They can and do use surveillance to monitor peopleDo you favour monitoring of social media for those under suspicion.
I get the sense that people don't realise the amount that governments can do under national security reasoning - the below gives a bit of a run down, there's also a bunch of EU caselaw on this regarding the right to privacy and national security discretion
I think I'm under surveillance - Liberty (libertyhumanrights.org.uk)
I get the impression that spy cops scandal would fall under national security reasoning these days too, though it seems that the words were never used but it's all sort of alluded to
CCJS_SpecBrief1_4Dec18.qxp (crimeandjustice.org.uk)
Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Act 2021 - Wikipedia
which allows undercover law enforcement agents or covert sources to break the law in the interests of national security, the wellbeing of the UK's economy, or in order to detect or prevent crime. CCAs must only be used to prevent more serious crimes being committed and when there is no practicable legal path by which the same outcome could be achieved
Last edited: