I think I might be the only person left on earth who still thinks he was somehow mentally trapped in childhood and didn’t do the things he was accused of.
I’ve seen the documentary, and I believe that because of the way he would pick people (Boys) up and drop them when a new favourite came along, that the allegations were borne out of bitterness - they got used to being the centre of his attention and the fame/lifestyle and couldn’t handle it when he ditched them - and that the accusers are so convincing because they’ve been repeating it over and over for so many years.
I’m not even a big MJ fan, and no doubt he was messed up, but I just do not believe that he was an abuser. I don’t think there’s any concrete evidence is there?!
You sound like my ex-friend (we didn't fall out over the MJ subject, fwiw).
Why would a grown man want unsupervised sleepovers with young boys? Why would he throw money at their parents? If he truly loved these children and had no sinister motives he could easily have kept it to day trips to Disney or shopping expeditions or whatever he fancied and kept the boundaries safe and respectful, as an ADULT. He had POWER and INFLUENCE, don't forget, people are blinded by that - children are not streetwise about adults and are trusting and go along with their decisions - not to mention he had buckets of cash at the height of his fame, and his status meant he could get VIP treatment.
It must have felt very exciting and flattering to be MJ's "best friend", stepping into his world, with all the thrills and once-in-a-lifetime experiences it brought. A child wouldn't know how to process all that, never mind the physical and emotional lines being crossed by someone they trusted.
Surely a parent would find it a bit weird that they were getting a fancy car, a new house, bills paid, trips abroad, just because MJ took a liking to their little boy? And then slowly becoming isolated from their child? As I often say to people, a true friend wants nothing but your time - if you have to "buy" their interest, something is wrong.
I made the comparison before - Liberace too would acquire a new favourite pretty young thing* (who he lavished in gifts at first) then grow bored when they (probably) got too demanding, too old or the thrill of the chase wore off (I've read Scott Thorson's biography as well as watched Behind The Candleabra). Usually they'd get paid off and served a gagging order - in Thorson's case he was pretty much forcably thrown out due to his drug addiction. Not all famous gay men are like this, and those men were of age, but that was a similar-ish pattern.
MJ's ex-assistant said that was true enough, that young boys would play off against each other to be the favourite or make up stories to get people fired just for a laugh (and I'm sure adults trying to be a famous person's number one do the same, in more devious ways). But just as that doesn't prove abuse, how can you prove they were NOT abused?
It's very common in a celeb's inner circle for people to battle over being top dog, playing power games. This proves zero.
MJ's public image was just that - an illusion, like other famous people. The gentle, little boy act disappeared when he was off-duty. There are recordings of him using his much-deeper everyday voice, not the squeaky, child-like one. It was an act to appear harmless and non-threatening to get what he wanted and shape the persona he wished others to see. He could be very manipulative and callous when he wanted.
Why you don't find this all very unusual is beyond me.
*Weirdly, MJ wrote a song called "PYT" - Pretty Young Thing! And probably the campest song ever, "Muscles" by Diana Ross.