I don't think it's just laziness from the press. It's not really their aim to write something balanced, unbiased and objective. All they're looking for is clicks and generating a strong response.
They've had tens of thousands of clicks with each article in the past as across dozens of threads on tattle people link it due to the strong negative response. And the influencers give it traffic with their strong positive response.
One balanced article would end the cycle of churning out these quickly done articles where they've decided right from the start the story is vile trolls and poor influencers.
It's a shame even the BBC funds articles and documentaries and they also fail despite their goal to be unbiased and objective. But that's the world we live in.
This doesn't mention tattle, but it's the mail writing a whole "article" about a mum-fluencer shutting down the shamers when no mum shamers were even involved. Looks like a rant she started with a "before anyone criticizes me..".
A churn of easy articles made from nothing to get clicks.
They've had tens of thousands of clicks with each article in the past as across dozens of threads on tattle people link it due to the strong negative response. And the influencers give it traffic with their strong positive response.
One balanced article would end the cycle of churning out these quickly done articles where they've decided right from the start the story is vile trolls and poor influencers.
It's a shame even the BBC funds articles and documentaries and they also fail despite their goal to be unbiased and objective. But that's the world we live in.
This doesn't mention tattle, but it's the mail writing a whole "article" about a mum-fluencer shutting down the shamers when no mum shamers were even involved. Looks like a rant she started with a "before anyone criticizes me..".
A churn of easy articles made from nothing to get clicks.
your paper is all wrong, we talk about things other than public figures and also have rave threads!
