Othedrs have been monitored didnt stop concerts with kids in them being blown up - she should stay where she is - or you could let her live with you and yours if you feel she is so safe and just a misunderstood kid
Well whatever intelligence they have on her, the Government doesn't believe she'd live a normal-ish life at all. Which is why she's not coming back.
That isn't why she's not coming back. It's literally only because they can revoke her citizenship and it's a crowd pleaser.
Sajid said they know things they're not releasing to the public which is why she's not coming back.
What if her mission is recruitment officer, they don’t carry out the acts it’s others do that for them , you can only be charged with a crime if they have proof you committed one.
Source: trust me fam
They can easily prove recruitment though? They know Asqa Mahmood recruited Sharmeena, who played a part in recruiting Shamima.
And what's your source, twitter?
My source is a basic understanding of the criminal justice system which requires actual evidence of wrongdoing.
It's her risk they assessed, not any wrongdoing. As has been said before, there wouldn't be much to charge her with here as everything happened in Syria.
What do you think they would have done with her if she didn't have a claim to a second nationality?
Not without evidence, that’s why terror groups continue to grow. How many have faced charges on suspicion to incite? Not many imo ,the next in line just takes over and Intel know it.
www.theguardian.com
Was there a documentary about this one a couple of years ago? I feel like I've seen her interviewed.from 2016:
“Jailing her for four years for her Isis membership and two years for encouraging acts of terror in messages she sent via social media, the judge said she would be entitled to release on licence after the halfway point.”
British woman who joined Isis is jailed for six years
Tareena Shakil travelled to Syria with her young son and was found guilty of encouraging acts of terror on social media
Interestingly the news stories from recently seem favourable to her despite the fact that the judge says she lied repeatedly in court and to police
Does that not count as evidence? Begum maintains she was only a housewife.from 2016:
“Jailing her for four years for her Isis membership and two years for encouraging acts of terror in messages she sent via social media, the judge said she would be entitled to release on licence after the halfway point.”
British woman who joined Isis is jailed for six years
Tareena Shakil travelled to Syria with her young son and was found guilty of encouraging acts of terror on social media
Interestingly the news stories from recently seem favourable to her despite the fact that the judge says she lied repeatedly in court and to police
He made the original comments very soon after the initial decision to deprive Shamima Begum of her citizenship and his reasoning was that the Home Secretary should have taken account of the fact that she had a new born baby. He also talked about the legal options to deal with her if she returned to the UK. Clearly the situation and his understanding of it has changed since then. Whether that's enough to justify his opinion that she shouldn't be allowed to return only he knows.
From 7th Feb - I assume this year because otherwise it would say?
---
I don't think it matters what Begum did or did not do for ISIS if they can potentially arrest her simply for joining ISIS
The funny thing is, I bet a lot of those people would watch her on IACGMOOH and vote for her to do every trial!
I edited above, she was released in summer of 2018!!
The funny thing is, I bet a lot of those people would watch her on IACGMOOH and vote for her to do every trial!
---
I edited above, she was released in summer of 2018!!
(from The Guardian article)
