Susie Verrill #2 woke in the streets, racist in the tweets.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I think Alison Perry in particular had a weak response - ‘that’s an unfollow from me’ - IF she returns to Instagram 🙄 this woman knows Susie, is friends with her on Facebook, clearly has her email/number as they’ve worked together - if you’re so keen to call her out, bloody well do it! Don’t just post veiled references to her in stories that disappear in 24 hours.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Heart
Reactions: 14
How much do Gleam really care about Susie? She's not Hinch. She's just another mummy influencer. There's tons of them. If she ignored gleams advice, and she's losing contracts, why not just cut her loose?

That’s how you call someone out 👀
Ouch!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
I've just emailed it to Daily mail. Not my favourite newspaper but most likely to print it. I really feel strongly about this and I really can't let it go! Keep you all posted if I get a response.



Benefit replied to me and said they dropped her end of last year. I posted their message in a earlier thread.
Someone should contact the paper in Dover, seeing as she’s slagged the town off!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
I don’t understand why so many are not naming her - the vague hints at “someone I worked with” by SO many of them if they do mention it at all is so disingenuous. That said, I’m glad she’s said something. The collective silence has been deafening on this one.
AGREED! if you’re not saying her name you are not calling her out - you are merely referencing it to the people who already know!!!! Pointless!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
As well as being no black people in Dover (according to SJV) are there also no disabled people or overweight people? Is Dover just full of able bodied, thin, cis-het white people. Guess so, I’ve never been. Clearly there are people from Romania living there, but they’re fair game apparently.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 6
The fact that she took the same approach she did with her old tweets in private with the mother of a disabled child (you’d think that would make someone humbler/more circumspect even if only out of social embarrassment, at the very least!) when it would have cost her absolutely nothing to do the right thing makes me a lot more dubious about her. Most people have an aversion to hurting someone’s feelings, and by the sounds of it this was not something where the hurt feelings were over something fundamentally benign. So it is troubling that SV’s instinct was to do nothing.
I really respect the posts you have made in this discussion, you have raised some interesting points. I really think that your point about Susie‘s instinct to do nothing is particularly of interest. (This is referring to the situation discussed about, not the tweets)

I don’t think Susie is alone in this instinct. There are multiple posts across the website where people have contacted influencers about posts they have made and the general response is block/delete. There appears to be an arrogance level based on followers that means these influencers are untouchable or unquestionable.

Pictures of children naked in the bath are posted regularly if questioned...block/delete.
One influencers children were apparently found on a porn site in their swimming costumes, someone contacted them...guess what? Block/delete and then she posted pictures that day in their swim suits.

There is an influencer accepting paypal payments that she claims she is using to fund work with DV victims, people have asked for a newsletter or information about where that money they have given goes...guess what...block/delete.

I agree with your comments earlier on about cancel culture, people do make mistakes and conversations about changing behaviour should happen, I understand your link to the olden days about people being put in the stocks and mocked however there are very few influencers who will ever accept they make mistakes.

They seem to be living on a level of self importance, where they can do no wrong and will be fluffed up their followers if any one dares question their behaviour. That can’t be good for society as a whole. A lot of people come to tattle who were originally fans of the people they now discuss, because when they questioned any behaviour they got deleted and then realised through this site they weren’t alone.

As soon as anyone on Social Media is questioned they simplify it down to ‘troll’.

There needs to be an understanding that asking questions about stories, posts, advice shared, adverts etc, questions that might be uncomfortable aren’t trolling. This discussion just isn’t happening in Instagram, actually it might be there probably are a small number of influencers who will have it but I just haven’t seem it.

I think the simplicity of the situation at the moment is you are either a fan or a troll has led to the cancel culture being more prominent. I should be able to follow someone on Instagram and ask them a question without being deleted, in the same way that they should be able to make a mistake without worrying about instant cancellation.

This leads to influencers who are nervous about being caught out. There is almost an unhealthy level of emotion on each side, and it does feel like sides when really there should be discussion happening somewhere in the middle.

I hope this makes sense and is obviously a wider discussion that just SV, I’d be interested in what you think.

*Id also be interested in what any of the 2170 guests think...I reckon there are a few influencers hiding in that number. You can stay anonymous but are welcome to join the debate.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 42
I really respect the posts you have made in this discussion, you have raised some interesting points. I really think that your point about Susie‘s instinct to do nothing is particularly of interest. (This is referring to the situation discussed about, not the tweets)

I don’t think Susie is alone in this instinct. There are multiple posts across the website where people have contacted influencers about posts they have made and the general response is block/delete. There appears to be an arrogance level based on followers that means these influencers are untouchable or unquestionable.

Pictures of children naked in the bath are posted regularly if questioned...block/delete.
One influencers children were apparently found on a porn site in their swimming costumes, someone contacted them...guess what? Block/delete and then she posted pictures that day in their swim suits.

There is an influencer accepting paypal payments that she claims she is using to fund work with DV victims, people have asked for a newsletter or information about where that money they have given goes...guess what...block/delete.

I agree with your comments earlier on about cancel culture, people do make mistakes and conversations about changing behaviour should happen, I understand your link to the olden days about people being put in the stocks and mocked however there are very few influencers who will ever accept they make mistakes.

