Tanya Burr #6 Where's Martha Moo? Let your followers know it's the least you could do!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I did think that perhaps Tanya did a ‘trial’ giving-away of Martha and doesn’t want to say in case she takes her back or something... like Suzie aka HelloOctober gave her dogs to her parents then eventually got a bf, felt good about her life and took one dog back after a while. That was the only explanation I could think of as to why they wouldn‘t just say outright.

Obviously whatever happened is fucked up, but YTers are very used to coating things in a poor-me and also everything’s fine topcoat. Like the usual ‘I couldn’t give her the attention she deserved and now she’s with a loving family’ spiel. Or if she died, it’s very easy to just say she passed away and get the sympathy comments and move on, no one is going to be demanding a government inquest into Martha’s death to uncover ‘real’ reasons lol. So I guess it’s an ego thing.

And Jim clearly didn’t want the dog either, idk why people can’t grasp that. The story people keep pitching of Tanya secretly and malevolently giving her to a shelter who adopted her out so fast that a deceived Jim, bursting through the shelter doors at the last minute and gasping for dear Martha, only to be told he’s too late, and then carrying on with his ‘still BFFs tho’ charade with Tanya, is frankly bizarre. It’s again an inability to accept the more obvious and blatant reality of the situation— Tanya and Jim got the dog as a married couple and neither of them wanted her in the split.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 31
I did think that perhaps Tanya did a ‘trial’ giving-away of Martha and doesn’t want to say in case she takes her back or something... like Suzie aka HelloOctober gave her dogs to her parents then eventually got a bf, felt good about her life and took one dog back after a while. That was the only explanation I could think of as to why they wouldn‘t just say outright.

Obviously whatever happened is fucked up, but YTers are very used to coating things in a poor-me and also everything’s fine topcoat. Like the usual ‘I couldn’t give her the attention she deserved and now she’s with a loving family’ spiel. Or if she died, it’s very easy to just say she passed away and get the sympathy comments and move on, no one is going to be demanding a government inquest into Martha’s death to uncover ‘real’ reasons lol. So I guess it’s an ego thing.

And Jim clearly didn’t want the dog either, idk why people can’t grasp that. The story people keep pitching of Tanya secretly and malevolently giving her to a shelter who adopted her out so fast that a deceived Jim, bursting through the shelter doors at the last minute and gasping for dear Martha, only to be told he’s too late, and then carrying on with his ‘still BFFs tho’ charade with Tanya, is frankly bizarre. It’s again an inability to accept the more obvious and blatant reality of the situation— Tanya and Jim got the dog as a married couple and neither of them wanted her in the split.
I’m also of the opinion mr dullard isnt innocent in all this
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
Exactly, she’s a lazy slacker, casting directors will see an Instagram parasite on the wrong side of 30, trying to get into acting
How do you know she’s a lazy slacker?! That’s just a stupid statement considering what she’s a whoever at her age. Regardless if she’s now given it up to ‘act’ you can’t deny she did well, that doesn’t just happen.
and I doubt many casting directors would know anything about her except what she herself chooses to Tell them. All she seems to do is distance herself from influencer stuff
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
And Jim clearly didn’t want the dog either, idk why people can’t grasp that. The story people keep pitching of Tanya secretly and malevolently giving her to a shelter who adopted her out so fast that a deceived Jim, bursting through the shelter doors at the last minute and gasping for dear Martha, only to be told he’s too late, and then carrying on with his ‘still BFFs tho’ charade with Tanya, is frankly bizarre. It’s again an inability to accept the more obvious and blatant reality of the situation— Tanya and Jim got the dog as a married couple and neither of them wanted her in the split.
This! I think Sarah's snarky custody comment is pretty crappy tbh - if she's so concerned about Martha's welfare, why didn't they have Martha move in with them in their cosy new place?

