There are more black contestant on this years series compared to other years, isn't that right?
If that is the case, it kind of stands to reason that there's a likelihood that there will be a higher number of black contestants progressing throughout the competition then.
While box ticking or tokenism or whatever you want to call it does happen and doesn't help anybody, the competition this year really isn't an example of it.
This is kinda what I wanted to put, so thank you for eloquently finding the words that I couldn't.
I absolutely have first hand experience of agendas in the workplace from higher management.
But Strictly is not an example of this. Look at how much
tit Fleur received from the judges until recently, and look at Molly last night - undermarked AGAIN for a really good technical dance, yet Will seems to breeze through the competition. Jayde was crap but she still got overmarked.
If there is an agenda, maybe it's a case of Hamza being a lovely kind man, and a positive role model for everyone, including the younger folk. No toxic masculinity, just a beautiful soul in love with nature. I can see why the Beeb would push that. And I am totally down with that.
Same with Rose last year - not my favourite, and not the best dancer (IMO) but look at how much awareness she raised around deafness. What a message that sent when she was the winner.