yes, I am fully aware of how the "ignore" button works too. Thank you for reminding me!
But, from your comments, are you actually attempting to moderate me, which as far as I know, is also against Tattle forum rules too?
Hi Just Grift Wood. While this would be a good move, it would have to be done anonymously. If Fanny can tie a loss of income and any pain and suffering to a specific source, she can sue for libel or defamation. Just a thought to consider.I have been thinking and happy to be shut down. Fanny gets a great deal of needed oxygen for her grift from channel 4. I truly believe stage one should be contacting the CEO of channel 4 en masse stating in times of financial hardship for most people it seems morally reprehensible that Channel 4 is promoting a woman who is taking patron money to fund her lifestyle when clearly she is already a woman of means-i.e listing her properties and revenue stream and also highlighting the fact little of Fanny's grifted 000000"s have been spent on what she promised. It is therefore unwise for Channel4 a reputable channel to be promoting someone whose accounts and transactions are somewhat shady. This would make them take note I am certain of it. They don't want their image tarnished by some bit playing being a con.
Thanks I will be carefulHi Just Grift Wood. While this would be a good move, it would have to be done anonymously. If Fanny can tie a loss of income and any pain and suffering to a specific source, she can sue for libel or defamation. Just a thought to consider.
I found my illustration from Jules 110 too late to reply before the thread closed. Not sure how to message her - hope she sees my post here. THANK YOU!!! This is hysterical. I can't wait to see these tiles in the farm kitchen! LOL.
HiI have worked in media for years and trust me they would, it would get looked into and maybe lead to her being droppedthey don't like scandal or a sense of something that might blow up in their faces that is why the Pethercks were dropped. It is only an afternoon slot reality show which is why it is low budget. What would you do to stop the grift?
I agree. I was counting on more explosive actions from the inner circle during patron days, but by now I feel most of them have gone weary or feel so complicit in the lies and the threat of going down with her. It has to be a news story indeed. Will put serious work in that going forward.It needs to be a news story.
Only fans account ???Danny boy looks like a 70s porn star
I still think someone should pitch her story to Eugene Levy and Christopher Guest for a mockumentary or satire comedy. Truth is stranger than fiction after all.It sort of seems everyone has done a bit of everything. Reported her to the tax authorities. Reported her to the Marie. Reported her for B&B violations. Reported her to Channel 4. Reported her to Patreon. Left true negative reviews on trip advisor. Reported her to Christie’s. Reported her to YouTube. Called charities to see if she really donated, she hadn’t. Called on the chapel restorer. Called the water police - stopped her pond swimming pool. I’m not sure what it’s going take at this point. I’m still hopeful about Isabelle’s group. If they went, then they are probably regrouping and traveling right now. But I sure hope she will pop in and give us some deets. We might have been had, but even so, just the threat of it on here spurred Fanny into motion. She created a few new lies about the chapel and at least didn’t let anyone go in there. The tax officials may still be investigating, because I’m pretty sure she’s violating the rules of the non-profit. CoVid and flirting will only get her so far on that one. We could coordinate an en masse negative comment wave to one of her videos with salient points and no insults, but half of us are probably blocked or would end up that way. It needs to be a news story.
Well..what a crockadoodledoo! Why couldn’t you at least implore them to IRON the tablecloths? Paint the filthy cabinet door? I would adore hearing Natalia going off on Tatyana in that filthy area de cuisine- but - in lieu of that- (gasp?!?!) not sure you have an inside access to anything of consequence . (Gasp!! Again!! ) Colonel Mustard with a candlestick in the library, are we? Professor Plum with a knife in the scullery, are we?I agree. I was counting on more explosive actions from the inner circle during patron days, but by now I feel most of them have gone weary or feel so complicit in the lies and the threat of going down with her. It has to be a news story indeed. Will put serious work in that going forward.
I advise to heed the ‘all eggs in one basket’ thingey- the hope was gorgeous- too gorgeous to actually existDefinitely going to wait and see what @Isabelle6541 comes up with but might also start compiling some tabloid fodder press release from Wiki to distribute it can't do any harm and if someone picks it up it may do good. Think of the newspapers who ran Youtube saved my Chateau and doing an expose on the truth behind it. Channel4 is also newsworthy because the government want to sell it off making such stories in the UK more appealing. Not the right time now with the Queen passing but I am going to start writing something up for release at some point if other stuff doesn't start moving.
Excuse me? I don't know why you would think any of this has been about me, but if you did you were very much wrong. It isn't and never was. Why on earth would I implore anything on them?Well..what a crockadoodledoo! Why couldn’t you at least implore them to IRON the tablecloths? Paint the filthy cabinet door? I would adore hearing Natalia going off on Tatyana in that filthy area de cuisine- but - in lieu of that- (gasp?!?!) not sure you have an inside access to anything of consequence . (Gasp!! Again!! ) Colonel Mustard with a candlestick in the library, are we? Professor Plum with a knife in the scullery, are we?
Sounds Great!I agree. I was counting on more explosive actions from the inner circle during patron days, but by now I feel most of them have gone weary or feel so complicit in the lies and the threat of going down with her. It has to be a news story indeed. Will put serious work in that going forward.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?