Apologies if this has already been posted. It just came up on my Instagram!
Attachments
-
48.9 KB
Just started reading. How much a property was bought for is public info. Don't these writers do research?Apologies if this has already been posted. It just came up on my Instagram!
Shouldn't that read "Thousands of Z-list women with fragile egos and narcissistic characters are discussed on a public forum which they actively seek out".Apologies if this has already been posted. It just came up on my Instagram!
They literally have to google here to find it. Also dont these mags not realize they are sending more traffic here by posting this stuff.Shouldn't that read "Thousands of Z-list women with fragile egos and narcissistic characters are discussed on a public forum which they actively seek out".
My thoughts entirelyShouldn't that read "Thousands of Z-list women with fragile egos and narcissistic characters are discussed on a public forum which they actively seek out".
wow. I heard about the appalling way the little girl was treated but no more than that!I don't know if anyone saw it but when England beat Germany the other month there was a clip/photo of a little German girl upset in the crowd. I saw it shared because (presumably)England fans wrote some awful things about her in response. Then a guy set up a gofundme or similar for the litter girl. After that the guy's name was trending with #ponce etc. They searched his tweets and innocuous ones about spending time with his children were used as evidence he had a sexual interest in children. They also doctored a profile from a fetishism site to show his details and the age of children he was supposedly interested in. Horrendous. A completely ordinary bloke who set up a fundraiser.
I'm not sure where I'm going with this really but there were no calls to "ban twitter" I suppose is my point. People do maliciously contact children's services (it's happened to me after an argument at work, my then team leader did it anonymously to me). I've known someone be reported to HMRC after an argument at a local constituency Labour Party meeting. This happened pre internet, pre Tattle and post it. If it is co-ordinated here obviously that's a different matter but this site can not be accountable or police what people do off it.
Apologies for the rambling post but just like newspapers which are threatened by social media used to have FB/Twitter scare stories all the time women's mags also have a declining readership. It seems weird to write an article like that assuming Glamour readers would not be posting here and so need an introduction to it in patronising terms. As for the odd bit about the ownership of the site - where, notice, tattle commentators suddenly become quotable sources - do some bleeping research instead of meaningless innuendo.
Edited for clarity (ish)
Which people are perfectly entitled to do - even middle aged mothers"they reported me to the advertising standards authority!"
..for breaking the rules on not declaring adverts
It's all good publicity for tattle. Lots must come here and see how crooked the articles are.Google search volume data for both “tattle” (blue) and “tattle life” (red) - note the peak a few weeks back when Em Sheldon started this ridiculous campaign. Also pls note the y axis isn’t showing search volume it’s a relative index, so 100 = peak search volume, 50 = half that peak, etc. But shows the site is clearly of interest to many, maybe people don’t like undeclared ads after all
View attachment 716629
Can’t tell if these are the average DAUs per week or WAUs but either way, I would imagine multiples of what the old magazine lot are getting nowadays. Which is likely why they are running utter tat on tattle making it sound like we’re doing Blair witch projects in our gardensIt's all good publicity for tattle. Lots must come here and see how crooked the articles are.
Almost every month we get more daily logged in users. And no chance of it going anywhere no matter how much they smear and lie.
View attachment 716865
It is also so important to note that all their details are available PUBLICALLY and LEGALLY under companies houses with their financial information.Just started reading. How much a property was bought for is public info. Don't these writers do research?
Waah wahhh."they reported me to the advertising standards authority!"
..for breaking the rules on not declaring adverts
I must stop posting on this thread, I'm just repeating the same old tit. As are all these embellished and misleading articles the press pump out
banned!!??? I’ve noticed anyone who gives an opinion on the body pos stuff…eg… the need to show a sanitary pad on your pants or show pubic hair, obesity has their comments deleted if it doesn’t fit the memo.Censorship is everywhere now. I got banned from Reddit for offering an opinion the other week on the body positive movement. Obviously ruffled a few feathers so I got the boot.