She is going to make one beautiful bride eventually
![Pleading face :pleading_face: 🥺](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f97a.png)
I thought the same - protects the boys but shows Daph in her knickers. Whats that about?She’s either desperate for engagement or actively encouraging unsavoury people to use the footage for other means.
Won’t post the boys faces, but girl toddler in her pants is fine.
Do better Susan
Was yesterday I think - probably expired nowHas she deleted it?
Can you imagine her surviving a proper days work?!Oh my word, long long time lurker, never post. That story of I have no kids today do I? Read a book, go on a day date, go in the garden etc. I shouted at my phone, go to workthat’s when I have no kids
Does anyone else follow @dontcrossagayman on insta? He's just done a post about this exact kind of fuckwitted exploitation of children but mum-fluencers.putting up videos of her 3 year old child dancing in her underwear on her public account is next level. Is she that bleeping stupid or does her need for CoNtEnT override her child’s safety and privacy. I really hope it’s the former.
This once happened at my sons swimming lesson. A dad (innocently) filmed his daughter swimming (it was the first time she had done it without armbands) to show her mum. The swimming teacher told him to stop then went over and was going to watch him delete the video (she was super polite and did say he could refill in an empty pool at the end) there was only one other child in the video and as it was a special moment that parent allowed him to keep it.Ex-swim teacher here. I don't care if she "only took a pic of her child"
No phones poolside is the very first rule of safeguarding. Her swim teacher should have called her out for that pic of Daphne IMMEDIATELY, and Susie should never have put the instructor in a position to have that conversation.