Plus she never bought it, it was a undeclared freebie.
ever noticed the kid never gets anything or taken anywhere unless it’s paid for content?
ever noticed the kid never gets anything or taken anywhere unless it’s paid for content?
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I just think it’s bleeping bizarre tbh like who encourages their child to bash duck out of their own face
each to their own though
I am sorry, I get your point but totally disagree.
Her daughter is of the age where educating and learning the right from the wrong is everything. Yet she is given a piñata of herself to smash in! That is beyond mentally abusive.
It is no different to having a picture of your face put onto a dartboard and been asked to throw darts at it, or on a boxing bag.....
It was a terrible decision by someone who should not be a parent....and if you are new to this forum I suggest you read alot of the other child neglect stories that she has done.
Well said...it is mentally wrong and as we know she does not give a tit for her daughter.
i think when you add to her countless tit parenting moments it’s justified, the tit she gets for it. Plus she didn’t buy it, it was free as per usual!
It’s the subconscious long term damage something like that could do to a kid who’s already around toxic people like her having to be her mothers puppet for her mothers gain ...all that while she’s plastering it all over the internet for content thinking she’s hilarious and calling it “revenge”?
Im far from a perfect parent, believe me I’m not preaching, but I think Steph blurs the lines between what’s best for Cora and what’s best for Steph far too often!
Same I have two kiddies myself, both around Cora's age, and I am far from perfect and make mistakes.
But I would never mentally torcher my children like she does. I never neglect them and spend all my time on social media. I would not ask them to get up and cook breakfast around electrical appliances for me!
I would not come across as a slag on social media, happily boasting about it, knowing my childrens parents will see it.
Cora will get bullied, if not already, she will grow up with serious mental health issues from a mother who puts sex and alcohol and probably white stuff before her and that is a fact.
Wtf is that monstrosity
Attachments
Tbh, you could argue it's worse than having a dart board as you've described here because of the positive reinforcement that the sweets add to the whole situation and the actual origins and symbolism of piñata's, which I'm going to assume Meffanny hasn't a clue about. I'm sure the only other types of those piñatas I've seen have been unfavourable politicians and the like which I, personally, think says a lot about the nature of them. There's a reason traditional Piñatas aren't so personal and in short it's because the Piñata itself is usually a symbol of evil.
There's so many layers to why that Piñata nonsense was awful and honestly I'm baffled by a company even making one of a child's face. Screams of a quick profit business with no care for the traditions of the product they are flogging but I digress...
At best it's bizarre and poorly though out, at worst it's something Cora is gonna talk about in therapy 20 years from now.
Didn’t she also put a caption on it saying “Time for revenge” or something like that?
What was that all about? Revenge on who?
Brilliantly put, as for Meffany not knowing the origins and evilness of them, I am probably sure she does.
Bloody brilliant post this!
Yer I’m pretty sure Steph shared one with Boris or trump on?
Where has she mentioned the piñata dm?
On her insta stories
Attachments
Why does she constantly when anyone criticises her either in public domain or dm does she have to try and shame them and put it all over her insta stories etc. She really doesn’t handle any type of criticism well which for someone who puts themselves out there so much on socials and tries to come across as this successful, socialist pillar of society she should either reel it in for once or just think before she posts....she’ll do neither though I’m sure.
The way she speaks, "and I can't stress this enough," does my bleeping head in.
Reminds me of a brassy 17yr old.
Because she’s insecure as duck because she knows she’s an irrelevant waste of space who doesn’t actually contribute anything of value to anything.
Even though she’s allegedly ‘made a million’ and all that, I bet given the chance of going back to being anon and working at Barclays she’d bite your hand off.
Are we going to hold a closing party when her tit shop in town goes under???? A DAB party outdoors!
When she goes bankrupt and it is took over she will spin a positive and say she has been bought out!
She will also blame covid, tories, lack of footfall and all that other bollox!
I wonder like any other business person she carried out a survey in town to see if their is a demand for a tit tat shop like hers??
Probably not!
I think I’d just respect her a lot more if she was honest and said, “look, I don’t particularly enjoy motherhood and its trappings. I do my job [it’s not a job but I’ll let her have it in this imaginary statement] and that pays for the house which my ex and child live in and he’s her primary caregiver”.
She’d get tit from certain people because society is inherently sexist, but I know loads of women who’ve really not taken to motherhood, and resent the loss of their career/social life/autonomy. If Cora is getting the emotional stability that she needs from Paul and the financial support from Steph then that’s grand: men have been getting away with being absentee dads who pay child support (or in the case of my dad, pay duck all
) for centuries. I think it’d be a really interesting way to start a conversation about the bleeping mad expectations on women to have a career and a side hustle and also be a full-on earth mother.
In a way it’s sad that she feels the need to keep up a pretence. She’s still a preposterous person in every other respect, of course.
She’d get tit from certain people because society is inherently sexist, but I know loads of women who’ve really not taken to motherhood, and resent the loss of their career/social life/autonomy. If Cora is getting the emotional stability that she needs from Paul and the financial support from Steph then that’s grand: men have been getting away with being absentee dads who pay child support (or in the case of my dad, pay duck all
) for centuries. I think it’d be a really interesting way to start a conversation about the bleeping mad expectations on women to have a career and a side hustle and also be a full-on earth mother.In a way it’s sad that she feels the need to keep up a pretence. She’s still a preposterous person in every other respect, of course.
The piñata:
This may sound dramatic, but hear me out: if both parents were involved in contested contact/custody proceedings or if a social services referral have been made in respect of Cora, then the piñata would be the subject of much courtroom debate (all of which would be negative) to the extent that Paul's lawyer would have a field day with that nugget of information. It's easy to say, "but that's not the case so it's fine", but it isn't. It's questionable behaviour at best, damaging at worst.
I'm aware nothing like this is going on with the child, but if the piñata would be a legal bullet in the head in the right circumstances, then it's not right in day to day life either.
The shop:
The shop will fail. She will either be evicted or she'll have to remortgage her property (doubt that will happen though given paying bills has never been a priority for her). And when it happens, I'll put on my best sequin number and rhumba past her shop window.
Ya girl Shirl has quite the knowledge base.
This may sound dramatic, but hear me out: if both parents were involved in contested contact/custody proceedings or if a social services referral have been made in respect of Cora, then the piñata would be the subject of much courtroom debate (all of which would be negative) to the extent that Paul's lawyer would have a field day with that nugget of information. It's easy to say, "but that's not the case so it's fine", but it isn't. It's questionable behaviour at best, damaging at worst.
I'm aware nothing like this is going on with the child, but if the piñata would be a legal bullet in the head in the right circumstances, then it's not right in day to day life either.
The shop:
The shop will fail. She will either be evicted or she'll have to remortgage her property (doubt that will happen though given paying bills has never been a priority for her). And when it happens, I'll put on my best sequin number and rhumba past her shop window.
Ya girl Shirl has quite the knowledge base.
- Status