They seem to be living on a level of self importance, where they can do no wrong and will be fluffed up their followers if any one dares question their behaviour. That can’t be good for society as a whole. A lot of people come to tattle who were originally fans of the people they now discuss, because when they questioned any behaviour they got deleted and then realised through this site they weren’t alone.

As soon as anyone on Social Media is questioned they simplify it down to ‘troll’.

There needs to be an understanding that asking questions about stories, posts, advice shared, adverts etc, questions that might be uncomfortable aren’t trolling. This discussion just isn’t happening in Instagram, actually it might be there probably are a small number of influencers who will have it but I just haven’t seem it.

I think the simplicity of the situation at the moment is you are either a fan or a troll has led to the cancel culture being more prominent. I should be able to follow someone on Instagram and ask them a question without being deleted, in the same way that they should be able to make a mistake without worrying about instant cancellation.

This leads to influencers who are nervous about being caught out. There is almost an unhealthy level of emotion on each side, and it does feel like sides when really there should be discussion happening somewhere in the middle.

I hope this makes sense and is obviously a wider discussion that just SV, I’d be interested in what you think.

*Id also be interested in what any of the 2170 guests think...I reckon there are a few influencers hiding in that number. You can stay anonymous but are welcome to join the debate.
This should be posted on every thread! Brilliant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
IMG_20200606_103336.jpg


Crikey ....... So will speak out about big Tesco's as a group.
But won't speak about Susie because she likes her hair and her veneers.

Right.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Angry
Reactions: 15
Brummy Mummy’s comments on her Insta stories, for anyone interested who hasn’t seen. I used to follow quite a few of these ‘influencers’ but as you can see now, don’t.

I loathe the term ‘influencer’. Always have. Always will. Who is anyone to be paid to influence anyone else? Why do we need to be influenced? Why are they in a position to influence us?

I don’t wish any ill will on anyone but I hope the entire ‘influencer’ bubble is popped very quickly. It seems it is, always was and always will be a shambles. A sham. A facade. Being held up as a ‘poster girl’ for life is probably a fool’s errand.

If I’m influenced by anyone, I’ll decide on that based on my life/experience/morals/ethics. But it certainly won’t be someone being paid to influence me. Certainly not someone selling multivitamins on their grid. Or jam. Or food delivery services.


Cancel culture is an interesting debate. I believe that with genuine remorse and change, there can be forgiveness when someone makes mistakes. I’ve forgiven a lot in my own life, even if I haven’t necessarily forgotten and my relationship with that individual has come to an end because of their actions - no matter how sorry for they were. But when it comes to ‘influencers’, I’d be happy to cancel with immediate effect.
 

Attachments

  • Like
Reactions: 7
This is an interview from Susiebluessy? Who, given the intro to her interview, was following SV on Twitter from at least when she started dating Greg.... so has she not seen these tweets before?

Something doesn’t add up here.
Good spot, did not even look at who wrote it or think about how long they must have been following her before the interview... Dodgy!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I don’t understand why so many are not naming her - the vague hints at “someone I worked with” by SO many of them if they do mention it at all is so disingenuous. That said, I’m glad she’s said something. The collective silence has been deafening on this one.
as I’ve just realised she could be in about Mrs Meldrum
 
I remember recently (I think summer 2019), one of the instahuns was apparently being trolled and Susie took to instastories and announced "if you don't leave her alone I will cut you". She's always been a nasty woman, the racism doesn't come as a shock at all
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 10
I remember recently (I think summer 2019), one of the instahuns was apparently being trolled and Susie took to instastories and announced "if you don't leave her alone I will cut you". She's always been a nasty woman, the racism doesn't come as a shock at all
That was Candice Brathwaite

It’s how I first found Candice via Susie
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Even though we have an abundance of Susie's tweets screen-shotted, I expect the ones we have are just a drop in the ocean. There was only a very short time period (an hour or so...), where we were able to search her twitter before it was deleted. During that short time, practically every offensive search term I typed in on her twitter was throwing up so many results; I only screen-shotted a very small selection. I wonder how many more tweets there are that we missed.

That said, I think we all get the picture from the selection of tweets we have of what else might have been there.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 13
It’s really just exposing what a sham this industry is. These are unexceptional people, without real merit (not writers, nor photographers, musicians, designers, seamstresses etc etc not creators in the traditional sense of having a talent and honing it) who tapped into something new and their own inherent desire to show off. Why wouldn’t the wheels come off eventually is the real question for me.

A rare few have stumbled upon a talent, a good eye and an engaging word, and something unique and positive but crucially with purpose (equality, inclusion, diversity) and they are the ones worth noticing now and then but not being influenced by - influencing for purchasing and showing offs sake needs to stop.

*And another thing 🥳 ...... Tattle has this gross reputation right? But the threads I read are largely made of posts which are well considered, critical, structured - spelling and grammar all on point - which doesn’t really tally with this reputation of Dante’s spitting inferno where we’re all dribbling incoherently with rage and dissatisfaction with our own lives.

I am not sure why this industry thinks it’s above comment or analyses.

*some threads are quite hell firery.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 31
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.