It is really sad to think when they split clearly neither of them really wanted her. If my partner and I ever split I know the most contentious thing for us would be that we would both be desperate to keep our pets. Poor Martha, I hope she is actually with a nicer family more deserving of a sweet little dog.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Could it be possible that Martha bit someone and had to be put down or something? Sausage dogs can be aggressive. Maybe she wasn't socialised well with strangers
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
Could it be possible that Martha bit someone and had to be put down or something? Sausage dogs can be aggressive. Maybe she wasn't socialised well with strangers
I was wondering if she developed a spine problem and had to be put down, have had a few friends get sausage dogs with the same issue. Seems really common.
OMG are we back on Martha 😒
I really don’t understand the point of posts like this - if you’re bored of the topic change the subject instead of policing what everyone else is talking about without actually adding anything?
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 28
Yeah other people might just have different interests than you... just ignore it and discuss what you want to discuss
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 12
Sorry didn’t mean to police .. I just think it’s really run it’s course. It’s clearly never going to be revealed. Clearly Tanya or Jim didn’t do anything horrendous that would have led to the dogs demise or the RSPCA would have prosecuted. Clearly got rid of the dog because both of them less busy lives, now without each other. Tanya clearly saw herself travelling a lot to “LA” for acting and she does spend a lot of time over there in the last couple of years. Re-homing Martha was probably the most responsible thing to do.
like Simon Cowell always said - he loves dogs but never kept them because he can’t be there for them with his lifestyle like they deserve. Lots of people re-home their dogs when they can’t look after them properly anymore.
Lockdown is inconsequential because they clearly did so before March and can’t imagine they’ll hang around much when they can travel more freely again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
Sorry didn’t mean to police .. I just think it’s really run it’s course. It’s clearly never going to be revealed. Clearly Tanya or Jim didn’t do anything horrendous that would have led to the dogs demise or the RSPCA would have prosecuted. Clearly got rid of the dog because both of them less busy lives, now without each other. Tanya clearly saw herself travelling a lot to “LA” for acting and she does spend a lot of time over there in the last couple of years. Re-homing Martha was probably the most responsible thing to do.
like Simon Cowell always said - he loves dogs but never kept them because he can’t be there for them with his lifestyle like they deserve. Lots of people re-home their dogs when they can’t look after them properly anymore.
Lockdown is inconsequential because they clearly did so before March and can’t imagine they’ll hang around much when they can travel more freely again.
this still doesn’t explain why they completely ignore any questions about the missing dog that they plastered all over their social media for years. Why don’t either of them just address it. It’s odd. They had completely valid and normal reasons as to why they’d have the dog rehomed. They’ve split up and they both were travelling a lot for work and for holidays. Wanted to give Martha the best life she deserves blah blah. To block any mention of the dog and ignore all questions from their fans is bizarre.
I wonder what happens when they bump into fans occasionally now if out walking etc. If a fan innocently asked how is Martha? Not with you today? Not seen her in a while online? How awkward would that be! Theee is one thing ignoring questions onlibe but to ignore direct questions face to face?
Also surprised Daily Fail hasn’t got hold of this yet!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Still hoping she’ll do a video on how she lost the weight! She lost it so quickly. I Could really use it right now 😂
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 8
Still hoping she’ll do a video on how she lost the weight! She lost it so quickly. I Could really use it right now 😂
She restricts calories, it's as simple as that. At least she's stopped with the constant food posts now, that really bothered me. Showing plates full of pasta and cake every single day while being thinner than she's ever been.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 25
View attachment 208786

She looks like she’s waiting for a smear test 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
She’s literally just sat down. I know Tanya is no saint and this is a gossip site but I thought she genuinely looked really happy there/in her recent posts where she’s surrounded with family. Bit more of a breath of fresh air than her usual blank stares selfies. I understand she’ll get stick for whatever she does, just fancied throwing my two cents in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 26
I think it's the fact that she's not even in a bikini, she clearly just took off her trousers or whatever in the middle of the park and is sat there in her knickers
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Sick
Reactions: 23
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.