How could it, when there are weirdos like this
How could it, when there are weirdos like thisI can't understand how it hasn't yet occurred to Anna that people just don't want to watch creepy Mark and his socks and sandals and potatoes and 'birdwatching'.
He walks in an complains that the tripod is set up for Nanna’s height and people only see his beard. They decorate gingerbread houses and he says he’s the kind of guy who copies the decorations from the box. There’s more of him. See how much creepiness you can stomach.So how much does Mark feature in today's vlog on a scale of 1-10? If it's more than a 6 I don't think I can bring myself to watch.
I can't understand how it hasn't yet occurred to Anna that people just don't want to watch creepy Mark and his socks and sandals and potatoes and 'birdwatching'.
I guess posts about items that turned out to be an “investment” afterwards are more useful.I understand your point, and, indeed, that is the literal textbook definition of the word. However, economists (disclaimer: I’m an economist by training) would say an investment does not necessarily have to have monetary returns; it can also lead non-monetary returns such as utility or enjoyment. In reality, any time we buy something, we are making an investment, i.e., hoping to get a return be it because we can make money out of it or get utility/enjoyment from it; otherwise, we wouldn’t part with our money. If we buy something expensive that we end up using for a lot more years than a cheap item, we could say it was a better investment, i.e. we got more utility or use from it, even if we never resell it. If we do resell it and are lucky enough to make money off it, the returns would be not only the money we made but also the enjoyment we got from it. Just because clothing will almost always depreciate in value doesn’t mean we shouldn’t approach purchases with an “investment” mindset. That said, I wholeheartedly agree that influencers, Anna included, use the term too freely. They don’t have true capsule wardrobes, so no, they are not getting as much utility from each item of clothing and therefore not really making wise investments (then again, they don’t actually buy the items and earn a shitload of money from affiliate links, so I guess they are getting infinite returns).
The thing is though, is it an ‘investment’ if you don’t actually buy it? Anna seems to call lots of things an ‘investment’ when they’ve actually been gifted to her - so she’s not ‘investing’ in anything, apart from herself in a roundabout way. I get that she’s suggesting to her followers that if they buy it, it’s an investment for them, but is she qualified to give that sort of advice?I guess posts about items that turned out to be an “investment” afterwards are more useful.
Because for many people the term investment has now just become an excuse to buy something.
I mean in a weird way, yes, she has so much, so if something stands out in her wardrobe, it must be worth while, because she has a lot of options (sponsorships and brand relations aside). Unlike other people who maybe get a lot of wear out of a coat, because they only buy a new coat every few years.The thing is though, is it an ‘investment’ if you don’t actually buy it? Anna seems to call lots of things an ‘investment’ when they’ve actually been gifted to her - so she’s not ‘investing’ in anything, apart from herself in a roundabout way. I get that she’s suggesting to her followers that if they buy it, it’s an investment for them, but is she qualified to give that sort of advice?
That sounds like way too much Mark for me!He walks in an complains that the tripod is set up for Nanna’s height and people only see his beard. They decorate gingerbread houses and he says he’s the kind of guy who copies the decorations from the box. There’s more of him. See how much creepiness you can stomach.
Ooo good point. It reminds me of an article I read by an influencer/writer I really like:What bloggers failed to mention is the boot theory. It is an investment if you can afford it to begin with, many of them shun fast fashion but how many people can afford investment pieces.
Understanding the 'Boots Theory' of Socioeconomic Unfairness
This is why poor people can't afford to save money.moneywise.com
What do you mean, emphasise?Her jaw and teeth are her worst feature yet she continues to emphasise them in photos
Not OP but for me it's the way she smiles. She seems to be hellbent on having her mouth agape in every picture like, babe, that's not how people normally smile in photos? She looks deranged. Close your teeth, then smile. It's not that hard.What do you mean, emphasise?
Is not her fault that she was born like that, back in GG days people were trolling her jaw and her lower row of teeth. Is not her best features but she seems to only do headless which showcase everything from jaw downwardsWhat do you mean, emphasise?
That was what stood out to me too. But it felt more like that 3-5 day unwashed hair that’s a bit crunchy and does what it wants.Not OP but for me it's the way she smiles. She seems to be hellbent on having her mouth agape in every picture like, babe, that's not how people normally smile in photos? She looks deranged. Close your teeth, then smile. It's not that hard.
What also bothers me in that photo is her hair sticking out, just put it behind your ear ffs!!!
Mark has improved his skills?She looks a lot thinner in pictures than in the video
Maybe finally bought the right fucking lens so not everything he shoots looks three times wider than it isMark has improved his skills?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?